Retrigger empty-diff PR 1325 after Forgejo lint failure #1352

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-15 08:10:11 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 3 comments

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 08:10:11 +00:00

Member

PR #1325 is mergeable and currently has zero changed files against main, but the required test / test (pull_request) check is red from run 8342 / Forgejo run index 2130.

Evidence:

ward agent pr status coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1325 reports combined status failure only for test / test (pull_request).
ward agent pr recover coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1325 reports the next safe action is to merge once required checks are green.
PR metadata now reports changed_files: 0, additions: 0, deletions: 0, head 9943dcd8876fa0ffea99eb4ec14fa123e78b2600, base b5d361b50bb662344594f54db2c6935d03cb18ea.
Forgejo run 8342 says go vet and go test succeeded; golangci-lint failed.
Local scratch reproduction on the exact PR head: golangci-lint run ./... passed with 0 issues.
ward agent pr rerun coilyco-flight-deck/ward 8342 cannot rerun it because this Forgejo exposes no Actions rerun API; Ward reports the only retrigger path is pushing to the branch, such as an empty commit.

Please retrigger PR 1325 without changing functional code if possible, then leave the PR green for merge. If the retry exposes a real lint failure, repair that failure instead.

Related: #1321 and PR #1325.

PR https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1325 is mergeable and currently has zero changed files against main, but the required `test / test (pull_request)` check is red from run 8342 / Forgejo run index 2130. Evidence: - `ward agent pr status coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1325` reports combined status `failure` only for `test / test (pull_request)`. - `ward agent pr recover coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1325` reports the next safe action is to merge once required checks are green. - PR metadata now reports `changed_files: 0`, `additions: 0`, `deletions: 0`, head `9943dcd8876fa0ffea99eb4ec14fa123e78b2600`, base `b5d361b50bb662344594f54db2c6935d03cb18ea`. - Forgejo run 8342 says `go vet` and `go test` succeeded; `golangci-lint` failed. - Local scratch reproduction on the exact PR head: `golangci-lint run ./...` passed with `0 issues`. - `ward agent pr rerun coilyco-flight-deck/ward 8342` cannot rerun it because this Forgejo exposes no Actions rerun API; Ward reports the only retrigger path is pushing to the branch, such as an empty commit. Please retrigger PR 1325 without changing functional code if possible, then leave the PR green for merge. If the retry exposes a real lint failure, repair that failure instead. Related: #1321 and PR #1325.

coilyco-ops added this to the warded control plane coherence milestone

2026-07-15 08:10:11 +00:00

coilyco-ops added the

headless

labels

2026-07-15 08:10:11 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 08:10:43 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1352 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T08:10:43Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1352 · branch issue-1352 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1352 · ward v0.710.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T08:10:27Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1352` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T08:10:43Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1352` · branch `issue-1352` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1352` · ward `v0.710.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T08:10:27Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue

2026-07-15 08:11:49 +00:00

Complete the stale-human-feedback gate contract after PR #1337 #1346

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 08:16:43 +00:00

Author

Member

QA/ops verification: the requested retrigger landed on PR #1325 as head 53f67b0274. Required check run 8359 is green. PR #1325 was then closed as an empty-diff PR because current main already contains the defaults-drift fix. Closing this operational repair as complete.

QA/ops verification: the requested retrigger landed on PR #1325 as head 53f67b02749ce5f8de01d22315d12b0ecac421f8. Required check run 8359 is green. PR #1325 was then closed as an empty-diff PR because current main already contains the defaults-drift fix. Closing this operational repair as complete.

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-15 08:16:48 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 08:16:58 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1325

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped: the in-container review gate was intentionally skipped because the temporary ward default pending brokered QA

felt: pure retrigger, no code path changed.
confidence: high.
surprises: the original PR was already empty-diff; an empty push was enough to retrigger Forgejo.
follow-ups: director merge sweep can land PR 1325 once it is ready.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1325 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped: the in-container review gate was intentionally skipped because the temporary ward default pending brokered QA felt: pure retrigger, no code path changed. confidence: high. surprises: the original PR was already empty-diff; an empty push was enough to retrigger Forgejo. follow-ups: director merge sweep can land PR 1325 once it is ready. </details>