coilyco-flight-deck/ward-mcp
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Run ward-mcp CI in aos dev-base #14

Merged
coilyco-ops merged 1 commit from issue-13 into main 2026-07-09 15:52:42 +00:00
Conversation 2 Commits 1 Files changed 3 +18 -28
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-09 03:59:36 +00:00
Member
Copy link

closes #14
ward.workflow: pull-request-and-merge

closes #14 ward.workflow: pull-request-and-merge
fix: run CI in dev-base
All checks were successful
ci / gate (pull_request) Successful in 11s
Details
ci / publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
ci / gate (push) Successful in 12s
Details
ci / publish (push) Has been skipped
Details
5c4d11382d
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-09 15:48:28 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-mcp-14 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-09T15:48:26Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward-mcp#14 · branch issue-14 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-ward-mcp-14 · ward v0.493.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T15:48:26Z
  • Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-mcp-14` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-09T15:48:26Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward-mcp#14` · branch `issue-14` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-mcp-14` · ward `v0.493.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T15:48:26Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-09 15:53:05 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate.
Implementation felt straightforward because the salvage branch already had the exact CI/doc fix.
Confidence: high. Surprise: PR 14 was still pointing at the old issue-13 head, but the branch state and checks were already green.
Follow-ups: none.

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅ <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate. Implementation felt straightforward because the salvage branch already had the exact CI/doc fix. Confidence: high. Surprise: PR 14 was still pointing at the old `issue-13` head, but the branch state and checks were already green. Follow-ups: none. </details>
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
  
coherence-core
Core review set for the warded control plane coherence milestone. These issues form the release spine; adjacent milestone issues are stretch or supporting work.

  
consult
A human decision, design, or external action must happen first. Fail-closed default for unlabeled/low-confidence.

  
headless
Agent can take it from open issue to merged change with no human in the loop. The auto-burndown queue.

  
interactive
Agent does the work but pauses at a human checkpoint mid-flight (design choice, destructive step, human-only verification).

  
P0
now / blocking / urgent

  
P1
next / important

  
P2
backlog / will do

  
P3
someday / low

  
P4
icebox / frozen / reopen if it becomes real

No labels
coherence-core
consult
headless
interactive
P0
P1
P2
P3
P4
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/ward-mcp!14
No description provided.