Verify and upload Git LFS asset objects #6
Labels
No labels
autonomy
async-consult
autonomy
epic
autonomy
headless
autonomy
live-collab
c#
priority
P0
priority
P1
priority
P2
priority
P3
priority
P4
role/ai
role/creator
role/design
role/director
role/engineer
role/exec
role/human
role/ops
role/qa
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
coilyco-gaming/factory-game-v3#6
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Issue #4 landed commit
acc47e58(Track image assets with Git LFS) touching.gitattributesand the tracked image files. Kai now wants the game assets pushed into LFS, not just attributes/pointers in Git.Context from the read-only director surface:
git lfsis not available in the current surface container.acc47e58touched.gitattributesand all current image assets, so the pointer-conversion commit likely landed.Requested implementation:
mainafter #4/#5.git lfs ls-filesand confirm all intended image assets are tracked by LFS.git lfs pushcommand to upload missing LFS objects formain(for examplegit lfs push origin main, or--allif needed and appropriate).git lfs fetch/ checkout succeeds and the image files hydrate as real assets, not broken pointers.This issue is specifically about remote LFS object availability. Do not rework the broader repo baseline or asset policy here.
WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒
reservation details
Holder: container
engineer-codex-factory-game-v3-6on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Reserved by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-09T16:51:51Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL).--forceoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilyco-gaming/factory-game-v3#6· branchissue-6· harnesscodex· workflowdirect-to-mainengineer-codex-factory-game-v3-6· wardv0.493.0· dispatched2026-07-09T16:51:51ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-OUTCOME: done ✅
details
workflow: direct-to-main; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default
retrospective: the work was narrow and mostly verification. The only surprise was needing an arm64 git-lfs binary in the container to prove hydration end to end.
confidence: high
follow-ups: none