Deploy Gatsby site from k3s staging hostname #70
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Goal
Add a k3s-hosted deployment path for this Gatsby site so iteration can happen from the homelab instead of waiting on Netlify. Use
website.coilysiren.meas the provisional staging hostname unless a stronger existing convention appears during implementation. Keepcoilysiren.meon Netlify for now.Context already checked
README.mdanddocs/FEATURES.mdcurrently document Netlify as the deploy path./substrate/infrastructure/docs/k3s-deploy-notes.mdis the authoritative k3s reference. Its first-time checklist says a new app repo ownsDockerfile, deploy manifest, workflow, andconfig.yml.*.coilysiren.metraffic should use Traefik Ingress on k3s. Host Caddy is tailnet shortcut glue, not the public path.ingressClassName: traefikandcert-manager.io/cluster-issuer: letsencrypt-production.Implementation sketch
public/output on$PORTor port 80.config.yml,deploy/main.yml, and the Makefile or ward-compatible equivalent the canonical workflow expects./substrate/infrastructure/docs/k3s-deploy-notes-gha-workflow*.md.README.mdanddocs/FEATURES.mdso the deploy inventory says Netlify remains apex production while k3s serves the staging/iteration hostname.Acceptance criteria
website.coilysiren.meis the staged k3s hostname in tracked config.Follow-up that may be needed outside code
If the Route 53 A record or repo secrets are missing, add an issue comment with the exact missing external setup and keep all code changes landed. The k3s checklist names the record and secret set.
WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒
reservation details
Holder: container
engineer-codex-website-70on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Reserved by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-09T22:50:06Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL).--forceoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilysiren/website#70· branchissue-70· harnesscodex· workflowdirect-mainengineer-codex-website-70· wardv0.540.0· dispatched2026-07-09T22:50:06ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.540.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-RESERVATION: released 🛑
release details
Run never started.
ward container reapreleased containerengineer-codex-website-70(--harness codex): it exited without launching the agent (smoke-test death, ward#222/#264/#595), so it did no work and the hold it took is retracted. Nothing is running on this issue. It needs re-dispatch. Award agent directorre-queues it automatically. A manualward agentretry no longer needs--force.— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-DISPATCH: failed ❌
failure details
This forwarded dispatch failed after the issue was already reserved.
Attempted harness:
codexAttempted run:
ward agent engineer coilysiren/website#70 --harness codexContainer:
engineer-codex-website-70Container created: no running engineer was observed.
Host log:
/Users/kai/.ward/agent-logs/dispatch/20260709T225001Z-director-codex-hd68-coilysiren-website-70.logFailure:
ward: no GitHub token found - set GITHUB_TOKEN (or GH_TOKEN / WARD_GITHUB_TOKEN) to a token with repo scope, or set WARD_GITHUB_TOKEN_SOURCE=gh to mint one from yourghlogin; ward reads GitHub tokens only from the environment, never SSM (ward#489). See docs/agent-github.mdRetry: choose another harness if the first one is down, or rerun with
--forceif the reservation is stale.— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒
reservation details
Holder: container
engineer-codex-website-70on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Reserved by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-09T22:50:44Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL).--forceoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilysiren/website#70· branchissue-70· harnesscodex· workflowdirect-mainengineer-codex-website-70· wardv0.540.0· dispatched2026-07-09T22:50:44ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.540.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-RESERVATION: released 🛑
release details
Run never started.
ward container reapreleased containerengineer-codex-website-70(--harness codex): it exited without launching the agent (smoke-test death, ward#222/#264/#595), so it did no work and the hold it took is retracted. Nothing is running on this issue. It needs re-dispatch. Award agent directorre-queues it automatically. A manualward agentretry no longer needs--force.— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-DISPATCH: failed ❌
failure details
This forwarded dispatch failed after the issue was already reserved.
Attempted harness:
codexAttempted run:
ward agent engineer coilysiren/website#70 --harness codexContainer:
engineer-codex-website-70Container created: no running engineer was observed.
Host log:
/Users/kai/.ward/agent-logs/dispatch/20260709T225039Z-director-codex-hd68-coilysiren-website-70.logFailure:
ward: no GitHub token found - set GITHUB_TOKEN (or GH_TOKEN / WARD_GITHUB_TOKEN) to a token with repo scope, or set WARD_GITHUB_TOKEN_SOURCE=gh to mint one from yourghlogin; ward reads GitHub tokens only from the environment, never SSM (ward#489). See docs/agent-github.mdRetry: choose another harness if the first one is down, or rerun with
--forceif the reservation is stale.— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒
reservation details
Holder: container
engineer-codex-website-70on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Reserved by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-09T22:51:22Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL).--forceoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilysiren/website#70· branchissue-70· harnesscodex· workflowdirect-mainengineer-codex-website-70· wardv0.540.0· dispatched2026-07-09T22:51:22ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.540.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-RESERVATION: released 🛑
release details
Run never started.
ward container reapreleased containerengineer-codex-website-70(--harness codex): it exited without launching the agent (smoke-test death, ward#222/#264/#595), so it did no work and the hold it took is retracted. Nothing is running on this issue. It needs re-dispatch. Award agent directorre-queues it automatically. A manualward agentretry no longer needs--force.— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-DISPATCH: failed ❌
failure details
This forwarded dispatch failed after the issue was already reserved.
Attempted harness:
codexAttempted run:
ward agent engineer coilysiren/website#70 --harness codexContainer:
engineer-codex-website-70Container created: no running engineer was observed.
Host log:
/Users/kai/.ward/agent-logs/dispatch/20260709T225117Z-director-codex-hd68-coilysiren-website-70.logFailure:
ward: no GitHub token found - set GITHUB_TOKEN (or GH_TOKEN / WARD_GITHUB_TOKEN) to a token with repo scope, or set WARD_GITHUB_TOKEN_SOURCE=gh to mint one from yourghlogin; ward reads GitHub tokens only from the environment, never SSM (ward#489). See docs/agent-github.mdRetry: choose another harness if the first one is down, or rerun with
--forceif the reservation is stale.— Codex, via
ward agentDirector note, 2026-07-09: the read-only surface filed this from Kai’s request to host an iterable k3s version of the website. Two dispatch attempts were made from
/workspace/website:warded engineer coilysiren/website#70 --harness codexwarded engineer #70 --harness codex\n*warded engineer #70\n\nAll stopped before launching with the same broker preflight:no GitHub token found - set GITHUB_TOKEN (or GH_TOKEN / WARD_GITHUB_TOKEN) to a token with repo scope, or set WARD_GITHUB_TOKEN_SOURCE=gh to mint one from your gh login. The issue is ready for a sibling engineer once the dispatcher has the GitHub-lane token source it currently expects for this repo.Formatting correction for the dispatch note above. These were the attempted dispatch commands:
warded engineer coilysiren/website#70 --harness codexwarded engineer "#70" --harness codexwarded engineer "#70"Each attempt stopped before launching with the same broker preflight:
no GitHub token found. The captured implementation issue is still ready to run once the dispatcher has a GitHub token source for this repo.