coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 34 Pull requests 2 Projects Releases 230 Packages 1 Activity Actions 1

Run the dev-base docker build + main-only validations on PRs as a build-only validation step (prevent the aos#452 main-red class) #454

New issue
Open
opened 2026-07-10 18:55:02 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 18 comments
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-10 18:55:02 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Run the dev-base docker build + main-only validations on PRs (build-only, no publish)

Today the dev-base docker build lives in release.yml, which triggers on push: [main] only. ci.yml runs on pull_request but only the test gate - it never builds the image. So a PR cannot fail on anything the docker build catches: a broken Dockerfile, a stale ARG WARD_VERSION, a swagger-lock vs ward doctor desync, or a dep-bump pin drift. All of those only surface after merge, red on main - which is exactly the aos#452 incident (publish-dev-base failing on main, so landed pin bumps never reach :latest).

The fix is to shift that validation left: build and verify the dev-base image on every PR as a required check, without publishing. Publish/tag/mirror stay main-only (you never publish from a PR), but the build + in-image gate runs pre-merge so main-breakage is caught on the PR that causes it.

Do

  • Add a pull_request-triggered job (in ci.yml, or a reusable job release.yml also calls) that runs the build + verify half of publish-dev-base: build every dev-base tier image and run the in-image CLIGUARD_NO_SANDBOX=1 ward doctor gate, plus tests/test_dev_base_image.py (the pin-consistency checks). No buildx --push, no tag, no registry auth - build-and-verify only.
  • Factor the build/verify steps out of release.yml's publish-dev-base so PR-validation and main-publish share one definition and cannot drift apart (the PR builds it, main builds-then-pushes it).
  • Audit the other main-only workflows for validations that belong on PRs too: release.yml's plan/doctor steps yes; mirror-to-github.yml is a deploy and stays main-only; dep-bump.yml/freshness.yml are scheduled and stay as-is. Bring the genuine validations onto PRs, leave publish/deploy/mirror on main.
  • Make the PR docker-build a required status check (branch protection) so a red build blocks merge.

Acceptance

  • A PR that edits a docker/dev-base/** Dockerfile, bumps a pinned ARG, or desyncs WARD_VERSION / the swagger-lock / the test_dev_base_image.py pins fails its own PR CI, not a later main push.
  • The dev-base image build is a required PR check, sharing its build/verify definition with release.yml so the two cannot diverge.
  • Publish, tag, and the GitHub mirror remain main-only.

Context

Directed by Kai on the aos#452 thread: add the docker build (and whatever else only runs on main) into PR CI as a validation step. This is the prevention for the aos#452 class - main going red on a merge because PRs never exercised what main does. A broken publish-dev-base also starves engineers of a current :latest (the stale-image / 404-release-binary failures seen during the infrastructure#538 recovery), so catching it pre-merge protects the whole fleet's image supply. Refs: aos#452 (the incident), .forgejo/workflows/ci.yml, .forgejo/workflows/release.yml, tests/test_dev_base_image.py, docs/dev-base-image.md, docs/dev-base-auto-bump.md.

## Run the dev-base docker build + main-only validations on PRs (build-only, no publish) Today the dev-base docker build lives in [`release.yml`](../src/branch/main/.forgejo/workflows/release.yml), which triggers on **`push: [main]` only**. `ci.yml` runs on `pull_request` but only the test gate - it never builds the image. So a PR cannot fail on anything the docker build catches: a broken Dockerfile, a stale `ARG WARD_VERSION`, a swagger-lock vs `ward doctor` desync, or a dep-bump pin drift. All of those only surface **after merge, red on main** - which is exactly the aos#452 incident (`publish-dev-base` failing on main, so landed pin bumps never reach `:latest`). The fix is to shift that validation left: **build and verify the dev-base image on every PR as a required check, without publishing.** Publish/tag/mirror stay main-only (you never publish from a PR), but the build + in-image gate runs pre-merge so main-breakage is caught on the PR that causes it. ## Do - Add a `pull_request`-triggered job (in `ci.yml`, or a reusable job release.yml also calls) that runs the **build + verify** half of `publish-dev-base`: build every dev-base tier image and run the in-image `CLIGUARD_NO_SANDBOX=1 ward doctor` gate, plus `tests/test_dev_base_image.py` (the pin-consistency checks). **No `buildx --push`, no tag, no registry auth** - build-and-verify only. - Factor the build/verify steps out of release.yml's `publish-dev-base` so PR-validation and main-publish share one definition and cannot drift apart (the PR builds it, main builds-then-pushes it). - Audit the other main-only workflows for validations that belong on PRs too: `release.yml`'s plan/doctor steps yes; `mirror-to-github.yml` is a deploy and stays main-only; `dep-bump.yml`/`freshness.yml` are scheduled and stay as-is. Bring the genuine *validations* onto PRs, leave publish/deploy/mirror on main. - Make the PR docker-build a required status check (branch protection) so a red build blocks merge. ## Acceptance - A PR that edits a `docker/dev-base/**` Dockerfile, bumps a pinned `ARG`, or desyncs `WARD_VERSION` / the swagger-lock / the `test_dev_base_image.py` pins **fails its own PR CI**, not a later main push. - The dev-base image build is a required PR check, sharing its build/verify definition with release.yml so the two cannot diverge. - Publish, tag, and the GitHub mirror remain main-only. ## Context Directed by Kai on the aos#452 thread: add the docker build (and whatever else only runs on main) into PR CI **as a validation step**. This is the prevention for the aos#452 class - main going red on a merge because PRs never exercised what main does. A broken publish-dev-base also starves engineers of a current `:latest` (the stale-image / 404-release-binary failures seen during the infrastructure#538 recovery), so catching it pre-merge protects the whole fleet's image supply. Refs: aos#452 (the incident), `.forgejo/workflows/ci.yml`, `.forgejo/workflows/release.yml`, `tests/test_dev_base_image.py`, docs/dev-base-image.md, docs/dev-base-auto-bump.md.
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-10 22:20:50 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARD-OUTCOME: submitted

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA)

PR: #456 (branch issue-454, head 7c51971). Deliverable: the build/verify half of publish-dev-base factored into the shared actions/dev-base-build composite, ci.yml runs it on every pull_request build-only (no push, no tag, no registry auth) plus a compute-only tag-bump dry run in gate, release.yml re-consumes the same composite with push: "true", docs walkthrough at docs/pr-dev-base-build-validation.md, contract tests in tests/test_dev_base_build_action.py. 463 tests and the full pre-commit suite green locally.

Check state at handoff: ci / gate green (including the new steps). ci / build-dev-base red - deliberately left so, because it is the live aos#452 incident surfaced pre-merge, which is this feature's acceptance behavior. Verified across ward versions (matrix posted on aos#452 and PR #456): no shipped ward passes doctor against the lock-less bundle, unblock is ward-side (ward#1064). The check goes green with zero further change to this branch once aos#452's pin bump lands, since PR and publish share one definition. Merging now is safe: release.yml behavior on main is unchanged.

Retrospective: the factoring itself felt clean (the composite is a near-verbatim lift of the publish steps, with push-only side effects fail-closed behind the input). The surprise was the first live run instantly reproducing aos#452 - validating the feature but denying a green check. Second surprise: .ward/ bundle vs ward-version doctor compatibility has no valid pairing at all right now, which was worth pinning down empirically (source-built v0.604.0, tested v0.605.0, read ward HEAD) rather than assuming a pin bump would do. Confidence in the change itself: high. Confidence the red check clears without touching this branch: high, contingent on ward#1064-class work.

Follow-ups filed: #457 (make ci / build-dev-base required in branch protection - deferred deliberately, and this run's token got 403 on /branch_protections). aos#452 carries the remaining red-main work with the fresh diagnosis. Branch-protection audit of other main-only workflows: mirror-to-github.yml deploy stays main-only, dep-bump.yml/freshness.yml scheduled stay as-is, release plan/doctor validations brought onto PRs per the issue.

WARD-OUTCOME: submitted <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA) PR: #456 (branch `issue-454`, head 7c51971). Deliverable: the build/verify half of `publish-dev-base` factored into the shared `actions/dev-base-build` composite, `ci.yml` runs it on every pull_request build-only (no push, no tag, no registry auth) plus a compute-only tag-bump dry run in `gate`, release.yml re-consumes the same composite with `push: "true"`, docs walkthrough at `docs/pr-dev-base-build-validation.md`, contract tests in `tests/test_dev_base_build_action.py`. 463 tests and the full pre-commit suite green locally. Check state at handoff: `ci / gate` green (including the new steps). `ci / build-dev-base` red - deliberately left so, because it is the live aos#452 incident surfaced pre-merge, which is this feature's acceptance behavior. Verified across ward versions (matrix posted on aos#452 and PR #456): no shipped ward passes doctor against the lock-less bundle, unblock is ward-side (ward#1064). The check goes green with zero further change to this branch once aos#452's pin bump lands, since PR and publish share one definition. Merging now is safe: release.yml behavior on main is unchanged. Retrospective: the factoring itself felt clean (the composite is a near-verbatim lift of the publish steps, with push-only side effects fail-closed behind the input). The surprise was the first live run instantly reproducing aos#452 - validating the feature but denying a green check. Second surprise: `.ward/` bundle vs ward-version doctor compatibility has no valid pairing at all right now, which was worth pinning down empirically (source-built v0.604.0, tested v0.605.0, read ward HEAD) rather than assuming a pin bump would do. Confidence in the change itself: high. Confidence the red check clears without touching this branch: high, contingent on ward#1064-class work. Follow-ups filed: #457 (make `ci / build-dev-base` required in branch protection - deferred deliberately, and this run's token got 403 on `/branch_protections`). aos#452 carries the remaining red-main work with the fresh diagnosis. Branch-protection audit of other main-only workflows: `mirror-to-github.yml` deploy stays main-only, `dep-bump.yml`/`freshness.yml` scheduled stay as-is, release plan/doctor validations brought onto PRs per the issue. </details>
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-10 22:52:30 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA)

PR: #456. ci / gate is green on run 1014. ci / build-dev-base is red on the same run after 2m24s. The branch content is merged with main, but the dev-base build still fails in the shared build/verify step. The blocker is still the ward-side bundle compatibility issue already diagnosed in the thread, so this repo cannot clear the check alone.

Retrospective: the wiring held. The surprise was that the main merge did not move the live build result. Confidence: high in the diagnosis, low that more repo-only edits will help. Follow-up: wait for the ward-side fix, then rerun the PR.

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA) PR: #456. `ci / gate` is green on run 1014. `ci / build-dev-base` is red on the same run after 2m24s. The branch content is merged with `main`, but the dev-base build still fails in the shared build/verify step. The blocker is still the ward-side bundle compatibility issue already diagnosed in the thread, so this repo cannot clear the check alone. Retrospective: the wiring held. The surprise was that the `main` merge did not move the live build result. Confidence: high in the diagnosis, low that more repo-only edits will help. Follow-up: wait for the ward-side fix, then rerun the PR. </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature -->
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-14 09:16:26 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default)

PR: #456. ci / gate passed on run 1233. ci / build-dev-base failed on the same run after 3m25s. The branch change here was doc-only, so the failure is still the shared dev-base build path, not this docs edit. Confidence: high that this is the same external blocker seen before. Follow-up: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun the PR.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default) PR: #456. `ci / gate` passed on run 1233. `ci / build-dev-base` failed on the same run after 3m25s. The branch change here was doc-only, so the failure is still the shared dev-base build path, not this docs edit. Confidence: high that this is the same external blocker seen before. Follow-up: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun the PR. </details>
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-14 10:07:57 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

Director burn-down update from 2026-07-14: PR #456 is open but Forgejo reports mergeable: false. ward ops forgejo pr update coilyco-flight-deck agentic-os 456 returned 409 Conflict with merge failed because of conflict, so this branch needs repair once the dispatch broker is reachable again.

Director burn-down update from 2026-07-14: PR #456 is open but Forgejo reports `mergeable: false`. `ward ops forgejo pr update coilyco-flight-deck agentic-os 456` returned 409 Conflict with `merge failed because of conflict`, so this branch needs repair once the dispatch broker is reachable again.
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-14 15:23:39 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-14T15:23:38Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454 · branch issue-454 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 · ward v0.686.0 · dispatched 2026-07-14T15:23:29Z
  • Comment thread: 4 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.686.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-14T15:23:38Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454` · branch `issue-454` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` · ward `v0.686.0` · dispatched `2026-07-14T15:23:29Z` - **Comment thread:** 4 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:20:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:52:30Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T09:16:26Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T10:07:57Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.686.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-14 15:37:18 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA)

PR: #456. ci / gate passed on the reopened run. ci / build-dev-base failed again after 4m4s on the merge ref for this PR. The branch-protection write for main is still blocked from this runner with 403 on the Forgejo branch-protection API, so the required-check follow-up cannot be completed from here. Confidence: high this is the same external dev-base blocker seen before. Follow-up: wait on the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix and the admin-side protection update, then rerun.

Retrospective: the branch wiring held, and the failure reproduced exactly as before. The surprise was that reopening the PR immediately re-queued the same failing merge-ref run without any new code drift.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA) PR: #456. `ci / gate` passed on the reopened run. `ci / build-dev-base` failed again after 4m4s on the merge ref for this PR. The branch-protection write for `main` is still blocked from this runner with 403 on the Forgejo branch-protection API, so the required-check follow-up cannot be completed from here. Confidence: high this is the same external dev-base blocker seen before. Follow-up: wait on the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix and the admin-side protection update, then rerun. Retrospective: the branch wiring held, and the failure reproduced exactly as before. The surprise was that reopening the PR immediately re-queued the same failing merge-ref run without any new code drift. </details>
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-14 18:46:48 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-14T18:46:47Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454 · branch issue-454 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 · ward v0.689.0 · dispatched 2026-07-14T18:46:40Z
  • Comment thread: 5 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.689.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-14T18:46:47Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454` · branch `issue-454` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` · ward `v0.689.0` · dispatched `2026-07-14T18:46:40Z` - **Comment thread:** 5 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:20:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:52:30Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T09:16:26Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T10:07:57Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:37:18Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:23:39Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.689.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-14 19:04:46 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #536

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA)

felt: clean after the rebase onto current main. the snag was container disk pressure, so full pre-commit could not finish here.
confidence: high on the CI wiring, medium on merge readiness until the director clears PR 536.
surprises: the old PR branch could not be updated without a force push, so a fresh branch and PR were needed.
follow-ups: director merge PR 536, then close the stale PR 456 if it stays redundant.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os/pulls/536 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA) felt: clean after the rebase onto current main. the snag was container disk pressure, so full pre-commit could not finish here. confidence: high on the CI wiring, medium on merge readiness until the director clears PR 536. surprises: the old PR branch could not be updated without a force push, so a fresh branch and PR were needed. follow-ups: director merge PR 536, then close the stale PR 456 if it stays redundant. </details>
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-15 00:58:15 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T00:58:15Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454 · branch issue-454 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 · ward v0.693.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T00:58:06Z
  • Comment thread: 6 included in the pre-flight read, 2 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.693.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T00:58:15Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454` · branch `issue-454` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` · ward `v0.693.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T00:58:06Z` - **Comment thread:** 6 included in the pre-flight read, 2 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:20:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:52:30Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T09:16:26Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T10:07:57Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:37:18Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T19:04:46Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:23:39Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:46:48Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.693.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-15 01:12:20 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA)

ci / gate passed on PR #541. ci / build-dev-base failed after 4m39s on the same PR. I could not recover a repo-local fix from this run, and the failure still matches the dev-base build/doctor blocker seen before.

felt: clean until the shared dev-base path tripped again.
confidence: high that this is still external to this repo.
surprises: the fresh PR on the current branch did not change the outcome.
follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA) ci / gate passed on PR #541. ci / build-dev-base failed after 4m39s on the same PR. I could not recover a repo-local fix from this run, and the failure still matches the dev-base build/doctor blocker seen before. felt: clean until the shared dev-base path tripped again. confidence: high that this is still external to this repo. surprises: the fresh PR on the current branch did not change the outcome. follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541. </details>
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-15 01:14:47 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T01:14:47Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454 · branch issue-454 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 · ward v0.693.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T01:14:37Z
  • Comment thread: 7 included in the pre-flight read, 3 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.693.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T01:14:47Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454` · branch `issue-454` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` · ward `v0.693.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T01:14:37Z` - **Comment thread:** 7 included in the pre-flight read, 3 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:20:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:52:30Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T09:16:26Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T10:07:57Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:37:18Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T19:04:46Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T01:12:20Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:23:39Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:46:48Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T00:58:15Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.693.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-15 01:35:42 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA)

ci / ward-doctor failed after 12s, ci / gate failed after 11s, and ci / build-dev-base failed after 3m37s on PR #541.
felt: the PR wiring was straightforward, but the same external dev-base blocker still won.
confidence: high that the remaining failure is external to this repo.
surprises: the build-only job stayed red on the refreshed head even after the branch was rebased onto current main.
follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA) ci / ward-doctor failed after 12s, ci / gate failed after 11s, and ci / build-dev-base failed after 3m37s on PR #541. felt: the PR wiring was straightforward, but the same external dev-base blocker still won. confidence: high that the remaining failure is external to this repo. surprises: the build-only job stayed red on the refreshed head even after the branch was rebased onto current main. follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541. </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature -->
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-15 03:05:59 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T03:05:58Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454 · branch issue-454 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 · ward v0.695.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T03:05:49Z
  • Comment thread: 8 included in the pre-flight read, 4 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.695.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T03:05:58Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454` · branch `issue-454` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` · ward `v0.695.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T03:05:49Z` - **Comment thread:** 8 included in the pre-flight read, 4 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:20:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:52:30Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T09:16:26Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T10:07:57Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:37:18Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T19:04:46Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T01:12:20Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T01:35:42Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:23:39Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:46:48Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T00:58:15Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T01:14:47Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.695.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-15 03:11:16 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA)

ci / ward-doctor failed after 12s, ci / gate failed after 11s, and ci / build-dev-base failed after 3m37s on PR #541.
I could not recover a repo-local fix from this run.
felt: the PR wiring was straightforward, but the shared dev-base blocker still won.
confidence: high that the remaining failure is external to this repo.
follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA) ci / ward-doctor failed after 12s, ci / gate failed after 11s, and ci / build-dev-base failed after 3m37s on PR #541. I could not recover a repo-local fix from this run. felt: the PR wiring was straightforward, but the shared dev-base blocker still won. confidence: high that the remaining failure is external to this repo. follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541. </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature -->
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-15 03:11:27 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA)

felt: the wiring was straightforward, but the shared dev-base blocker still won.
confidence: high that the remaining failure is external to this repo.
surprises: the build-only job stayed red on the refreshed head even after the branch was rebased onto current main.
follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA) felt: the wiring was straightforward, but the shared dev-base blocker still won. confidence: high that the remaining failure is external to this repo. surprises: the build-only job stayed red on the refreshed head even after the branch was rebased onto current main. follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541. </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature -->
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-15 03:23:22 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-agentic-os-454 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T03:23:21Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.695.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T03:23:21Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454` · branch `issue-454` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-agentic-os-454` · ward `v0.695.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T03:23:09Z` - **Comment thread:** 10 included in the pre-flight read, 5 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:20:50Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T22:52:30Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T09:16:26Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T10:07:57Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:37:18Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T19:04:46Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T01:12:20Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T01:35:42Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T03:11:16Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T03:11:27Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T15:23:39Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T18:46:48Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T00:58:15Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T01:14:47Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-15T03:05:59Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.695.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-15 03:42:02 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: failed ❌

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA)

ci / ward-doctor passed, ci / gate passed, and ci / build-dev-base failed after 7m50s on PR #541.
felt: the merge held, but the shared dev-base build/doctor path still tripped.
confidence: high the blocker is external to this repo.
surprises: the refreshed head kept the same failure.
follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: failed ❌ <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA) ci / ward-doctor passed, ci / gate passed, and ci / build-dev-base failed after 7m50s on PR #541. felt: the merge held, but the shared dev-base build/doctor path still tripped. confidence: high the blocker is external to this repo. surprises: the refreshed head kept the same failure. follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541. </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature -->
coilyco-ops commented 2026-07-15 03:42:20 +00:00
Author
Member
Copy link

WARDED_WORKFLOW: failed ❌

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA)

ci / ward-doctor passed, ci / gate passed, and ci / build-dev-base failed after 7m50s on PR #541.
felt: the merge wiring held, but the shared dev-base build/doctor path still tripped.
confidence: high the blocker is external to this repo.
surprises: the refreshed head kept the same failure.
follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: failed ❌ <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (in-container review gate intentionally skipped, the temporary ward default pending brokered QA) ci / ward-doctor passed, ci / gate passed, and ci / build-dev-base failed after 7m50s on PR #541. felt: the merge wiring held, but the shared dev-base build/doctor path still tripped. confidence: high the blocker is external to this repo. surprises: the refreshed head kept the same failure. follow-ups: wait for the ward-side build/doctor compatibility fix, then rerun PR #541. </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature -->
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
release
issue-573
fix-action-run-list-page
issue-568
issue-565
issue-454
issue-561
issue-556-replacement
issue-553
issue-539-profile-substrate
issue-454-v2
issue-505
issue-504
issue-501
issue-499
issue-496
issue-491
issue-490
issue-488
issue-486
feat/two-stage-release
fix/comment-cap-and-pr-gate
feat/sync-actions-secrets
fix/actions-logs-bridge
fix/launch-config-stability
fix/defaults-are-wards-not-aos
experiment/no-ops-forgejo
fix/ci-pytest-gate-and-repos-kdl
issue-434
issue-447
issue-453
issue-450
issue-446
issue-435
issue-393
issue-268
issue-438
issue-397
issue-419
issue-431
issue-427
issue-425
issue-421
issue-422
issue-403
issue-805
issue-355
issue-362-clean2
issue-356
issue-343
issue-315
issue-223
v0.252.0
v0.251.0
v0.250.0
v0.249.0
v0.248.0
v0.247.0
v0.246.0
v0.245.0
v0.244.0
v0.243.0
v0.242.0
v0.241.0
v0.240.0
v0.239.0
v0.238.0
v0.237.0
v0.236.0
v0.235.0
v0.234.0
v0.233.0
v0.232.0
v0.231.0
v0.230.0
v0.229.0
v0.228.0
v0.227.0
v0.226.0
v0.225.0
v0.224.0
v0.223.0
v0.222.0
v0.221.0
v0.220.0
v0.219.0
v0.218.0
v0.217.0
v0.216.0
v0.215.0
v0.214.0
v0.213.0
v0.212.0
v0.211.0
v0.210.0
v0.209.0
v0.208.0
v0.207.0
v0.206.0
v0.205.0
v0.204.0
v0.203.0
v0.202.0
v0.201.0
v0.200.0
v0.199.0
v0.198.0
v0.197.0
v0.196.0
v0.195.0
v0.194.0
v0.193.0
v0.192.0
v0.191.0
v0.190.0
v0.189.0
v0.188.0
v0.187.0
v0.186.0
v0.185.0
v0.184.0
v0.183.0
v0.182.0
v0.181.0
v0.180.0
v0.179.0
v0.178.0
v0.177.0
v0.176.0
v0.175.0
v0.174.0
v0.173.0
v0.172.0
v0.171.0
v0.170.0
v0.169.0
v0.168.0
v0.167.0
v0.166.0
v0.165.0
v0.164.0
v0.163.0
v0.162.0
v0.161.0
v0.160.0
v0.159.0
v0.158.0
v0.157.0
v0.156.0
v0.155.0
v0.154.0
v0.153.0
v0.152.0
v0.151.0
v0.150.0
v0.149.0
v0.148.0
v0.147.0
v0.146.0
v0.145.0
v0.144.0
v0.143.0
v0.142.0
v0.141.0
v0.140.0
v0.139.0
v0.138.0
v0.137.0
v0.136.0
v0.135.0
v0.134.0
v0.133.0
v0.132.0
v0.131.0
v0.130.0
v0.129.0
v0.128.0
v0.127.0
v0.126.0
v0.125.0
v0.124.0
v0.123.0
v0.122.0
v0.121.0
v0.120.0
v0.119.0
v0.118.0
v0.117.0
v0.116.0
v0.115.0
v0.114.0
v0.113.0
v0.112.0
v0.111.0
v0.110.0
v0.109.0
v0.108.0
v0.107.0
v0.106.0
v0.105.0
v0.104.0
v0.103.0
v0.102.0
v0.101.0
v0.100.0
v0.99.0
v0.98.0
v0.97.0
v0.96.0
v0.95.0
v0.94.0
v0.93.0
v0.92.0
v0.91.0
v0.90.0
v0.89.0
v0.88.0
v0.87.0
v0.86.0
v0.85.0
v0.84.0
v0.83.0
v0.82.0
v0.81.0
v0.80.0
v0.79.0
v0.78.0
v0.77.0
v0.76.0
v0.75.0
v0.74.0
v0.73.0
v0.72.0
v0.71.0
v0.70.0
v0.69.0
v0.68.0
v0.67.0
v0.66.0
v0.65.0
v0.64.0
v0.63.0
v0.62.0
v0.61.0
v0.60.0
v0.59.0
v0.58.0
v0.57.0
v0.56.0
v0.55.0
v0.54.0
v0.53.0
v0.52.0
v0.51.0
v0.50.0
v0.49.0
v0.48.0
v0.47.0
v0.46.0
v0.45.0
v0.44.0
v0.43.0
v0.42.0
v0.41.0
v0.40.0
v0.39.0
v0.38.0
v0.37.0
v0.36.0
v0.35.0
v0.34.0
v0.33.0
v0.32.0
v0.31.0
v0.30.0
v0.29.0
v0.28.0
v0.27.0
v0.26.0
v0.25.0
v0.24.0
v0.23.0
v0.22.0
v0.21.0
v0.20.0
v0.19.0
v0.18.0
v0.17.0
v0.16.0
v0.15.0
v0.14.0
v0.13.1
v0.13.0
v0.12.0
v0.11.1
v0.11.0
v0.10.0
v0.9.0
v0.8.0
v0.7.0
v0.6.0
v0.5.0
v0.4.0
v0.3.0
v0.2.12
v0.2.11
v0.2.10
v0.2.9
v0.2.8
v0.2.7
v0.2.6
v0.2.5
v0.2.4
v0.2.3
v0.2.2
v0.2.1
v0.2.0
v0.1.0
Labels
Clear labels   
burndown-2026-06
Backlog burndown June 2026

  
coherence-core
Core review set for the warded control plane coherence milestone. These issues form the release spine; adjacent milestone issues are stretch or supporting work.

  
consult
A human decision, design, or external action must happen first. Fail-closed default for unlabeled/low-confidence.

  
headless
Agent can take it from open issue to merged change with no human in the loop. The auto-burndown queue.

  
interactive
Agent does the work but pauses at a human checkpoint mid-flight (design choice, destructive step, human-only verification).

  
P0
now / blocking / urgent

  
P1
next / important

  
P2
backlog / will do

  
P3
someday / low

  
P4
icebox / frozen / reopen if it becomes real

No labels
burndown-2026-06
coherence-core
consult
headless
interactive
P0
P1
P2
P3
P4
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#454
No description provided.