Add scoop install to readme #1111

Closed
opened 2026-07-11 15:05:21 +00:00 by coilysiren · 3 comments
Owner

The problem

And Linux I guess

Proposed change

//

Alternatives considered

No response

Before filing

  • I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
  • This stays within ward's scope (the dev-verb gate / agent driver), not a personal-infra or downstream-repo verb.
### The problem And Linux I guess ### Proposed change // ### Alternatives considered _No response_ ### Before filing - [x] I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] This stays within ward's scope (the dev-verb gate / agent driver), not a personal-infra or downstream-repo verb.
Author
Owner

Also just, make the section less noisy, and show the child from source variant

Also just, make the section less noisy, and show the child from source variant
Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1111 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-14T06:35:53Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1111 · branch issue-1111 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-ward-1111 · ward v0.667.0 · dispatched 2026-07-14T06:35:46Z
  • Comment thread: 1 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.667.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1111` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-14T06:35:53Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1111` · branch `issue-1111` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1111` · ward `v0.667.0` · dispatched `2026-07-14T06:35:46Z` - **Comment thread:** 1 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilysiren (2026-07-11T15:06:45Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.667.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1228

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default
felt: narrow and straightforward
confidence: high
surprise: none
follow-ups: none

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1228 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default felt: narrow and straightforward confidence: high surprise: none follow-ups: none </details>
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1111
No description provided.