Retrigger PR #1448 after runner context-canceled job stayed pending #1449

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-15 13:23:17 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 3 comments

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 13:23:17 +00:00

Member

PR #1448 for #1301 is mergeable, but its required check is wedged pending after the runner log ended in failure.

Evidence from the QA/ops director on 2026-07-15:

PR: #1448
Source issue: #1301, labels headless, P3
Head at inspection: fecdc61b3525f420f8dd59d8f8be760075fe4407
Forgejo reports mergeable=true.
Actions run 8585 / UI run #2295 still reports running after multiple polls.
The job log shows go test ./... succeeded, then golangci-lint run ./... began and the runner ended with:

[runner]: context canceled
Get "http://localhost:2375/v1.51/containers/.../archive?path=%2Fvar%2Frun%2Fact%2Fworkflow%2FSUMMARY.md": context canceled
Get "http://localhost:2375/v1.51/containers/.../archive?path=%2Fvar%2Frun%2Fact%2Fworkflow%2Fpathcmd.txt": context canceled
Job failed

Repair direction:

Re-trigger the PR check by pushing an empty commit or otherwise refreshing branch issue-1301.
If the rerun exposes a real lint/test failure, repair that failure in the same PR.
Leave #1448 mergeable with a terminal green required check, or clearly supersede it if a replacement PR is needed.

PR #1448 for #1301 is mergeable, but its required check is wedged pending after the runner log ended in failure. Evidence from the QA/ops director on 2026-07-15: - PR: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1448 - Source issue: #1301, labels `headless`, `P3` - Head at inspection: `fecdc61b3525f420f8dd59d8f8be760075fe4407` - Forgejo reports `mergeable=true`. - Actions run 8585 / UI run #2295 still reports `running` after multiple polls. - The job log shows `go test ./...` succeeded, then `golangci-lint run ./...` began and the runner ended with: ``` [runner]: context canceled Get "http://localhost:2375/v1.51/containers/.../archive?path=%2Fvar%2Frun%2Fact%2Fworkflow%2FSUMMARY.md": context canceled Get "http://localhost:2375/v1.51/containers/.../archive?path=%2Fvar%2Frun%2Fact%2Fworkflow%2Fpathcmd.txt": context canceled Job failed ``` Repair direction: - Re-trigger the PR check by pushing an empty commit or otherwise refreshing branch `issue-1301`. - If the rerun exposes a real lint/test failure, repair that failure in the same PR. - Leave #1448 mergeable with a terminal green required check, or clearly supersede it if a replacement PR is needed.

coilyco-ops added the

headless

labels

2026-07-15 13:23:17 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 13:23:41 +00:00

Author

Member

DISPATCH-DEFERRED: QA/ops tried to dispatch this repair immediately, but the Ward repo engineer pool is at capacity.

Evidence:

warded coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1449 --harness codex
ward: dispatch broker: ward agent engineer --harness codex: repo engineer limit is reached for coilyco-flight-deck/ward: 3 active engineer(s) (limit 3); pass --override-capacity to exceed real running capacity (dispatch log: /Users/kai/.ward/agent-logs/dispatch/20260715T132323Z-director-codex-jp85-coilyco-flight-deck-ward-1449.log)

This issue remains ready for sibling dispatch as soon as capacity opens.

DISPATCH-DEFERRED: QA/ops tried to dispatch this repair immediately, but the Ward repo engineer pool is at capacity. Evidence: ``` warded coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1449 --harness codex ward: dispatch broker: ward agent engineer --harness codex: repo engineer limit is reached for coilyco-flight-deck/ward: 3 active engineer(s) (limit 3); pass --override-capacity to exceed real running capacity (dispatch log: /Users/kai/.ward/agent-logs/dispatch/20260715T132323Z-director-codex-jp85-coilyco-flight-deck-ward-1449.log) ``` This issue remains ready for sibling dispatch as soon as capacity opens.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 13:33:02 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1449 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T13:33:01Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1449 · branch issue-1449 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1449 · ward v0.710.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T13:32:43Z
Comment thread: 1 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T13:23:41Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1449` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T13:33:01Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1449` · branch `issue-1449` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1449` · ward `v0.710.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T13:32:43Z` - **Comment thread:** 1 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T13:23:41Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-15 13:36:17 +00:00

Include director runs in issue log drains #1448

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-15 13:38:25 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 13:39:17 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1448

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped intentionally because the temporary ward default pending brokered QA.

retrospective: simple reroute. I refreshed the source branch, aligned the PR body to close #1449, and the rerun cleared cleanly.
confidence: high
surprises: none after the empty commit retriggered the run.
follow-ups: none.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1448 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped intentionally because the temporary ward default pending brokered QA. retrospective: simple reroute. I refreshed the source branch, aligned the PR body to close #1449, and the rerun cleared cleanly. confidence: high surprises: none after the empty commit retriggered the run. follow-ups: none. </details>