Run Forgejo CI in aos dev-base #34

Closed
opened 2026-07-09 03:51:58 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 3 comments
Member

The dev-base scan found .forgejo/workflows/ci.yml using astral-sh/setup-uv@v5 in both jobs. The pinned aos dev-base image already ships uv, managed Python, and ward.

Acceptance criteria:

  • Run the quality and smoke jobs in forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os:v0.195.0 or the current pinned dev-base tag.
  • Remove astral-sh/setup-uv from those jobs.
  • Prefer invoking the repo's ward verbs if they match the current commands; otherwise keep the existing uv commands with dev-base-provided uv.
  • Preserve daemonless/tower-less job boundaries.
The dev-base scan found `.forgejo/workflows/ci.yml` using `astral-sh/setup-uv@v5` in both jobs. The pinned aos dev-base image already ships uv, managed Python, and ward. Acceptance criteria: * Run the quality and smoke jobs in `forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os:v0.195.0` or the current pinned dev-base tag. * Remove `astral-sh/setup-uv` from those jobs. * Prefer invoking the repo's ward verbs if they match the current commands; otherwise keep the existing uv commands with dev-base-provided uv. * Preserve daemonless/tower-less job boundaries.
Author
Member

🔒 Reserved by ward agent --harness codex — container engineer-codex-agent-proxy-34 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T03:53:06Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agent-proxy#34 · branch issue-34 · harness codex · workflow pr
  • Run: engineer-codex-agent-proxy-34 · ward v0.470.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T03:53:06Z
  • Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.470.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> 🔒 Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` — container `engineer-codex-agent-proxy-34` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local` is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T03:53:06Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh** — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agent-proxy#34` · branch `issue-34` · harness `codex` · workflow `pr` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agent-proxy-34` · ward `v0.470.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T03:53:06Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.470.0). </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
Author
Member

WARD-OUTCOME: done - CI now runs in the pinned aos dev-base image without setup-uv, using ward exec for test, boot-probe, and smoke.
Review gate skipped because --skip-preflight / --no-preflight also skips review.
This was mostly a workflow reshuffle, but the local ward audit path and the missing gh binary fought back a bit, so I had to use the Forgejo API directly. Confidence is high because ward test, ward smoke, and ward boot-probe all passed locally. The main rough edge left is that the workflow still relies on uv sync for dev dependencies inside the dev-base image.

WARD-OUTCOME: done - CI now runs in the pinned aos dev-base image without setup-uv, using ward exec for test, boot-probe, and smoke. Review gate skipped because --skip-preflight / --no-preflight also skips review. This was mostly a workflow reshuffle, but the local ward audit path and the missing gh binary fought back a bit, so I had to use the Forgejo API directly. Confidence is high because ward test, ward smoke, and ward boot-probe all passed locally. The main rough edge left is that the workflow still relies on uv sync for dev dependencies inside the dev-base image.
Author
Member

⚠️ Reopened: this run's work did not land on main

An ephemeral ward container (codex mode) dispatched for this issue finished but its work was not merged to main, so the reaper preserved it on a branch before teardown and reopened the issue (a closing reference for #34 never reached main). Recover from the salvage branch below.

  • Repo: coilyco-flight-deck/agent-proxy
  • Salvage branch: ward-salvage/agent-proxy-09877ee0
  • Pull request: not opened - PR creation failed: forgejo: parse created pull request: unexpected end of JSON input
  • Reason: run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only)
  • Container uptime at reap: 4m (age of the baked Forgejo PAT snapshot; a long-lived container is likelier to carry a rotated token)

Reap diagnostics

--- reap diagnostics ---
ward version:      v0.470.0
version source:    pinned via WARD_VERSION/--ward-version (v0.470.0)
HEAD:              697dfb403df5
origin/main:       ec85c79748d9
ancestry:          HEAD is NOT yet on origin/main - residual work remains to land
decision gate:     workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only)
reason:            run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only)
provenance:        not read (workflow hold)
run-owned landed:  no
working tree:      clean
container uptime:  4m (baked Forgejo PAT age proxy)
--- end reap diagnostics ---

Recover

git fetch https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agent-proxy.git ward-salvage/agent-proxy-09877ee0
git checkout -b ward-salvage/agent-proxy-09877ee0 FETCH_HEAD

— Codex, via ward agent

## ⚠️ Reopened: this run's work did not land on `main` An ephemeral `ward container` (codex mode) dispatched for this issue finished but its work was **not merged to `main`**, so the reaper preserved it on a branch before teardown and reopened the issue (a closing reference for #34 never reached `main`). Recover from the salvage branch below. - **Repo:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agent-proxy` - **Salvage branch:** `ward-salvage/agent-proxy-09877ee0` - **Pull request:** not opened - PR creation failed: forgejo: parse created pull request: unexpected end of JSON input - **Reason:** run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only) - **Container uptime at reap:** 4m (age of the baked Forgejo PAT snapshot; a long-lived container is likelier to carry a rotated token) ## Reap diagnostics ``` --- reap diagnostics --- ward version: v0.470.0 version source: pinned via WARD_VERSION/--ward-version (v0.470.0) HEAD: 697dfb403df5 origin/main: ec85c79748d9 ancestry: HEAD is NOT yet on origin/main - residual work remains to land decision gate: workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only) reason: run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only) provenance: not read (workflow hold) run-owned landed: no working tree: clean container uptime: 4m (baked Forgejo PAT age proxy) --- end reap diagnostics --- ``` ## Recover ```bash git fetch https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agent-proxy.git ward-salvage/agent-proxy-09877ee0 git checkout -b ward-salvage/agent-proxy-09877ee0 FETCH_HEAD ``` <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.