coilyco-flight-deck/ward

Fork 0

Fix smart-defaults generated asset drift after defaults source change #1321

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-15 05:23:57 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 5 comments

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 05:23:57 +00:00

Member

ward PR 1319 for the release-flow contract is blocked by existing smart-defaults drift after ward#1318 landed.

Evidence from ward#1315 / PR 1319:

PR 1319 head: 5dbe6fc98bf1abcf077baa64840c8ef55a8cf8eb
PR check: test / test (pull_request) failed.
The engineer reported ward exec test fails locally on:
- TestDefaultsAssetMatchesCanonicalSource
- TestBakedSmartDefaultsMatchesCanonicalSource
The failure appears unrelated to the release-workflow edits, but it blocks the release-flow fix from merging.
The earlier source-of-truth issue ward#1312 is closed, and no open dedicated defaults drift issue was found.

Please repair the generated/defaults asset drift so ward exec test and the PR check pass, then leave final PR/check evidence. This is blocking ward#1315 / PR 1319.

ward PR 1319 for the release-flow contract is blocked by existing smart-defaults drift after `ward#1318` landed. Evidence from `ward#1315` / PR 1319: * PR 1319 head: `5dbe6fc98bf1abcf077baa64840c8ef55a8cf8eb` * PR check: `test / test (pull_request)` failed. * The engineer reported `ward exec test` fails locally on: * `TestDefaultsAssetMatchesCanonicalSource` * `TestBakedSmartDefaultsMatchesCanonicalSource` * The failure appears unrelated to the release-workflow edits, but it blocks the release-flow fix from merging. * The earlier source-of-truth issue `ward#1312` is closed, and no open dedicated defaults drift issue was found. Please repair the generated/defaults asset drift so `ward exec test` and the PR check pass, then leave final PR/check evidence. This is blocking `ward#1315` / PR 1319.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 05:28:49 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1321 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T05:28:48Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1321 · branch issue-1321 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1321 · ward v0.697.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T05:28:36Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.697.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1321` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T05:28:48Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1321` · branch `issue-1321` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1321` · ward `v0.697.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T05:28:36Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.697.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

~~coilyco-ops referenced this issue 2026-07-15 05:34:20 +00:00~~

Fix smart-defaults generated asset drift after defaults source change #1325

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 05:39:20 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1325

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped: the in-container review gate was intentionally skipped because the temporary ward default pending brokered QA

The canonical smart-defaults source is back in sync with the baked defaults asset, so the embedded fallback parses cleanly and the drift checks stay green.

Confidence: high.
Surprises: the baked parser fails closed without the repo-authority block, so the source file had to carry that block too.
Follow-up: director merge sweep can land PR 1325 once policy and queue allow.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1325 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped: the in-container review gate was intentionally skipped because the temporary ward default pending brokered QA The canonical smart-defaults source is back in sync with the baked defaults asset, so the embedded fallback parses cleanly and the drift checks stay green. Confidence: high. Surprises: the baked parser fails closed without the repo-authority block, so the source file had to carry that block too. Follow-up: director merge sweep can land PR 1325 once policy and queue allow. </details>

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-15 05:55:50 +00:00

Fix smart-defaults generated asset drift after defaults source change #1325

coilyco-ops referenced this issue

2026-07-15 08:10:11 +00:00

Retrigger empty-diff PR 1325 after Forgejo lint failure #1352

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 08:10:29 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1321 on host 74a70515a491.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T08:10:28Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1321 · branch issue-1321 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1321 · ward v0.710.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T08:10:23Z
Comment thread: 1 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T05:39:20Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T05:28:49Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1321` on host `74a70515a491`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T08:10:28Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1321` · branch `issue-1321` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1321` · ward `v0.710.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T08:10:23Z` - **Comment thread:** 1 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T05:39:20Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T05:28:49Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 08:10:36 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: dispatch-deferred

reservation-collision details

This forwarded dispatch collided with a reservation another run still holds.

Attempted harness: codex
Attempted run: ward agent engineer coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1321 --harness codex --branch issue-1321 --ward-version v0.710.0 --workflow pull-request-and-merge
Host log: /Users/kai/.ward/agent-logs/dispatch/20260715T081010Z-director-codex-md65-coilyco-flight-deck-ward-1321.log
Collision: ward agent engineer --harness codex: issue coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1321 is already reserved remotely (by @coilyco-ops at 2026-07-15T08:10:29Z); wait for it to finish or pass --override-reservation to override

Nothing new is running for this dispatch, and the live run's hold is untouched. Retry: a ward agent director heartbeat sweeps this marker and redispatches once the hold releases - the run's terminal WARDED_WORKFLOW outcome supersedes its reservation (ward#1149). A manual retry can pass --override-reservation if the collision is genuinely stale.

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: dispatch-deferred <details><summary>reservation-collision details</summary> This forwarded dispatch collided with a reservation another run still holds. Attempted harness: `codex` Attempted run: `ward agent engineer coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1321 --harness codex --branch issue-1321 --ward-version v0.710.0 --workflow pull-request-and-merge` Host log: `/Users/kai/.ward/agent-logs/dispatch/20260715T081010Z-director-codex-md65-coilyco-flight-deck-ward-1321.log` Collision: `ward agent engineer --harness codex: issue coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1321 is already reserved remotely (by @coilyco-ops at 2026-07-15T08:10:29Z); wait for it to finish or pass --override-reservation to override` Nothing new is running for this dispatch, and the live run's hold is untouched. Retry: a `ward agent director` heartbeat sweeps this marker and redispatches once the hold releases - the run's terminal `WARDED_WORKFLOW` outcome supersedes its reservation (ward#1149). A manual retry can pass `--override-reservation` if the collision is genuinely stale. </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 08:16:43 +00:00

Author

Member

QA/ops verification: current main already contains the defaults-drift fix. PR #1325 is now an empty-diff PR against main, the retriggered required check run 8359 is green, and focused verification on origin/main passed: go test ./cmd/ward -run 'TestDefaultsAssetMatchesCanonicalSource|TestBakedSmartDefaultsMatchesCanonicalSource' -count=1. Closing as satisfied.

QA/ops verification: current main already contains the defaults-drift fix. PR #1325 is now an empty-diff PR against main, the retriggered required check run 8359 is green, and focused verification on origin/main passed: `go test ./cmd/ward -run 'TestDefaultsAssetMatchesCanonicalSource|TestBakedSmartDefaultsMatchesCanonicalSource' -count=1`. Closing as satisfied.

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-15 08:16:48 +00:00