Repair post-merge CI failure after dev-base publish recovery #580

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-15 09:47:59 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 4 comments

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 09:47:59 +00:00

Member

Merged PR #579 restored the combined dev-base retry/resume and release-retag wait behavior, but its exact main head immediately failed post-merge CI.

Evidence:

PR #579 passed ci / gate and ci / ward-doctor on head e9eac1668e6fd41081fdb7457bae8819218d4081 and merged.
The resulting main SHA is aff69a6e8a66a449fbb54a6a85b4df7ea76aaa1e.
Push-triggered ci.yml action run 8428 / repository run #1414 failed in 13 seconds.
promote.yml run 8430 / #1416 and mirror run 8429 / #1415 were still running when this issue was filed.
The implementation engineer for #578 had exited, and no open issue captured this exact main-CI failure.

Diagnose the fast post-merge CI failure on exact main SHA aff69a6e, repair any reproducible problem without regressing the merged #579 behavior, and leave the main/release image path green. If it is a transient runner failure, use the smallest supported auditable retrigger and record the successful exact-head run.

Acceptance:

The failure point in run 8428 is identified.
Any code or workflow defect is repaired with focused coverage.
Required PR CI is green for a repair change, if one is needed.
Main CI and promote are green for the repaired or intentionally retriggered head.
A new dev-base publish attempt is started or the exact remaining publication blocker is recorded.

Merged PR #579 restored the combined dev-base retry/resume and release-retag wait behavior, but its exact main head immediately failed post-merge CI. Evidence: * PR #579 passed `ci / gate` and `ci / ward-doctor` on head `e9eac1668e6fd41081fdb7457bae8819218d4081` and merged. * The resulting main SHA is `aff69a6e8a66a449fbb54a6a85b4df7ea76aaa1e`. * Push-triggered `ci.yml` action run 8428 / repository run #1414 failed in 13 seconds. * `promote.yml` run 8430 / #1416 and mirror run 8429 / #1415 were still running when this issue was filed. * The implementation engineer for #578 had exited, and no open issue captured this exact main-CI failure. Diagnose the fast post-merge CI failure on exact main SHA `aff69a6e`, repair any reproducible problem without regressing the merged #579 behavior, and leave the main/release image path green. If it is a transient runner failure, use the smallest supported auditable retrigger and record the successful exact-head run. Acceptance: * The failure point in run 8428 is identified. * Any code or workflow defect is repaired with focused coverage. * Required PR CI is green for a repair change, if one is needed. * Main CI and promote are green for the repaired or intentionally retriggered head. * A new dev-base publish attempt is started or the exact remaining publication blocker is recorded.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 09:48:10 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-agentic-os-580 on host 74a70515a491.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T09:48:10Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#580 · branch issue-580 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-agentic-os-580 · ward v0.710.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T09:48:08Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-agentic-os-580` on host `74a70515a491`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T09:48:10Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#580` · branch `issue-580` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agentic-os-580` · ward `v0.710.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T09:48:08Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 09:48:43 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: dispatch-deferred

launch failure details

The repair run never started. warded engineer coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#580 --harness codex --workflow pull-request-and-merge failed before container creation because forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os-full:latest was unavailable remotely and no local image existed. Docker has no engineer-codex-agentic-os-580 container. No implementation work was performed.

The reservation is released for redispatch from a fresh director. Issue #580 remains the concrete repair for failed main CI run 8428 on SHA aff69a6e8a66a449fbb54a6a85b4df7ea76aaa1e.

Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: dispatch-deferred <details><summary>launch failure details</summary> The repair run never started. `warded engineer coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#580 --harness codex --workflow pull-request-and-merge` failed before container creation because `forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os-full:latest` was unavailable remotely and no local image existed. Docker has no `engineer-codex-agentic-os-580` container. No implementation work was performed. The reservation is released for redispatch from a fresh director. Issue #580 remains the concrete repair for failed main CI run 8428 on SHA `aff69a6e8a66a449fbb54a6a85b4df7ea76aaa1e`. </details>  - Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 10:07:02 +00:00

Author

Member

Additional exact-head evidence: dev-base-publish.yml run 8432 / repository run #1417 also failed on the same main SHA aff69a6e8a66a449fbb54a6a85b4df7ea76aaa1e. It ran from 09:48:16Z to 10:04:39Z. Promote run 8430 and mirror run 8429 succeeded, but agentic-os-full:latest remains absent (manifest unknown). The #580 repair therefore needs to diagnose both the fast main-CI failure in run 8428 and the publication failure in run 8432, while preserving merged PR #579 behavior.

Additional exact-head evidence: `dev-base-publish.yml` run 8432 / repository run #1417 also failed on the same main SHA `aff69a6e8a66a449fbb54a6a85b4df7ea76aaa1e`. It ran from 09:48:16Z to 10:04:39Z. Promote run 8430 and mirror run 8429 succeeded, but `agentic-os-full:latest` remains absent (`manifest unknown`). The #580 repair therefore needs to diagnose both the fast main-CI failure in run 8428 and the publication failure in run 8432, while preserving merged PR #579 behavior.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 10:36:47 +00:00

Author

Member

Main-CI acceptance is now satisfied on the repaired head from PR #582: ci.yml run 8459 / #1420 succeeded and promote run 8461 / #1422 succeeded on SHA 81cdc64dc05283f4b2d55e65b33093c0edf3df28. The remaining publication failure is distinct and captured separately with exact run 8463 evidence. Closing this post-merge CI issue.

Main-CI acceptance is now satisfied on the repaired head from PR #582: `ci.yml` run 8459 / #1420 succeeded and promote run 8461 / #1422 succeeded on SHA `81cdc64dc05283f4b2d55e65b33093c0edf3df28`. The remaining publication failure is distinct and captured separately with exact run 8463 evidence. Closing this post-merge CI issue.

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-15 10:36:48 +00:00