Implement Forgejo Actions bridges with specverb fetch #530

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-14 11:14:25 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 2 comments

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 11:14:25 +00:00

Member

Problem

agentic-os#473 is already in flight, but Kai added a new direction after that engineer launched: implement the Forgejo Actions log/rerun bridge with specverb fetch. The running engineer will not see that comment because warded runs do not reread issue threads after launch.

Do

Use the specverb fetch pattern from cli-guard docs/specverb-fetch.md for the Forgejo Actions bridge work.
Apply it to the dead log/rerun bridge surface described in agentic-os#473.
Preserve the public-safe guardfile boundary and avoid embedding secrets or host-specific opaque values.
Coordinate with or supersede PR #529 only if needed, but do not merge red CI.

Acceptance

The bridge implementation follows the specverb fetch direction instead of ad hoc raw web/API calls.
The PR has green CI before merge.
The issue thread or PR clearly says how this relates to agentic-os#473 and PR #529.

Context: agentic-os#473 comment from 2026-07-14T11:08:51Z says: Implement this with specverb fetch: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard/src/branch/main/docs/specverb-fetch.md

## Problem agentic-os#473 is already in flight, but Kai added a new direction after that engineer launched: implement the Forgejo Actions log/rerun bridge with specverb fetch. The running engineer will not see that comment because warded runs do not reread issue threads after launch. ## Do * Use the specverb fetch pattern from cli-guard docs/specverb-fetch.md for the Forgejo Actions bridge work. * Apply it to the dead log/rerun bridge surface described in agentic-os#473. * Preserve the public-safe guardfile boundary and avoid embedding secrets or host-specific opaque values. * Coordinate with or supersede PR #529 only if needed, but do not merge red CI. ## Acceptance * The bridge implementation follows the specverb fetch direction instead of ad hoc raw web/API calls. * The PR has green CI before merge. * The issue thread or PR clearly says how this relates to agentic-os#473 and PR #529. Context: agentic-os#473 comment from 2026-07-14T11:08:51Z says: Implement this with specverb fetch: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard/src/branch/main/docs/specverb-fetch.md

coilyco-ops added the

headless

labels

2026-07-14 11:14:25 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 11:26:40 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-agentic-os-530 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-14T11:26:40Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#530 · branch issue-530 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-agentic-os-530 · ward v0.679.0 · dispatched 2026-07-14T11:26:33Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.679.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-agentic-os-530` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-14T11:26:40Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#530` · branch `issue-530` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agentic-os-530` · ward `v0.679.0` · dispatched `2026-07-14T11:26:33Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.679.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-14 11:43:52 +00:00

feat(forgejo): add specverb fetch mirrors #531

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 11:48:26 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #531

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default
felt: steady, mostly guardfile and docs wiring
confidence: high
surprises: the committed ward reference needed a manual fetch stanza insert because the local generator lagged the new fetch render
follow-ups: none

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os/pulls/531 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default felt: steady, mostly guardfile and docs wiring confidence: high surprises: the committed ward reference needed a manual fetch stanza insert because the local generator lagged the new fetch render follow-ups: none </details>

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-14 11:50:49 +00:00