Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-09T15:48:09Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/scoop-bucket#3 · branch issue-3 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-scoop-bucket-3 · ward v0.493.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T15:48:09Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-scoop-bucket-3` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-09T15:48:09Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/scoop-bucket#3` · branch `issue-3` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-scoop-bucket-3` · ward `v0.493.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T15:48:09Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops added 1 commit

2026-07-09 15:51:11 +00:00

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into issue-2 da8616f164

coilyco-ops merged commit f6572500e3 into main

2026-07-09 15:52:40 +00:00

coilyco-ops referenced this pull request from a commit

2026-07-09 15:52:41 +00:00

Merge pull request 'Run autoupdate workflow in aos dev-base' (#3) from issue-2 into main

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 15:53:04 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped because in-container review gate was skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate

Merged PR #3 after rebasing it onto current main, updated the PR body to 'closes #3' plus 'ward.workflow: pull-request-and-merge', and closed PR #4 as duplicate residue.

felt: straightforward once the branch provenance was untangled.
confidence: high
surprises: PR 3 and PR 4 pointed at the same stale salvage commit, and the branch needed a merge with current main before merge would land cleanly.
follow-ups: none.

WARD-OUTCOME: done ✅ <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped because in-container review gate was skipped by --skip-review / --no-review-gate Merged PR #3 after rebasing it onto current main, updated the PR body to 'closes #3' plus 'ward.workflow: pull-request-and-merge', and closed PR #4 as duplicate residue. felt: straightforward once the branch provenance was untangled. confidence: high surprises: PR 3 and PR 4 pointed at the same stale salvage commit, and the branch needed a merge with current main before merge would land cleanly. follow-ups: none. </details>