Run ward-mcp CI in aos dev-base #13
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
The dev-base scan found
.forgejo/workflows/ci.ymlusingactions/setup-goand downloading Docker CLI fromdownload.docker.com. The pinned aos dev-base image already ships Go and Docker CLI.Acceptance criteria:
actions/setup-goand Docker CLI tarball install when dev-base supplies those tools.🔒 Reserved by
ward agent --harness codex— containerengineer-codex-ward-mcp-13on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.localis carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T03:55:56Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL);--forceoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilyco-flight-deck/ward-mcp#13· branchissue-13· harnesscodex· workflowprengineer-codex-ward-mcp-13· wardv0.470.0· dispatched2026-07-09T03:55:56ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.470.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentcoilyco-ops referenced this issue2026-07-09 03:59:36 +00:00
WARD-OUTCOME: done - CI now runs gate and publish in the pinned aos dev-base image.
Review gate skipped because --skip-preflight / --no-preflight also skips review.
The edit was straightforward once the container pin was identified, and the Docker host probing stayed intact. Confidence is high. The only rough edge was keeping the docs aligned with the workflow change.
⚠️ Reopened: this run's work did not land on
mainAn ephemeral
ward container(codex mode) dispatched for this issue finished but its work was not merged tomain, so the reaper preserved it on a branch before teardown and reopened the issue (a closing reference for #13 never reachedmain). Recover from the salvage branch below.coilyco-flight-deck/ward-mcpward-salvage/ward-mcp-558b4977Reap diagnostics
Recover
— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒
reservation details
Holder: container
engineer-codex-ward-mcp-13on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Reserved by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-09T22:40:23Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL).--forceoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilyco-flight-deck/ward-mcp#13· branchissue-13· harnesscodex· workflowdirect-mainengineer-codex-ward-mcp-13· wardv0.540.0· dispatched2026-07-09T22:40:23ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.540.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-OUTCOME: done
details
workflow: direct-main; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default Recovered the prior dev-base workflow change from the salvage branch, kept GOPRIVATE intact, and landed the minimal closure commit on `main`. Confidence: high. Surprise: the salvage branch already contained the intended workflow edit, so the only live fix was closure hygiene. Follow-up: none.