Repair failed release run after PR #1373 #1376

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-15 09:51:01 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 1 comment

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 09:51:01 +00:00

Member

Problem

Post-merge release run 8431 failed after PR #1373 merged for issue #1370. ward agent pr runs coilyco-flight-deck/ward reports:

run 8431 (#2182) failure  release.yml push release "Finish one-file smart-default tunable source after #1365 (#1373)"

PR #1373 is already merged and issue #1370 is closed, so this needs its own recovery trail instead of disappearing into the closed issue.

Acceptance

Inspect the failed release run for PR #1373 / issue #1370.
If the failure is transient, retrigger the supported release path.
If the failure is real, repair it with a focused change.
Leave final evidence showing the release path green or the exact remaining blocker.

Related: #1175, #1365, #1370, #1373, run 8431.

## Problem Post-merge release run 8431 failed after PR #1373 merged for issue #1370. `ward agent pr runs coilyco-flight-deck/ward` reports: ```text run 8431 (#2182) failure release.yml push release "Finish one-file smart-default tunable source after #1365 (#1373)" ``` PR #1373 is already merged and issue #1370 is closed, so this needs its own recovery trail instead of disappearing into the closed issue. ## Acceptance - Inspect the failed release run for PR #1373 / issue #1370. - If the failure is transient, retrigger the supported release path. - If the failure is real, repair it with a focused change. - Leave final evidence showing the release path green or the exact remaining blocker. Related: #1175, #1365, #1370, #1373, run 8431.

coilyco-ops added this to the warded control plane coherence milestone

2026-07-15 09:51:01 +00:00

coilyco-ops added the

headless

labels

2026-07-15 09:51:01 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 09:51:28 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1376 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T09:51:28Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1376 · branch issue-1376 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1376 · ward v0.710.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T09:51:21Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1376` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T09:51:28Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1376` · branch `issue-1376` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1376` · ward `v0.710.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T09:51:21Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-15 09:53:30 +00:00