Remove director consult mode from ward release scope

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 02:25:13 +00:00

Owner

Remove ward agent director consult from the pre-release surface:

Remove the interactive consult command and supporting code.
Remove docs/tests that advertise consult as a director mode.
Keep director heartbeat, engineer dispatch, advisor dispatch, and triage behavior intact.

Rationale: consult is useful, but it is a standalone interactive workflow. The release core should focus on director dispatch and headless lane behavior.

Remove `ward agent director consult` from the pre-release surface: * Remove the interactive consult command and supporting code. * Remove docs/tests that advertise consult as a director mode. * Keep director heartbeat, engineer dispatch, advisor dispatch, and triage behavior intact. Rationale: consult is useful, but it is a standalone interactive workflow. The release core should focus on director dispatch and headless lane behavior.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 02:26:49 +00:00

Author

Owner

🔒 Reserved by ward agent --harness codex — container engineer-codex-ward-735 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T02:26:47Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#735 · branch issue-735 · harness codex · workflow pr
Run: engineer-codex-ward-735 · ward v0.470.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T02:26:47Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.470.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

🔒 Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` — container `engineer-codex-ward-735` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local` is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T02:26:47Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh** — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#735` · branch `issue-735` · harness `codex` · workflow `pr` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-735` · ward `v0.470.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T02:26:47Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.470.0). </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-09 02:32:46 +00:00

Remove director consult mode from ward release scope #742

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 02:33:00 +00:00

Author

Owner

WARD-OUTCOME: done - removed director consult mode and its docs/tests
Review gate skipped because --skip-preflight / --no-preflight also skips review.
The cut was straightforward once the consult command was isolated. The only surprise was that the repo-wide test target already fails in unrelated ollamaprobe and opencode packages, while the focused cmd/ward package test passed, so confidence in this change is high but the broader suite still has pre-existing noise.

WARD-OUTCOME: done - removed director consult mode and its docs/tests Review gate skipped because --skip-preflight / --no-preflight also skips review. The cut was straightforward once the consult command was isolated. The only surprise was that the repo-wide test target already fails in unrelated ollamaprobe and opencode packages, while the focused cmd/ward package test passed, so confidence in this change is high but the broader suite still has pre-existing noise.

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-09 02:33:13 +00:00

ward salvage: ward-salvage/ward-890e4d29 #743

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 02:33:13 +00:00

Author

Owner

⚠️ Reopened: this run's work did not land on `main`

An ephemeral ward container (codex mode) dispatched for this issue finished but its work was not merged to main, so the reaper preserved it on a branch before teardown and reopened the issue (a closing reference for #735 never reached main). Recover from the salvage branch below.

Repo: coilyco-flight-deck/ward
Salvage branch: ward-salvage/ward-890e4d29
Pull request: not opened - PR creation failed: forgejo: parse created pull request: unexpected end of JSON input
Reason: run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only)
Container uptime at reap: 6m (age of the baked Forgejo PAT snapshot; a long-lived container is likelier to carry a rotated token)

Reap diagnostics

--- reap diagnostics ---
ward version:      v0.470.0
version source:    pinned via WARD_VERSION/--ward-version (v0.470.0)
HEAD:              b4b1f6b4d37c
origin/main:       8cab230822ab
ancestry:          HEAD is NOT yet on origin/main - residual work remains to land
decision gate:     workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only)
reason:            run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only)
provenance:        not read (workflow hold)
run-owned landed:  no
working tree:      clean
container uptime:  6m (baked Forgejo PAT age proxy)
--- end reap diagnostics ---

Recover

git fetch https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward.git ward-salvage/ward-890e4d29
git checkout -b ward-salvage/ward-890e4d29 FETCH_HEAD

— Codex, via ward agent

## ⚠️ Reopened: this run's work did not land on `main` An ephemeral `ward container` (codex mode) dispatched for this issue finished but its work was **not merged to `main`**, so the reaper preserved it on a branch before teardown and reopened the issue (a closing reference for #735 never reached `main`). Recover from the salvage branch below. - **Repo:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward` - **Salvage branch:** `ward-salvage/ward-890e4d29` - **Pull request:** not opened - PR creation failed: forgejo: parse created pull request: unexpected end of JSON input - **Reason:** run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only) - **Container uptime at reap:** 6m (age of the baked Forgejo PAT snapshot; a long-lived container is likelier to carry a rotated token) ## Reap diagnostics ``` --- reap diagnostics --- ward version: v0.470.0 version source: pinned via WARD_VERSION/--ward-version (v0.470.0) HEAD: b4b1f6b4d37c origin/main: 8cab230822ab ancestry: HEAD is NOT yet on origin/main - residual work remains to land decision gate: workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only) reason: run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only) provenance: not read (workflow hold) run-owned landed: no working tree: clean container uptime: 6m (baked Forgejo PAT age proxy) --- end reap diagnostics --- ``` ## Recover ```bash git fetch https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward.git ward-salvage/ward-890e4d29 git checkout -b ward-salvage/ward-890e4d29 FETCH_HEAD ```  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops added the

labels

2026-07-09 07:27:19 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 07:27:20 +00:00

Author

Owner

Director PR sweep, 2026-07-09T07:26Z:

The stale PR(s) for this issue were closed after a full open-PR sweep showed they carried old branch history from before the recovery merges. Fresh run should start from current main and reapply only this issue: remove director consult mode while keeping director heartbeat, engineer dispatch, advisor dispatch, and triage behavior intact.

Director PR sweep, 2026-07-09T07:26Z: The stale PR(s) for this issue were closed after a full open-PR sweep showed they carried old branch history from before the recovery merges. Fresh run should start from current `main` and reapply only this issue: remove director consult mode while keeping director heartbeat, engineer dispatch, advisor dispatch, and triage behavior intact.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 07:27:23 +00:00

Author

Owner

🔒 Reserved by ward agent --harness codex — container engineer-codex-ward-735 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T07:27:21Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#735 · branch issue-735 · harness codex · workflow pr
Run: engineer-codex-ward-735 · ward v0.474.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T07:27:21Z
Comment thread: 3 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:00Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:13Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:20Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:26:49Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.474.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

🔒 Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` — container `engineer-codex-ward-735` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local` is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T07:27:21Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh** — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#735` · branch `issue-735` · harness `codex` · workflow `pr` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-735` · ward `v0.474.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T07:27:21Z` - **Comment thread:** 3 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:00Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:13Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:20Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:26:49Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.474.0). </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-09 07:33:16 +00:00

Remove director consult mode from ward release scope #773

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 07:33:33 +00:00

Author

Owner

WARD-OUTCOME: done - removed the director consult command, its docs/tests, and the stale label helper; PR opened
workflow: pr; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate)
The cut was mostly straightforward. The only surprise was a small lint fallout from a Forgejo helper that only existed for the removed consult label flip, so I removed that too. Confidence is high; the reference sweep did not leave any consult-command surfaces behind. No follow-up needed.

WARD-OUTCOME: done - removed the director consult command, its docs/tests, and the stale label helper; PR opened workflow: pr; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate) The cut was mostly straightforward. The only surprise was a small lint fallout from a Forgejo helper that only existed for the removed consult label flip, so I removed that too. Confidence is high; the reference sweep did not leave any consult-command surfaces behind. No follow-up needed.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 07:48:01 +00:00

Author

Owner

Director merge sweep note, 2026-07-09T07:48Z:

PR #773 is not mergeable right now because Forgejo Actions test failed on run 1159. The earlier worker posted WARD-OUTCOME done after opening the PR, but that is not sufficient for merge. A fresh worker should inspect the failing test action, update the existing PR branch, and only report success after the PR test is green. Do not re-carry stale branch history beyond what is already on this issue branch.

— Codex, via ward agent

Director merge sweep note, 2026-07-09T07:48Z: PR #773 is not mergeable right now because Forgejo Actions test failed on run 1159. The earlier worker posted WARD-OUTCOME done after opening the PR, but that is not sufficient for merge. A fresh worker should inspect the failing test action, update the existing PR branch, and only report success after the PR test is green. Do not re-carry stale branch history beyond what is already on this issue branch.  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 07:48:14 +00:00

Author

Owner

🔒 Reserved by ward agent --harness codex — container engineer-codex-ward-735 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T07:48:12Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#735 · branch issue-735 · harness codex · workflow pr
Run: engineer-codex-ward-735 · ward v0.480.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T07:48:12Z
Comment thread: 5 included in the pre-flight read, 2 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:00Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:13Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:20Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:33:33Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:48:01Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:26:49Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:23Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.480.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

🔒 Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` — container `engineer-codex-ward-735` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local` is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T07:48:12Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh** — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#735` · branch `issue-735` · harness `codex` · workflow `pr` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-735` · ward `v0.480.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T07:48:12Z` - **Comment thread:** 5 included in the pre-flight read, 2 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:00Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:13Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:20Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:33:33Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:48:01Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:26:49Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:23Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.480.0). </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 08:00:25 +00:00

Author

Owner

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked - review summary: blocked: codex: exit status 1: Reading additional input from stdin... OpenAI Codex v0.142.5 -------- workdir: /workspace/ward mod...

Review panel verdicts:

codex: ERROR: codex: exit status 1: Reading additional input from stdin... OpenAI Codex v0.142.5 -------- workdir: /workspace/ward model: gpt-5.5 provider: openai approval: never sandbox: read-only reasoning... (conf 0.00)
claude: ERROR: claude: exit status 1: {"type":"system","subtype":"hook_started","hook_id":"572fe857-1332-4dc1-9f47-e4f4f7da82d2","hook_name":"SessionStart:startup","hook_event":"SessionStart","uuid":"5c2fd858... (conf 0.00)
goose: ERROR: goose: exit status 1: error: No provider configured. Run 'goose configure' first. (conf 0.00)

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked - review summary: blocked: codex: exit status 1: Reading additional input from stdin... OpenAI Codex v0.142.5 -------- workdir: /workspace/ward mod... Review panel verdicts: - codex: ERROR: codex: exit status 1: Reading additional input from stdin... OpenAI Codex v0.142.5 -------- workdir: /workspace/ward model: gpt-5.5 provider: openai approval: never sandbox: read-only reasoning... (conf 0.00) - claude: ERROR: claude: exit status 1: {"type":"system","subtype":"hook_started","hook_id":"572fe857-1332-4dc1-9f47-e4f4f7da82d2","hook_name":"SessionStart:startup","hook_event":"SessionStart","uuid":"5c2fd858... (conf 0.00) - goose: ERROR: goose: exit status 1: error: No provider configured. Run 'goose configure' first. (conf 0.00)  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 08:01:18 +00:00

Author

Owner

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked - review gate could not run because the reviewer backend returned auth failures.
workflow: pr; review summary: blocked: codex: exit status 1: Reading additional input from stdin... OpenAI Codex v0.142.5 -------- workdir: /workspace/ward mod...
Implementation was straightforward on the code side. The merge brought in a stale helper that lint caught, so I removed it. The only hard stop was the reviewer backend auth failure, not the patch itself.

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked - review gate could not run because the reviewer backend returned auth failures. workflow: pr; review summary: blocked: codex: exit status 1: Reading additional input from stdin... OpenAI Codex v0.142.5 -------- workdir: /workspace/ward mod... Implementation was straightforward on the code side. The merge brought in a stale helper that lint caught, so I removed it. The only hard stop was the reviewer backend auth failure, not the patch itself.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 15:49:47 +00:00

Author

Owner

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-735 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-09T15:49:44Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#735 · branch issue-735 · harness codex · workflow pull-request
Run: engineer-codex-ward-735 · ward v0.493.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T15:49:44Z
Comment thread: 7 included in the pre-flight read, 3 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:00Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:13Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:20Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:33:33Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:48:01Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T08:00:25Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T08:01:18Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:26:49Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:23Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:48:14Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-735` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-09T15:49:44Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#735` · branch `issue-735` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-735` · ward `v0.493.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T15:49:44Z` - **Comment thread:** 7 included in the pre-flight read, 3 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:00Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:13Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:20Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:33:33Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:48:01Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T08:00:25Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T08:01:18Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:26:49Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:23Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:48:14Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue

2026-07-09 15:49:57 +00:00

Include open PRs in director managed burndown scope #804

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 16:02:23 +00:00

Author

Owner

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅

details

workflow: pr; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate)
Removed the standalone director consult command, its docs/tests, and the stale label helper. Director heartbeat, engineer dispatch, advisor dispatch, and triage remain intact.
Confidence is high. No follow-up needed.

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅ <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pr; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate) Removed the standalone director consult command, its docs/tests, and the stale label helper. Director heartbeat, engineer dispatch, advisor dispatch, and triage remain intact. Confidence is high. No follow-up needed. </details>

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 17:35:12 +00:00

Author

Owner

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-735 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-09T17:35:10Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#735 · branch issue-735 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-735 · ward v0.493.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T17:35:10Z
Comment thread: 8 included in the pre-flight read, 4 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:00Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:13Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:20Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:33:33Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:48:01Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T08:00:25Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T08:01:18Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T16:02:23Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:26:49Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:23Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:48:14Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T15:49:47Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-735` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-09T17:35:10Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#735` · branch `issue-735` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-735` · ward `v0.493.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T17:35:10Z` - **Comment thread:** 8 included in the pre-flight read, 4 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:00Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:33:13Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:20Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:33:33Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:48:01Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T08:00:25Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T08:01:18Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T16:02:23Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T02:26:49Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:27:23Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T07:48:14Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T15:49:47Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-09 17:44:11 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 17:44:46 +00:00

Author

Owner

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped, review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate.
The agent removed the standalone consult command, deleted the consult docs/tests, and kept heartbeat, engineer dispatch, advisor dispatch, and triage intact.
It felt straightforward after the branch was realigned with current main, though the stale PR history forced a merge step instead of a direct push.
confidence: high
surprises: the PR body needed the workflow marker before merge.
follow-ups: none.

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅ <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped, review gate skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate. The agent removed the standalone consult command, deleted the consult docs/tests, and kept heartbeat, engineer dispatch, advisor dispatch, and triage intact. It felt straightforward after the branch was realigned with current main, though the stale PR history forced a merge step instead of a direct push. confidence: high surprises: the PR body needed the workflow marker before merge. follow-ups: none. </details>

coilysiren referenced this issue

2026-07-14 15:27:09 +00:00

director should emit colorized, space buffered, visually distinct messages about the categories of actions its performing on startup #1283

Rows
Columns

Remove director consult mode from ward release scope #735

⚠️ Reopened: this run's work did not land on main

Reap diagnostics

Recover

⚠️ Reopened: this run's work did not land on `main`