Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-09T15:48:59Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/backend#37 · branch issue-37 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-backend-37 · ward v0.493.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T15:48:59Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-backend-37` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-09T15:48:59Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/backend#37` · branch `issue-37` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-backend-37` · ward `v0.493.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T15:48:59Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops added 1 commit

2026-07-09 15:58:48 +00:00

docs: clarify dev-base bootstrap surface 4d80e838a6

coilyco-ops merged commit d0552a5274 into main

2026-07-09 15:58:51 +00:00

coilyco-ops referenced this pull request from a commit

2026-07-09 15:58:52 +00:00

Merge pull request 'Run backend CI/deploy workflow in aos dev-base' (#37) from issue-36 into main

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 16:09:10 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate) Merged the PR, then watched the push-to-main run fail in `Roll deployment` because kubectl fell back to `localhost:8080`. The kubeconfig secrets are not landing in the workflow env, so the deploy step is blocked on external secret state, not repo code. Felt straightforward until the cluster auth path disappeared. Confidence: medium. Surprise: the failure was immediate, which points at missing kubeconfig material rather than a rollout crash. Follow-up: provision the repo deploy kubeconfig secrets or wire this workflow to the canonical working secret set.

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate) Merged the PR, then watched the push-to-main run fail in `Roll deployment` because kubectl fell back to `localhost:8080`. The kubeconfig secrets are not landing in the workflow env, so the deploy step is blocked on external secret state, not repo code. Felt straightforward until the cluster auth path disappeared. Confidence: medium. Surprise: the failure was immediate, which points at missing kubeconfig material rather than a rollout crash. Follow-up: provision the repo deploy kubeconfig secrets or wire this workflow to the canonical working secret set. </details>