coilyco-flight-deck/ward

Fork 0

ward salvage branch created with 1 million LOC #890

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-09 23:46:22 +00:00 by coilysiren · 3 comments

coilysiren commented

2026-07-09 23:46:22 +00:00

Owner

Which surface

The agent driver (ward agent / warded)

What happened

On this branch: ward-salvage/ward-193d3145

What you expected

not that???

Steps to reproduce

container name engineer-codex-ward-692

this issue #692

logs attached

ward version

0.540.0

OS and install method

mac

Before filing

I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
This is not a security vulnerability (those follow SECURITY.md).

### Which surface The agent driver (ward agent / warded) ### What happened On this branch: ward-salvage/ward-193d3145 ### What you expected not that??? ### Steps to reproduce container name engineer-codex-ward-692 this issue https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/issues/692 logs attached ### ward version 0.540.0 ### OS and install method mac ### Before filing - [x] I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] This is not a security vulnerability (those follow SECURITY.md).

errant-engineer.txt

1.5 MiB

coilysiren added the

label

2026-07-09 23:46:22 +00:00

coilyco-ops added the

headless

label

2026-07-10 00:42:14 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 00:43:55 +00:00

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-890 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-10T00:43:53Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#890 · branch issue-890 · harness codex · workflow pull-requests-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-890 · ward v0.543.0 · dispatched 2026-07-10T00:43:53Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.543.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-890` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-10T00:43:53Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#890` · branch `issue-890` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-requests-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-890` · ward `v0.543.0` · dispatched `2026-07-10T00:43:53Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.543.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 00:44:42 +00:00

Member

WARD-DISPATCH: failed ❌

failure details

This forwarded dispatch failed after the issue was already reserved.

Attempted harness: codex
Attempted run: ward agent engineer coilyco-flight-deck/ward#890 --harness codex --image forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os --tag latest
Container: engineer-codex-ward-890
Container created: no running engineer was observed.
Host log: /Users/kai/.ward/agent-logs/dispatch/20260710T004438Z-director-codex-zv98-coilyco-flight-deck-ward-890.log
Failure: ward agent engineer --harness codex: issue coilyco-flight-deck/ward#890 already has a running worker container engineer-codex-ward-890; wait for it to finish or pass --force to reclaim

Retry: choose another harness if the first one is down, or rerun with --force if the reservation is stale.

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-DISPATCH: failed ❌ <details><summary>failure details</summary> This forwarded dispatch failed after the issue was already reserved. Attempted harness: `codex` Attempted run: `ward agent engineer coilyco-flight-deck/ward#890 --harness codex --image forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os --tag latest` Container: `engineer-codex-ward-890` Container created: no running engineer was observed. Host log: `/Users/kai/.ward/agent-logs/dispatch/20260710T004438Z-director-codex-zv98-coilyco-flight-deck-ward-890.log` Failure: `ward agent engineer --harness codex: issue coilyco-flight-deck/ward#890 already has a running worker container engineer-codex-ward-890; wait for it to finish or pass --force to reclaim` Retry: choose another harness if the first one is down, or rerun with `--force` if the reservation is stale. </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue

2026-07-10 00:45:41 +00:00

Director surface heartbeat marks broker-forwarded runs failed when local Docker is unavailable #900

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-10 00:52:57 +00:00

fix: abort bootstrap when agent binary is missing #909

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 01:00:26 +00:00

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: merge-ready

details

workflow: pull-requests-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default

Implementation felt straightforward once the missing-binary path was isolated.
Confidence: high.
Surprise: CI also wanted the existing launchAgentContainer lint suppressions.
Follow-up: merge PR #909 when the director sweep is ready.

WARD-OUTCOME: merge-ready <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-requests-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default Implementation felt straightforward once the missing-binary path was isolated. Confidence: high. Surprise: CI also wanted the existing launchAgentContainer lint suppressions. Follow-up: merge PR #909 when the director sweep is ready. </details>

coilysiren closed this issue

2026-07-10 01:07:03 +00:00