Make ward exec repo verbs use the coilyco config bundle in ward containers

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 09:53:27 +00:00

Member

Problem

While working on PR ward#997, the worker reported:

ward exec test still fails in this container. cmd/ward/setup_test.go and cmd/ward/smartdefaults_test.go report that WARD_CONFIG_REF stays at the baked neutral default instead of pointing at the coilyco bundle for coilyco-flight-deck/ward.

That means repo-local ward exec test inside a ward engineer container is not seeing the coilyco WARD_CONFIG_REF bundle. The result is a confusing test failure that looks like a code regression but is actually config-source bootstrap drift.

Related context:

agentic-os#427 tracks missing WARD_CONFIG_REF in read-only director containers.
This issue tracks the ward-side repo verb/config bootstrap symptom reported from a ward engineer container.
ward#997 is currently blocked partly because its test gate is red with this failure.

Acceptance criteria

In a ward engineer container for coilyco-flight-deck/ward, ward exec test sees the intended coilyco config bundle, not the baked neutral default.
The relevant setup/smart-defaults tests pass without an inline WARD_CONFIG_REF=... override.
If the coilyco bundle cannot be resolved, the error names the missing config source instead of silently using neutral defaults.
The fix does not make external/neutral ward users depend on coilyco config.
PR ward#997 or its replacement can run the repo test gate without this config-source false failure.

## Problem While working on PR `ward#997`, the worker reported: ```text ward exec test still fails in this container. cmd/ward/setup_test.go and cmd/ward/smartdefaults_test.go report that WARD_CONFIG_REF stays at the baked neutral default instead of pointing at the coilyco bundle for coilyco-flight-deck/ward. ``` That means repo-local `ward exec test` inside a ward engineer container is not seeing the coilyco `WARD_CONFIG_REF` bundle. The result is a confusing test failure that looks like a code regression but is actually config-source bootstrap drift. Related context: * `agentic-os#427` tracks missing `WARD_CONFIG_REF` in read-only director containers. * This issue tracks the ward-side repo verb/config bootstrap symptom reported from a ward engineer container. * `ward#997` is currently blocked partly because its test gate is red with this failure. ## Acceptance criteria * In a ward engineer container for `coilyco-flight-deck/ward`, `ward exec test` sees the intended coilyco config bundle, not the baked neutral default. * The relevant setup/smart-defaults tests pass without an inline `WARD_CONFIG_REF=...` override. * If the coilyco bundle cannot be resolved, the error names the missing config source instead of silently using neutral defaults. * The fix does not make external/neutral ward users depend on coilyco config. * PR `ward#997` or its replacement can run the repo test gate without this config-source false failure.

coilyco-ops added the

headless

P1

labels

2026-07-10 09:53:27 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 10:00:04 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-1000 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-10T10:00:03Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000 · branch issue-1000 · harness codex · workflow pull-requests-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1000 · ward v0.573.0 · dispatched 2026-07-10T10:00:03Z
Comment thread: 2 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:53:38Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:56:47Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.573.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-1000` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-10T10:00:03Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000` · branch `issue-1000` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-requests-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1000` · ward `v0.573.0` · dispatched `2026-07-10T10:00:03Z` - **Comment thread:** 2 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:53:38Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:56:47Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.573.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-10 10:19:51 +00:00

Make ward exec repo verbs use the coilyco config bundle in ward containers #1012

coilyco-ops referenced this issue

2026-07-10 10:20:50 +00:00

Replace unmergeable ward#1012 config-bundle PR with a landing fix #1014

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 17:38:29 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-1000 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-10T17:38:28Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000 · branch issue-1000 · harness codex · workflow pull-requests-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1000 · ward v0.584.0 · dispatched 2026-07-10T17:38:28Z
Comment thread: 2 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:53:38Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:56:47Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.584.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-1000` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-10T17:38:28Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000` · branch `issue-1000` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-requests-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1000` · ward `v0.584.0` · dispatched `2026-07-10T17:38:28Z` - **Comment thread:** 2 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:53:38Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:56:47Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.584.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-10 17:52:27 +00:00

Make ward exec repo verbs use the coilyco config bundle in ward containers #1066

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 18:05:43 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-requests-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default. The config-source fix is in and the focused `go test ./cmd/ward -run 'TestRunSetupWithUnsetRef|TestBuildForgejoOpsFromRealBundle|TestMountWardKdlExecFromRealBundle|TestSmartDefaultsFromBundleSource|TestSelectConfigSourceReconstructsCoilycoTargetFromCheckout|TestLaunchConfigRefReconstructsCoilycoTargetFromCheckout|TestDirectorSurfaceConfigRefUsesCurrentHead|TestAdvisorDefaultsTailnetOn|TestAdvisorNoTailnetOptOut'` slice passes. The repo-wide Forgejo job still fails on the broader `go test ./...` baseline, with unrelated red tests such as `TestCapabilityGuardfilesExist`, `TestExecAssetsMirrorWardKDL`, `TestMountWardKdlExecMountsNewSurfaces`, and `TestBacklogRefreshReservationStates`. Confidence: medium. Follow-up: repair the wider test baseline, then rerun the PR checks.

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-requests-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default. The config-source fix is in and the focused `go test ./cmd/ward -run 'TestRunSetupWithUnsetRef|TestBuildForgejoOpsFromRealBundle|TestMountWardKdlExecFromRealBundle|TestSmartDefaultsFromBundleSource|TestSelectConfigSourceReconstructsCoilycoTargetFromCheckout|TestLaunchConfigRefReconstructsCoilycoTargetFromCheckout|TestDirectorSurfaceConfigRefUsesCurrentHead|TestAdvisorDefaultsTailnetOn|TestAdvisorNoTailnetOptOut'` slice passes. The repo-wide Forgejo job still fails on the broader `go test ./...` baseline, with unrelated red tests such as `TestCapabilityGuardfilesExist`, `TestExecAssetsMirrorWardKDL`, `TestMountWardKdlExecMountsNewSurfaces`, and `TestBacklogRefreshReservationStates`. Confidence: medium. Follow-up: repair the wider test baseline, then rerun the PR checks. </details>

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 19:30:45 +00:00

Author

Member

Post-mortem (director surface): PR #1066 for this issue was closed. It reintroduced .ward/ward-kdl/ specgen bundle files, which ward#1009 deleted and forbids restoring. This issue stays open. When the ward open-PR queue is under the backpressure threshold (6), re-cut a clean fix off current main that touches CONSUMER CODE ONLY and never restores .ward/ward-kdl/.

Post-mortem (director surface): PR #1066 for this issue was closed. It reintroduced `.ward/ward-kdl/` specgen bundle files, which ward#1009 deleted and forbids restoring. This issue stays open. When the ward open-PR queue is under the backpressure threshold (6), re-cut a clean fix off current main that touches CONSUMER CODE ONLY and never restores `.ward/ward-kdl/`.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 23:39:50 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-1000 on host KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-10T23:39:50Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000 · branch issue-1000 · harness codex · workflow pull-requests-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1000 · ward v0.605.0 · dispatched 2026-07-10T23:39:50Z
Comment thread: 5 included in the pre-flight read, 2 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:53:38Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:56:47Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:05:43Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:11:51Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T19:30:45Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:38:29Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.605.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-1000` on host `KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-10T23:39:50Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000` · branch `issue-1000` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-requests-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1000` · ward `v0.605.0` · dispatched `2026-07-10T23:39:50Z` - **Comment thread:** 5 included in the pre-flight read, 2 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:53:38Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T09:56:47Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:05:43Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:11:51Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T19:30:45Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:38:29Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.605.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilysiren referenced this issue

2026-07-14 15:27:09 +00:00

director should emit colorized, space buffered, visually distinct messages about the categories of actions its performing on startup #1283

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 15:29:05 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1000 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-14T15:29:04Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000 · branch issue-1000 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1000 · ward v0.686.0 · dispatched 2026-07-14T15:28:54Z
Comment thread: 2 included in the pre-flight read, 3 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:05:43Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T19:30:45Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:38:29Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:39:50Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.686.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1000` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-14T15:29:04Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000` · branch `issue-1000` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1000` · ward `v0.686.0` · dispatched `2026-07-14T15:28:54Z` - **Comment thread:** 2 included in the pre-flight read, 3 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:05:43Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T19:30:45Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:38:29Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:39:50Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.686.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-14 15:43:01 +00:00

Export coilyco config refs in ward containers #1287

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 15:48:11 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA.

Status: branch pushed and PR open at #1287. Targeted go test ./cmd/ward -run 'TestWardEnvCoilycoConfigRef|TestRunSetupWithUnsetRef|TestSmartDefaultsFromBundleSource|TestSelectConfigSourceReconstructsCoilycoTargetFromCheckout' passed locally. The repo-wide ward exec test and pre-commit run --all-files were blocked here by container temp-space limits, and no Forgejo Actions run surfaced for issue-1000 yet.

Felt: the code change was a tight env-export fix, but verification got pinned by the container filesystem ceiling.

Confidence: medium. Surprise: the PR opened cleanly, but CI never surfaced a branch run in the task feed.

Follow-ups: clear the temp-space blocker, rerun the full ward gate, and then merge once Forgejo shows the branch green.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary>workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA. Status: branch pushed and PR open at https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1287. Targeted `go test ./cmd/ward -run 'TestWardEnvCoilycoConfigRef|TestRunSetupWithUnsetRef|TestSmartDefaultsFromBundleSource|TestSelectConfigSourceReconstructsCoilycoTargetFromCheckout'` passed locally. The repo-wide `ward exec test` and `pre-commit run --all-files` were blocked here by container temp-space limits, and no Forgejo Actions run surfaced for issue-1000 yet. Felt: the code change was a tight env-export fix, but verification got pinned by the container filesystem ceiling. Confidence: medium. Surprise: the PR opened cleanly, but CI never surfaced a branch run in the task feed. Follow-ups: clear the temp-space blocker, rerun the full ward gate, and then merge once Forgejo shows the branch green. </details>

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 18:47:31 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1000 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-14T18:47:31Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000 · branch issue-1000 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1000 · ward v0.689.0 · dispatched 2026-07-14T18:47:21Z
Comment thread: 3 included in the pre-flight read, 4 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:05:43Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T19:30:45Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:48:11Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:38:29Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:39:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:29:05Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.689.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1000` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-14T18:47:31Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000` · branch `issue-1000` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1000` · ward `v0.689.0` · dispatched `2026-07-14T18:47:21Z` - **Comment thread:** 3 included in the pre-flight read, 4 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:05:43Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T19:30:45Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:48:11Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:38:29Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:39:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:29:05Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.689.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 18:55:51 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1287

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA.
Status: branch is current with main locally, full ward exec test and pre-commit run --all-files passed, and PR #1287 is green.
Felt: tight env-export plumbing.
Confidence: high.
Surprise: the PR page lagged behind the live status API after the merge push.
Follow-up: director merge.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1287 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA. Status: branch is current with main locally, full `ward exec test` and `pre-commit run --all-files` passed, and PR #1287 is green. Felt: tight env-export plumbing. Confidence: high. Surprise: the PR page lagged behind the live status API after the merge push. Follow-up: director merge. </details>

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 00:58:57 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1000 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T00:58:56Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000 · branch issue-1000 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1000 · ward v0.693.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T00:58:46Z
Comment thread: 4 included in the pre-flight read, 5 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:05:43Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T19:30:45Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:48:11Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:55:51Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:38:29Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:39:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:29:05Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:47:31Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.693.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1000` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T00:58:56Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000` · branch `issue-1000` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1000` · ward `v0.693.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T00:58:46Z` - **Comment thread:** 4 included in the pre-flight read, 5 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:05:43Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T19:30:45Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:48:11Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:55:51Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:38:29Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:39:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:29:05Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:47:31Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.693.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 01:04:17 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1287

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA. Status: branch merged current main locally, `ward exec test` and `pre-commit run --all-files` passed, and the PR is green. Felt: this was mostly branch sync and verification, not a code chase. Confidence: high. Surprise: the PR already had the fix, so the work reduced to proving and syncing it. Follow-up: director merge.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1287 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA. Status: branch merged current main locally, `ward exec test` and `pre-commit run --all-files` passed, and the PR is green. Felt: this was mostly branch sync and verification, not a code chase. Confidence: high. Surprise: the PR already had the fix, so the work reduced to proving and syncing it. Follow-up: director merge. </details>

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 01:06:25 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1000 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T01:06:25Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000 · branch issue-1000 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1000 · ward v0.693.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T01:06:15Z
Comment thread: 5 included in the pre-flight read, 6 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:05:43Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T19:30:45Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:48:11Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:55:51Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T01:04:17Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:38:29Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:39:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:29:05Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:47:31Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T00:58:57Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.693.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1000` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T01:06:25Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1000` · branch `issue-1000` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1000` · ward `v0.693.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T01:06:15Z` - **Comment thread:** 5 included in the pre-flight read, 6 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T18:05:43Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T19:30:45Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:48:11Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:55:51Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T01:04:17Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T10:00:04Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:38:29Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:39:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:29:05Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:47:31Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T00:58:57Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.693.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 01:11:13 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1287

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA. Status: branch is green. `ward exec test` passed locally, and Forgejo task run 2060 for PR #1287 is successful. Felt: the fix was already present, so this was mostly verification and landing hygiene. Confidence: high. Surprise: the live PR checks were already green when I checked. Follow-up: director merge.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1287 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA. Status: branch is green. `ward exec test` passed locally, and Forgejo task run 2060 for PR #1287 is successful. Felt: the fix was already present, so this was mostly verification and landing hygiene. Confidence: high. Surprise: the live PR checks were already green when I checked. Follow-up: director merge. </details>

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-15 01:11:38 +00:00

Rows
Columns

Make ward exec repo verbs use the coilyco config bundle in ward containers #1000

Problem

Acceptance criteria