Run Forgejo CI in aos dev-base #35

Merged

coilyco-ops merged 5 commits from issue-34 into main 2026-07-09 16:06:57 +00:00

Conversation 2 Commits 5 Files changed 5 +24 -26

coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-09 03:57:14 +00:00

Member

Copy link

closes #34

closes #34

coilyco-ops added 1 commit 2026-07-09 03:57:14 +00:00

ci: run on aos dev-base 697dfb403d

coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-09 15:49:25 +00:00

Author

Member

Copy link

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-agent-proxy-35 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-09T15:49:22Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

• Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agent-proxy#35 · branch issue-35 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
• Run: engineer-codex-agent-proxy-35 · ward v0.493.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T15:49:22Z
• Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-agent-proxy-35` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-09T15:49:22Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agent-proxy#35` · branch `issue-35` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agent-proxy-35` · ward `v0.493.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T15:49:22Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops added 1 commit 2026-07-09 16:00:00 +00:00

ci: make dev-base test gate self-contained c003ccd504

coilyco-ops added 1 commit 2026-07-09 16:00:57 +00:00

ci: keep dev-base lint deps available 10c688b839

coilyco-ops added 1 commit 2026-07-09 16:04:13 +00:00

ci: run dev-base gate via repo scripts e58f2015c8

coilyco-ops added 1 commit 2026-07-09 16:05:49 +00:00

ci: use direct smoke scripts in dev-base eb114ae6aa

coilyco-ops merged commit 1ad55f1333 into main 2026-07-09 16:06:57 +00:00

coilyco-ops referenced this pull request from a commit 2026-07-09 16:06:59 +00:00

Merge pull request 'Run Forgejo CI in aos dev-base' (#35) from issue-34 into main

coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-09 16:07:36 +00:00

Author

Member

Copy link

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate)
retrospective: the fix was mostly about matching Forgejo's detached checkout behavior.
confidence: high
surprises: ward repo verbs require a branch with upstream, so CI had to use direct scripts.
follow-ups: none

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅ <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate) retrospective: the fix was mostly about matching Forgejo's detached checkout behavior. confidence: high surprises: ward repo verbs require a branch with upstream, so CI had to use direct scripts. follow-ups: none </details>

Sign in to join this conversation.

Reviewers

No reviewers

Labels

Clear labels

  

coherence-core

Core review set for the warded control plane coherence milestone. These issues form the release spine; adjacent milestone issues are stretch or supporting work.

  

consult

A human decision, design, or external action must happen first. Fail-closed default for unlabeled/low-confidence.

  

headless

Agent can take it from open issue to merged change with no human in the loop. The auto-burndown queue.

  

interactive

Agent does the work but pauses at a human checkpoint mid-flight (design choice, destructive step, human-only verification).

  

P0

now / blocking / urgent

  

P1

next / important

  

P2

backlog / will do

  

P3

someday / low

  

P4

icebox / frozen / reopen if it becomes real

No labels

coherence-core

consult

headless

interactive

P0

P1

P2

P3

P4

Milestone

Clear milestone

No items

No milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No items

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Subscribe

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

coilyco-flight-deck/agent-proxy!35

No description provided.