coilyco-flight-deck/ward

Archived

Watch

PR-pressure redispatch should accept PR refs without hidden branch flags #1299

Merged

coilyco-ops merged 2 commits from issue-1166 into main

2026-07-15 05:26:08 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 01:33:49 +00:00

Owner

Accept PR refs as continuation input for open-PR backpressure, and show --branch in the engineer help surface again.

This keeps the brokered engineer lane aligned with the documented owner/repo!N form, so director surfaces can continue existing PR work without discovering a hidden branch-only escape hatch.

owner/repo!N now counts as existing PR work for the open-PR backpressure gate.
--branch is visible in ward agent engineer --help again, with continuation semantics spelled out.
Validation: pre-commit lint passed on commit. Full Go test execution was blocked by container filesystem pressure in this run.

closes #1299
ward.workflow: pull-request-and-merge

Accept PR refs as continuation input for open-PR backpressure, and show `--branch` in the engineer help surface again. This keeps the brokered engineer lane aligned with the documented `owner/repo!N` form, so director surfaces can continue existing PR work without discovering a hidden branch-only escape hatch. - `owner/repo!N` now counts as existing PR work for the open-PR backpressure gate. - `--branch` is visible in `ward agent engineer --help` again, with continuation semantics spelled out. - Validation: pre-commit lint passed on commit. Full Go test execution was blocked by container filesystem pressure in this run. closes #1299 ward.workflow: pull-request-and-merge

coilyco-ops added 1 commit

2026-07-15 01:33:49 +00:00

fix PR ref backpressure continuation

test / test (pull_request) Failing after 34s

Details

3d82c0da13

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 05:15:35 +00:00

Author

Owner

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1299 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T05:15:34Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1299 · branch issue-1299 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1299 · ward v0.697.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T05:15:17Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.697.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1299` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T05:15:34Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1299` · branch `issue-1299` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1299` · ward `v0.697.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T05:15:17Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.697.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops added 1 commit

2026-07-15 05:19:59 +00:00

docs: regenerate agent flags

test / test (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s

Details

c51e116b12

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 05:21:51 +00:00

Author

Owner

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1299

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA

Review gate intentionally skipped because the temporary ward default is pending brokered QA. The branch was already doing the right thing; the CI failure was just generated-doc drift.

confidence: high
surprise: only a trailing newline in docs/agent-flags.md
follow-up: director merge sweep can land the green PR

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1299 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA Review gate intentionally skipped because the temporary ward default is pending brokered QA. The branch was already doing the right thing; the CI failure was just generated-doc drift. confidence: high surprise: only a trailing newline in `docs/agent-flags.md` follow-up: director merge sweep can land the green PR </details>

coilyco-ops merged commit 2eab397e3c into main

2026-07-15 05:26:08 +00:00

coilyco-ops referenced this pull request from a commit

2026-07-15 05:26:09 +00:00

PR-pressure redispatch should accept PR refs without hidden branch flags (#1299)

coilyco-ops referenced this pull request

2026-07-15 05:30:30 +00:00

Fix ward promote failure after PR-pressure merge #1323

coilyco-ops referenced this pull request

2026-07-15 05:52:02 +00:00

docs: note transient promote failures #1329

Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.