Run build-publish workflow in aos dev-base #1

Closed
opened 2026-07-09 03:52:00 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 5 comments
Member

The dev-base scan found .forgejo/workflows/build-publish.yml using astral-sh/setup-uv and downloading Docker CLI from download.docker.com. The pinned aos dev-base image already ships uv/Python and Docker CLI.

Acceptance criteria:

  • Run test and publish jobs in the pinned aos dev-base image.
  • Remove astral-sh/setup-uv and Docker CLI tarball install.
  • Keep Docker host probing and plain-http in-cluster registry push behavior unchanged.
The dev-base scan found `.forgejo/workflows/build-publish.yml` using `astral-sh/setup-uv` and downloading Docker CLI from `download.docker.com`. The pinned aos dev-base image already ships uv/Python and Docker CLI. Acceptance criteria: * Run test and publish jobs in the pinned aos dev-base image. * Remove `astral-sh/setup-uv` and Docker CLI tarball install. * Keep Docker host probing and plain-http in-cluster registry push behavior unchanged.
Author
Member

🔒 Reserved by ward agent --harness codex — container engineer-codex-node-stats-mcp-1 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T03:54:58Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/node-stats-mcp#1 · branch issue-1 · harness codex · workflow pr
  • Run: engineer-codex-node-stats-mcp-1 · ward v0.470.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T03:54:58Z
  • Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.470.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> 🔒 Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` — container `engineer-codex-node-stats-mcp-1` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local` is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T03:54:58Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh** — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/node-stats-mcp#1` · branch `issue-1` · harness `codex` · workflow `pr` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-node-stats-mcp-1` · ward `v0.470.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T03:54:58Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.470.0). </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
Author
Member

WARD-OUTCOME: done - build-publish now runs in pinned aos dev-base
Review gate skipped because --skip-preflight / --no-preflight also skips review.
This was a straightforward workflow trim once the dev-base tag was located. The only friction was the local container not matching dev-base, so validation needed writable UV paths before it could run. Confidence is high, and I do not see any follow-up beyond the landed PR.

WARD-OUTCOME: done - build-publish now runs in pinned aos dev-base Review gate skipped because --skip-preflight / --no-preflight also skips review. This was a straightforward workflow trim once the dev-base tag was located. The only friction was the local container not matching dev-base, so validation needed writable UV paths before it could run. Confidence is high, and I do not see any follow-up beyond the landed PR.
Author
Member

⚠️ Reopened: this run's work did not land on main

An ephemeral ward container (codex mode) dispatched for this issue finished but its work was not merged to main, so the reaper preserved it on a branch before teardown and reopened the issue (a closing reference for #1 never reached main). Recover from the salvage branch below.

  • Repo: coilyco-flight-deck/node-stats-mcp
  • Salvage branch: ward-salvage/node-stats-mcp-c3f6a84a
  • Pull request: not opened - PR creation failed: forgejo: parse created pull request: unexpected end of JSON input
  • Reason: run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only)
  • Container uptime at reap: 4m (age of the baked Forgejo PAT snapshot; a long-lived container is likelier to carry a rotated token)

Reap diagnostics

--- reap diagnostics ---
ward version:      v0.470.0
version source:    pinned via WARD_VERSION/--ward-version (v0.470.0)
HEAD:              30c3b8f3bc2b
origin/main:       593b1a1b1973
ancestry:          HEAD is NOT yet on origin/main - residual work remains to land
decision gate:     workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only)
reason:            run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only)
provenance:        not read (workflow hold)
run-owned landed:  no
working tree:      clean
container uptime:  4m (baked Forgejo PAT age proxy)
--- end reap diagnostics ---

Recover

git fetch https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/node-stats-mcp.git ward-salvage/node-stats-mcp-c3f6a84a
git checkout -b ward-salvage/node-stats-mcp-c3f6a84a FETCH_HEAD

— Codex, via ward agent

## ⚠️ Reopened: this run's work did not land on `main` An ephemeral `ward container` (codex mode) dispatched for this issue finished but its work was **not merged to `main`**, so the reaper preserved it on a branch before teardown and reopened the issue (a closing reference for #1 never reached `main`). Recover from the salvage branch below. - **Repo:** `coilyco-flight-deck/node-stats-mcp` - **Salvage branch:** `ward-salvage/node-stats-mcp-c3f6a84a` - **Pull request:** not opened - PR creation failed: forgejo: parse created pull request: unexpected end of JSON input - **Reason:** run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only) - **Container uptime at reap:** 4m (age of the baked Forgejo PAT snapshot; a long-lived container is likelier to carry a rotated token) ## Reap diagnostics ``` --- reap diagnostics --- ward version: v0.470.0 version source: pinned via WARD_VERSION/--ward-version (v0.470.0) HEAD: 30c3b8f3bc2b origin/main: 593b1a1b1973 ancestry: HEAD is NOT yet on origin/main - residual work remains to land decision gate: workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only) reason: run workflow does not land on main (--workflow pr/patch-only) provenance: not read (workflow hold) run-owned landed: no working tree: clean container uptime: 4m (baked Forgejo PAT age proxy) --- end reap diagnostics --- ``` ## Recover ```bash git fetch https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/node-stats-mcp.git ward-salvage/node-stats-mcp-c3f6a84a git checkout -b ward-salvage/node-stats-mcp-c3f6a84a FETCH_HEAD ``` <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
Author
Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-claude-node-stats-mcp-1 on host KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER.

Reserved by ward agent --harness claude (reserved 2026-07-10T21:53:30Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/node-stats-mcp#1 · branch issue-1 · harness claude · workflow direct-main
  • Run: engineer-claude-node-stats-mcp-1 · ward v0.605.0 · dispatched 2026-07-10T21:53:30Z
  • Comment thread: 2 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.605.0).

— Claude (she/her), via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-claude-node-stats-mcp-1` on host `KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness claude` (reserved 2026-07-10T21:53:30Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/node-stats-mcp#1` · branch `issue-1` · harness `claude` · workflow `direct-main` - **Run:** `engineer-claude-node-stats-mcp-1` · ward `v0.605.0` · dispatched `2026-07-10T21:53:30Z` - **Comment thread:** 2 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T03:59:33Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T03:59:48Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T03:55:00Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.605.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Claude (she/her), via `ward agent`
Author
Member

WARD-OUTCOME: done

details
  • workflow: direct-to-main; review summary: skipped - the in-container review gate was intentionally skipped because of the temporary ward default pending brokered QA.
  • State on arrival - the dev-base migration had already landed on main before this run: PR #2 merged the salvaged commit 30c3b8f, so both build-publish jobs run in the pinned aos dev-base image (agentic-os:v0.195.0), astral-sh/setup-uv and the Docker CLI tarball install are gone, and the docker-host probe plus plain-http in-cluster registry push are unchanged. The reaper reopened this issue only because the closing reference never reached main.
  • What this run did - verified all three acceptance criteria on origin/main (no setup-uv or download.docker.com references anywhere in the tree), ran ward test (8 passed) and ward lint (clean) on main, then landed commit a41c623 on main carrying the closes #1 trailer.
  • Retrospective - this felt like archaeology rather than implementation: the whole job was confirming the salvage had already merged and closing the loop. Confidence is high. One surprise: main carries three identical chore(ci) Telegram-alert commits, harmless but odd. No follow-ups.
WARD-OUTCOME: done <details><summary>details</summary> * workflow: direct-to-main; review summary: skipped - the in-container review gate was intentionally skipped because of the temporary ward default pending brokered QA. * State on arrival - the dev-base migration had already landed on main before this run: PR #2 merged the salvaged commit 30c3b8f, so both build-publish jobs run in the pinned aos dev-base image (agentic-os:v0.195.0), astral-sh/setup-uv and the Docker CLI tarball install are gone, and the docker-host probe plus plain-http in-cluster registry push are unchanged. The reaper reopened this issue only because the closing reference never reached main. * What this run did - verified all three acceptance criteria on origin/main (no setup-uv or download.docker.com references anywhere in the tree), ran ward test (8 passed) and ward lint (clean) on main, then landed commit a41c623 on main carrying the closes #1 trailer. * Retrospective - this felt like archaeology rather than implementation: the whole job was confirming the salvage had already merged and closing the loop. Confidence is high. One surprise: main carries three identical chore(ci) Telegram-alert commits, harmless but odd. No follow-ups. </details>
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.