Run build-publish workflow in aos dev-base #6

Merged
coilyco-ops merged 1 commit from issue-5 into main 2026-07-09 15:53:56 +00:00
Member

Closes #5

Closes #5
Author
Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-steam-ops-6 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-09T15:51:29Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-gaming/steam-ops#6 · branch issue-6 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-steam-ops-6 · ward v0.493.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T15:51:29Z
  • Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-steam-ops-6` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-09T15:51:29Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-gaming/steam-ops#6` · branch `issue-6` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-steam-ops-6` · ward `v0.493.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T15:51:29Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
coilyco-ops deleted branch issue-5 2026-07-09 15:53:56 +00:00
Author
Member

WARD-OUTCOME: done

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate

Merged PR 6, closed duplicate salvage PR 7, and left the repo on main. The work felt like merge cleanup rather than code changes. Confidence: high. Surprises: Forgejo already had both PR refs and the merge was green. Follow-ups: none.

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅ <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate Merged PR 6, closed duplicate salvage PR 7, and left the repo on `main`. The work felt like merge cleanup rather than code changes. Confidence: high. Surprises: Forgejo already had both PR refs and the merge was green. Follow-ups: none. </details>
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.