Source homepage Project descriptions from each repository's canonical copy #130
Labels
No labels
autonomy
async-consult
autonomy
epic
autonomy
headless
autonomy
live-collab
burndown-2026-06
burndown-2026-08
icebox
priority
P0
priority
P1
priority
P2
priority
P3
priority
P4
role/ai
role/creator
role/design
role/director
role/engineer
role/exec
role/human
role/ops
role/qa
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
coilysiren/website#130
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Outcome
Every description beneath a homepage Project card comes from the project's own canonical repository copy, rather than an agent-written paraphrase.
Why
The existing card descriptions match the intended editorial style, but they were free-handed. That loses Kai's voice and can make a card subtly inaccurate even when it reads well. The website should surface the project's own words.
Source rule
For each project card, take the description from the first available source in this order:
Keep the selected copy verbatim apart from purely mechanical presentation changes such as whitespace. Do not combine sentences from several sources or invent connective copy. If no suitable canonical text exists, leave the card without a description and record the missing source as follow-up work.
Store the selected source location alongside the website data so a later edit can be traced and refreshed without rediscovering the decision.
Acceptance