Pause interactive launches after the role intro #137
Labels
No labels
autonomy
async-consult
autonomy
epic
autonomy
headless
autonomy
live-collab
coherence-core
priority
P0
priority
P1
priority
P2
priority
P3
priority
P4
qa-fixture
role/ai
role/creator
role/design
role/director
role/engineer
role/exec
role/human
role/ops
role/qa
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/agent-compose#137
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Outcome
Make the assigned-role intro a deliberate, readable threshold before an interactive harness starts. Print everything at normal speed, place the role overview and ordered personality meld last, then wait for Enter before handing the terminal to the harness.
Follow-up to #136.
Current experience
#136 added the TTY-aware role transcript, but the transcript completes almost instantly and the harness starts immediately afterward. Kai manually scrolls back to read it on every launch. Claude's transition into its TUI may replace the visible terminal buffer entirely.
The current information hierarchy also puts the most interesting content, the role overview and personality meld, first. Routine composition output then pushes it away from the launch boundary.
This is a repeated launch ritual, not first-run education. Remembered “seen” state and artificial slow printing would solve the wrong problem.
Interaction
For an interactive TTY launch:
Press Enter to continue.For a non-interactive, piped, or headless launch, preserve the current behavior and never wait for input.
Acceptance criteria
Press Enter to continue.Design rationale
The extra Enter replaces an existing manual scroll-back action and guarantees the identity text survives until Kai has read it. If repeated use later shows that the acknowledgement itself is the problem, that evidence can motivate an opt-out. No preference surface is needed for this change.