Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-09T16:08:21Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#807 · branch issue-807 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-807 · ward v0.493.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T16:08:21Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-807` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-09T16:08:21Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#807` · branch `issue-807` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-807` · ward `v0.493.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T16:08:21Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops merged commit 32861e7c76 into main

2026-07-09 16:11:55 +00:00

coilyco-ops referenced this pull request from a commit

2026-07-09 16:11:56 +00:00

Merge pull request 'fix: restore shared substrate ownership boundary' (#807) from issue-805 into main

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 16:12:18 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped because review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate

retrospective: the implementation was straightforward; the only surprise was that the remote PR body had drifted from the carried issue and needed a metadata refresh before merge.

confidence: high

surprises: the code change was already in the branch; the live work here was recovering and landing the abandoned PR cleanly.

follow-ups: none.

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅ <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped because review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate retrospective: the implementation was straightforward; the only surprise was that the remote PR body had drifted from the carried issue and needed a metadata refresh before merge. confidence: high surprises: the code change was already in the branch; the live work here was recovering and landing the abandoned PR cleanly. follow-ups: none. </details>