code-fleet-watch: policy findings #1616

Closed
opened 2026-07-29 03:23:55 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 10 comments
Member

This issue is maintained automatically by code-fleet-watch.

Current product-policy findings:

  • !product:aos@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@cmd/ward/agent_release_transaction.go
  • !product:aos@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@docs/agent-release-transaction.md
  • !product:aos@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@scripts/release_contract_test.go
  • !product:repo-coilysiren@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@cmd/ward/git_clone.go
  • !product:repo-eco-ops@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@cmd/ward/atlas_catalog_graph.json
  • !product:repo-homebrew-tap@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@AGENTS.md
  • !product:repo-homebrew-tap@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@README.md
  • !product:repo-infrastructure@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@cmd/ward/git_clone.go
  • !product:repo-scoop-bucket@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@README.md

The scanner publishes aliases and paths only. It never writes decoded terms or matching content to Forgejo.

<!-- code-fleet-watch:product-policy --> This issue is maintained automatically by code-fleet-watch. Current product-policy findings: * <code>!product:aos@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@cmd/ward/agent_release_transaction.go</code> * <code>!product:aos@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@docs/agent-release-transaction.md</code> * <code>!product:aos@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@scripts/release_contract_test.go</code> * <code>!product:repo-coilysiren@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@cmd/ward/git_clone.go</code> * <code>!product:repo-eco-ops@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@cmd/ward/atlas_catalog_graph.json</code> * <code>!product:repo-homebrew-tap@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@AGENTS.md</code> * <code>!product:repo-homebrew-tap@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@README.md</code> * <code>!product:repo-infrastructure@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@cmd/ward/git_clone.go</code> * <code>!product:repo-scoop-bucket@coilyco-flight-deck/ward@README.md</code> The scanner publishes aliases and paths only. It never writes decoded terms or matching content to Forgejo.
Author
Member

code-fleet-watch detected a product-policy regression.

code-fleet-watch detected a product-policy regression.
Author
Member

code-fleet-watch refreshed the current product-policy inventory (40 finding(s)).

code-fleet-watch refreshed the current product-policy inventory (40 finding(s)).
Author
Member

Closing as absorbed by the headless product-boundary work in #1622. That issue owns removing AOS and AOSguard from Ward runtime code, shipped prompts, product documentation, tests, and examples. The scanner can reopen or refresh a finding if residue remains after #1622 lands.

Closing as absorbed by the headless product-boundary work in #1622. That issue owns removing AOS and AOSguard from Ward runtime code, shipped prompts, product documentation, tests, and examples. The scanner can reopen or refresh a finding if residue remains after #1622 lands.
Author
Member

Correction: reopened and restored to its prior triage state. The earlier closure was premature because Kai asked to review consult and interactive issues together before changing their disposition.

Correction: reopened and restored to its prior triage state. The earlier closure was premature because Kai asked to review consult and interactive issues together before changing their disposition.
Author
Member

Closing as duplicate automated inventory during the Ward v1 seal. Actionable product-boundary work is owned by #1622, #1495, #1528, #1623, and #1624. The scanner may publish fresh evidence if violations remain after those headless issues land.

Closing as duplicate automated inventory during the Ward v1 seal. Actionable product-boundary work is owned by #1622, #1495, #1528, #1623, and #1624. The scanner may publish fresh evidence if violations remain after those headless issues land.
Author
Member

code-fleet-watch detected a product-policy regression.

code-fleet-watch detected a product-policy regression.
Author
Member

Decision resolved by Kai on 2026-08-05.

This issue is a generated product-policy sentinel, not an implementation target.

  • Never dispatch an agent directly against #1616.
  • code-fleet-watch owns and refreshes the issue body.
  • While findings remain, keep the issue open at P4 with no workflow label.
  • Resolve findings through their owning issues, currently #1622, #1495, #1528, #1623, and #1624.
  • Close the sentinel only when its generated inventory reaches zero.
  • A later genuine regression may reopen or refresh it.

This decision clears the consult gate without treating derived scanner output as an independent work item.

Decision resolved by Kai on 2026-08-05. This issue is a generated product-policy sentinel, not an implementation target. * Never dispatch an agent directly against #1616. * code-fleet-watch owns and refreshes the issue body. * While findings remain, keep the issue open at P4 with no workflow label. * Resolve findings through their owning issues, currently #1622, #1495, #1528, #1623, and #1624. * Close the sentinel only when its generated inventory reaches zero. * A later genuine regression may reopen or refresh it. This decision clears the consult gate without treating derived scanner output as an independent work item.
Author
Member

code-fleet-watch detected a product-policy regression.

code-fleet-watch detected a product-policy regression.
Author
Member

code-fleet-watch refreshed the current product-policy inventory (9 finding(s)).

code-fleet-watch refreshed the current product-policy inventory (9 finding(s)).
Author
Member

code-fleet-watch is retired. See coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#830.

No sweep will refresh this issue again, so it is closed as unmaintained rather than resolved. The findings listed above were never reviewed and their disposition is unknown. Anyone who wants them addressed should open a fresh issue with the specific claim, since the alias-only format above is not readable without the retired denylist.

code-fleet-watch is retired. See coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#830. No sweep will refresh this issue again, so it is closed as unmaintained rather than resolved. The findings listed above were never reviewed and their disposition is unknown. Anyone who wants them addressed should open a fresh issue with the specific claim, since the alias-only format above is not readable without the retired denylist.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1616
No description provided.