Bundle the web server as... helm chart maybe? #119
Labels
No labels
burndown-2026-06
headless
autonomy
async-consult
autonomy
epic
autonomy
headless
autonomy
live-collab
c#
priority
P0
priority
P1
priority
P2
priority
P3
priority
P4
role/ai
role/creator
role/design
role/director
role/engineer
role/exec
role/human
role/ops
role/qa
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
coilyco-gaming/eco-app#119
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Decision: keep eco-app on the established image plus deploy-manifest model. Do not add a Helm chart.
The repo already ships the portable unit, one fused OCI image with environment-driven configuration. The installation-specific namespace, ingress, ExternalSecrets, sidecars, and rollout logic correctly live one layer higher in
coilyco-bridge/deploy/services/eco-app. A chart here would duplicate deployment config across layers and create a distribution surface with no current consumer.This matches the repo boundary in AGENTS.md and the deployment-of-one posture. A Helm chart becomes justified only if eco-app gains multiple independent installers that need a supported values contract. That should be a new issue with those consumers and acceptance criteria, not speculative packaging here.
Closing with the current manifest pattern selected.