Fix forgejo bundle metadata selection #1058
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
burndown-2026-06
pressure-test
sunday-sprint
coherence-core
consult
headless
interactive
P0
P1
P2
P3
P4
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/ward!1058
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "issue-1049"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Selects the flat bundle's Forgejo ops entrypoint from
ward.bundle.kdlmetadata instead of a hardcoded consumer guardfile filename, keeping a compat path forguardfile.forgejo.kdlbundles.Repaired per operator dispatch on #1058: merged current
maininto the branch, preserved main's post-ward#1009 structure (no.ward/ward-kdl/file restored - that tree is byte-identical to main), and kept only this PR's consumer-code change. The earlier do-not-merge hold was overridden by that dispatch.Related rework: #1064. Operator-surface follow-up that shipped PR body edits: #1062.
closes #1049
ward.workflow: pull-request-and-merge
WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒
reservation details
Holder: container
engineer-claude-ward-1058on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Reserved by
ward agent --harness claude(reserved 2026-07-10T20:21:27Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL).--forceoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1058· branchissue-1058· harnessclaude· workflowpull-requests-and-mergeengineer-claude-ward-1058· wardv0.600.0· dispatched2026-07-10T20:21:27ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.600.0).
— Claude (she/her), via
ward agent