fair_price returns no in-game evidence at all and silently rewrites the requested item #234
Labels
No labels
burndown-2026-06
headless
autonomy
async-consult
autonomy
epic
autonomy
headless
autonomy
live-collab
c#
priority
P0
priority
P1
priority
P2
priority
P3
priority
P4
role/ai
role/creator
role/design
role/director
role/engineer
role/exec
role/human
role/ops
role/qa
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
coilyco-gaming/eco-app#234
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
QA sweep, Eco via Sirens, day 40, 2026-08-12.
Observed
fair_price(item="IronIngot")returns:Two problems:
inGame*fields are null, so the advertised behaviour — "compare an Eco item's in-game market evidence with a real-world benchmark" — degrades to a bare commodity quote. The server has an active ledger, andfind_tradeproves per-item in-game prices are derivable from it.IronIngot;itemcomes back asIronand the benchmark is iron ore (PIORECRUSDM). Ore and ingot are different goods at different points in the chain. Thenarrativestring still says "in-cycle fair price for IronIngot", so one response names two different items as the subject.Expected
requested: "IronIngot", benchmarked_as: "iron ore", reason: …).inGame*from the ledger, or say why it could not be.Likely dependency
The in-game side probably depends on whatever is breaking
get_market(emptymarkets[]) — worth fixing together.