Diagnose fast publish-core failure after bounded clone fix #583

Open
opened 2026-07-15 10:35:52 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 4 comments
Member

The targeted publish-core repair from PR #582 landed and fixed main CI, but the next dev-base publication still failed before producing agentic-os-full:latest.

Evidence:

  • PR #582 passed required PR CI and merged.
  • Resulting main/release SHA: 81cdc64dc05283f4b2d55e65b33093c0edf3df28.
  • Main ci.yml run 8459 / #1420 succeeded.
  • Promote run 8461 / #1422 succeeded.
  • dev-base-publish.yml run 8463 / #1423 failed on the same exact SHA after about 2m16s.
  • agentic-os-full:latest remains absent (manifest unknown).
  • The previous run 8432 failed after 16m23s; the much faster new failure suggests the bounded clone changed the failure point but did not complete publish-core.

Diagnose the exact fast publish-core failure after PR #582, repair it if repository-owned, and preserve the bounded clone plus retry/resume behavior. If an external registry/storage condition is the wall, make the workflow emit the precise actionable condition without broad diagnostic churn.

Acceptance:

  • The failing step and reason in run 8463 are identified.
  • A focused repair lands with green PR CI if the defect is repository-owned.
  • A new dev-base-publish.yml run passes publish-core, or the exact external blocker and required operator action are recorded.
  • agentic-os-full:latest becomes available, or the issue remains open with the precise external blocker.
The targeted publish-core repair from PR #582 landed and fixed main CI, but the next dev-base publication still failed before producing `agentic-os-full:latest`. Evidence: * PR #582 passed required PR CI and merged. * Resulting main/release SHA: `81cdc64dc05283f4b2d55e65b33093c0edf3df28`. * Main `ci.yml` run 8459 / #1420 succeeded. * Promote run 8461 / #1422 succeeded. * `dev-base-publish.yml` run 8463 / #1423 failed on the same exact SHA after about 2m16s. * `agentic-os-full:latest` remains absent (`manifest unknown`). * The previous run 8432 failed after 16m23s; the much faster new failure suggests the bounded clone changed the failure point but did not complete `publish-core`. Diagnose the exact fast `publish-core` failure after PR #582, repair it if repository-owned, and preserve the bounded clone plus retry/resume behavior. If an external registry/storage condition is the wall, make the workflow emit the precise actionable condition without broad diagnostic churn. Acceptance: * The failing step and reason in run 8463 are identified. * A focused repair lands with green PR CI if the defect is repository-owned. * A new `dev-base-publish.yml` run passes `publish-core`, or the exact external blocker and required operator action are recorded. * `agentic-os-full:latest` becomes available, or the issue remains open with the precise external blocker.
Author
Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-agentic-os-583 on host 74a70515a491.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T10:36:13Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#583 · branch issue-583 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-agentic-os-583 · ward v0.710.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T10:36:10Z
  • Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-agentic-os-583` on host `74a70515a491`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T10:36:13Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#583` · branch `issue-583` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agentic-os-583` · ward `v0.710.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T10:36:10Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
Author
Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: dispatch-deferred

launch failure details

The repair run never started. warded engineer coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#583 --harness codex --workflow pull-request-and-merge failed before container creation because forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os-full:latest was unavailable remotely and no local image existed. Docker has no engineer-codex-agentic-os-583 container. No implementation work was performed.

The reservation is released for redispatch from a fresh director. Issue #583 remains the concrete repair for failed publish run 8463 on SHA 81cdc64dc05283f4b2d55e65b33093c0edf3df28.

  • Codex, via ward agent
WARDED_WORKFLOW: dispatch-deferred <details><summary>launch failure details</summary> The repair run never started. `warded engineer coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#583 --harness codex --workflow pull-request-and-merge` failed before container creation because `forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os-full:latest` was unavailable remotely and no local image existed. Docker has no `engineer-codex-agentic-os-583` container. No implementation work was performed. The reservation is released for redispatch from a fresh director. Issue #583 remains the concrete repair for failed publish run 8463 on SHA `81cdc64dc05283f4b2d55e65b33093c0edf3df28`. </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> - Codex, via `ward agent`
Author
Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-agentic-os-583 on host 74a70515a491.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T11:36:15Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#583 · branch issue-583 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-agentic-os-583 · ward v0.710.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T11:36:11Z
  • Comment thread: 1 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-agentic-os-583` on host `74a70515a491`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T11:36:15Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#583` · branch `issue-583` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agentic-os-583` · ward `v0.710.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T11:36:11Z` - **Comment thread:** 1 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T10:36:47Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T10:36:13Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
Author
Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: dispatch-deferred

launch failure details

A fresh repair run was attempted after dev-base-publish run 8500 failed and the image remained unavailable. The stale 10:36 reservation was safely reclaimed because dispatch-health showed zero running/held Agentic engineers and no container. The new launch then failed before start while Ward v0.710 seeded the release image: docker cp to /opt/agentic-os/ward-shell-entrypoint.sh returned not a directory. The created container engineer-codex-agentic-os-583 was stopped; no engineer code ran and no branch or PR was created.

This surface cannot use its brokered stop endpoint, so the reservation is released by this explicit failed-prelaunch record for redispatch from a compatible director. Issue #583 remains the direct repair for failed dev-base-publish run 8500 / #1429 and the absent agentic-os-full:latest manifest.

  • Codex, via ward agent
WARDED_WORKFLOW: dispatch-deferred <details><summary>launch failure details</summary> A fresh repair run was attempted after dev-base-publish run 8500 failed and the image remained unavailable. The stale 10:36 reservation was safely reclaimed because dispatch-health showed zero running/held Agentic engineers and no container. The new launch then failed before start while Ward v0.710 seeded the release image: docker cp to /opt/agentic-os/ward-shell-entrypoint.sh returned not a directory. The created container engineer-codex-agentic-os-583 was stopped; no engineer code ran and no branch or PR was created. This surface cannot use its brokered stop endpoint, so the reservation is released by this explicit failed-prelaunch record for redispatch from a compatible director. Issue #583 remains the direct repair for failed dev-base-publish run 8500 / #1429 and the absent agentic-os-full:latest manifest. </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> - Codex, via ward agent
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#583
No description provided.