Route warded local engineers through agent-proxy with correlation metadata

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 19:05:55 +00:00

Member

Goal

Make agent-proxy transparent for ward agent / warded engineer runs while giving agent-proxy enough stable metadata to correlate LLM request traces with ward run logs in SigNoz.

Requirements

Keep the operator UX unchanged: warded engineer owner/repo#N --harness <harness> still works without extra flags.
For compatible OpenAI-style local harnesses, route the model backend through the host-local agent-proxy endpoint from inside the container, e.g. http://host.docker.internal:8082/v1 or the k3s service endpoint when the run is cluster-side.
Emit a correlation envelope from ward into the agent environment and into LLM HTTP requests where the harness supports it.
Do not put high-cardinality run ids into Prometheus metric labels. They belong in traces/logs and request ids.

Proposed correlation fields

Stable fields ward already knows at launch time:

ward.run_id - the run/container identity, likely WARD_CONTAINER_NAME.
ward.container_name - same if no separate run id exists yet.
ward.role - engineer/director/advisor/qa.
ward.harness - codex/opencode/goose/claude.
ward.target_repo - owner/name.
ward.issue_ref - owner/name#N when present.
ward.workflow - direct-to-main/pull-request/etc.
ward.context_level - 0/1/2.
ward.version - ward binary version.
Harness-native thread/session id when present, e.g. CODEX_THREAD_ID.

Transport

Prefer both of these where possible:

x-request-id: <ward.run_id>:<short sequence-or-random> so agent-proxy can already link existing traces.
x-ward-* headers, or an equivalent provider-supported metadata/default-header config, for the fields above.

If a harness cannot send custom headers, ward should still inject env/config for the base URL/model and expose the envelope in env so a later wrapper can use it.

Acceptance

ward agent --print shows the selected agent-proxy endpoint and the correlation envelope without secrets.
A headless local engineer call creates agent-proxy spans/logs queryable by service.name=agent-proxy and joinable to ward-run logs by ward.run_id / agentproxy.request_id.
Cloud-only harnesses are not silently broken. They either keep their current backend or fail loud behind an explicit config gate.

Context from director exploration on 2026-07-09: agent-proxy currently accepts OpenAI-compatible calls and records only x-request-id as agentproxy.request_id; ward containers already expose WARD_CONTAINER_NAME, WARD_ROLE, WARD_AGENT, WARD_TARGET_REPO, WARD_WORKFLOW, WARD_CONTEXT_LEVEL, WARD_VERSION, and harness ids such as CODEX_THREAD_ID.

## Goal Make agent-proxy transparent for `ward agent` / `warded` engineer runs while giving agent-proxy enough stable metadata to correlate LLM request traces with ward run logs in SigNoz. ## Requirements * Keep the operator UX unchanged: `warded engineer owner/repo#N --harness <harness>` still works without extra flags. * For compatible OpenAI-style local harnesses, route the model backend through the host-local agent-proxy endpoint from inside the container, e.g. `http://host.docker.internal:8082/v1` or the k3s service endpoint when the run is cluster-side. * Emit a correlation envelope from ward into the agent environment and into LLM HTTP requests where the harness supports it. * Do not put high-cardinality run ids into Prometheus metric labels. They belong in traces/logs and request ids. ## Proposed correlation fields Stable fields ward already knows at launch time: * `ward.run_id` - the run/container identity, likely `WARD_CONTAINER_NAME`. * `ward.container_name` - same if no separate run id exists yet. * `ward.role` - engineer/director/advisor/qa. * `ward.harness` - codex/opencode/goose/claude. * `ward.target_repo` - owner/name. * `ward.issue_ref` - owner/name#N when present. * `ward.workflow` - direct-to-main/pull-request/etc. * `ward.context_level` - 0/1/2. * `ward.version` - ward binary version. * Harness-native thread/session id when present, e.g. `CODEX_THREAD_ID`. ## Transport Prefer both of these where possible: * `x-request-id: <ward.run_id>:<short sequence-or-random>` so agent-proxy can already link existing traces. * `x-ward-*` headers, or an equivalent provider-supported metadata/default-header config, for the fields above. If a harness cannot send custom headers, ward should still inject env/config for the base URL/model and expose the envelope in env so a later wrapper can use it. ## Acceptance * `ward agent --print` shows the selected agent-proxy endpoint and the correlation envelope without secrets. * A headless local engineer call creates agent-proxy spans/logs queryable by `service.name=agent-proxy` and joinable to ward-run logs by `ward.run_id` / `agentproxy.request_id`. * Cloud-only harnesses are not silently broken. They either keep their current backend or fail loud behind an explicit config gate. Context from director exploration on 2026-07-09: agent-proxy currently accepts OpenAI-compatible calls and records only `x-request-id` as `agentproxy.request_id`; ward containers already expose `WARD_CONTAINER_NAME`, `WARD_ROLE`, `WARD_AGENT`, `WARD_TARGET_REPO`, `WARD_WORKFLOW`, `WARD_CONTEXT_LEVEL`, `WARD_VERSION`, and harness ids such as `CODEX_THREAD_ID`.

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from coilyco-flight-deck/agent-proxy

2026-07-09 19:06:12 +00:00

Ingest ward correlation metadata into agent-proxy traces and logs #38

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 19:06:22 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-861 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-09T19:06:19Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 · branch issue-861 · harness codex · workflow pull-request
Run: engineer-codex-ward-861 · ward v0.504.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T19:06:19Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.504.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-861` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-09T19:06:19Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861` · branch `issue-861` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-861` · ward `v0.504.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T19:06:19Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.504.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops added the

P2

headless

labels

2026-07-09 21:49:16 +00:00

coilyco-ops added

P1

and removed

P2

labels

2026-07-10 09:00:36 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 17:25:56 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-861 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-10T17:25:56Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 · branch issue-861 · harness codex · workflow pull-requests-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-861 · ward v0.584.0 · dispatched 2026-07-10T17:25:56Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T19:06:22Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.584.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-861` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-10T17:25:56Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861` · branch `issue-861` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-requests-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-861` · ward `v0.584.0` · dispatched `2026-07-10T17:25:56Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T19:06:22Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.584.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-10 17:49:24 +00:00

Route warded local engineers through agent-proxy with correlation metadata #1065

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 17:52:35 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: merge-ready

details

workflow: pull-requests-and-merge; review summary: skipped because review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default
felt: mostly plumbing, with one print-path mismatch and one lint cleanup
confidence: high
surprise: the repo still has an unrelated cmd/ward configsource test failure outside the changed slice
follow-ups: wait for merge on PR #1065

WARD-OUTCOME: merge-ready <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-requests-and-merge; review summary: skipped because review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default felt: mostly plumbing, with one print-path mismatch and one lint cleanup confidence: high surprise: the repo still has an unrelated cmd/ward configsource test failure outside the changed slice follow-ups: wait for merge on PR #1065 </details>

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 23:08:56 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-861 on host KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-10T23:08:56Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 · branch issue-861 · harness codex · workflow pull-requests-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-861 · ward v0.605.0 · dispatched 2026-07-10T23:08:56Z
Comment thread: 1 included in the pre-flight read, 2 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:52:35Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T19:06:22Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:25:56Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.605.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-861` on host `KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-10T23:08:56Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861` · branch `issue-861` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-requests-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-861` · ward `v0.605.0` · dispatched `2026-07-10T23:08:56Z` - **Comment thread:** 1 included in the pre-flight read, 2 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:52:35Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T19:06:22Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:25:56Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.605.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 23:19:42 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: submitted

details

workflow: pull-requests-and-merge; review summary: skipped because review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default
felt: mostly plumbing, with the request-id suffix tightening as the only functional change
confidence: high
surprise: the full ward exec test still trips an unrelated cmd/ward configsource cache-path failure in this container, but the touched packages passed
follow-ups: wait for PR #1065 to turn mergeable and land

WARD-OUTCOME: submitted <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-requests-and-merge; review summary: skipped because review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default felt: mostly plumbing, with the request-id suffix tightening as the only functional change confidence: high surprise: the full `ward exec test` still trips an unrelated `cmd/ward` configsource cache-path failure in this container, but the touched packages passed follow-ups: wait for PR #1065 to turn mergeable and land </details>

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-10 23:30:57 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-DISPATCH: failed ❌

failure details

This forwarded dispatch failed after the issue was already reserved.

Attempted harness: codex
Attempted run: ward agent engineer coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 --harness codex --ward-version v0.605.0 --details PR #1065 is green but Forgejo reports mergeable=false for head issue-861. Refresh or replace the branch, preserve the agent-proxy correlation metadata routing intent, get checks green, and land the issue end to end.
Container: engineer-codex-ward-861
Container created: no running engineer was observed.
Host log: C:\Users\firem\.ward\agent-logs\dispatch\20260710T233033Z-director-codex-yq57-coilyco-flight-deck-ward-861.log
Failure: ward agent engineer --harness codex: issue coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 is already reserved remotely (by @coilyco-ops at 2026-07-10T23:08:56Z); wait for it to finish or pass --force to override

Retry: choose another harness if the first one is down, or rerun with --force if the reservation is stale.

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-DISPATCH: failed ❌ <details><summary>failure details</summary> This forwarded dispatch failed after the issue was already reserved. Attempted harness: `codex` Attempted run: `ward agent engineer coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 --harness codex --ward-version v0.605.0 --details PR #1065 is green but Forgejo reports mergeable=false for head issue-861. Refresh or replace the branch, preserve the agent-proxy correlation metadata routing intent, get checks green, and land the issue end to end.` Container: `engineer-codex-ward-861` Container created: no running engineer was observed. Host log: `C:\Users\firem\.ward\agent-logs\dispatch\20260710T233033Z-director-codex-yq57-coilyco-flight-deck-ward-861.log` Failure: `ward agent engineer --harness codex: issue coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 is already reserved remotely (by @coilyco-ops at 2026-07-10T23:08:56Z); wait for it to finish or pass --force to override` Retry: choose another harness if the first one is down, or rerun with `--force` if the reservation is stale. </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-11 00:43:08 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-861 on host KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-11T00:43:09Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 · branch issue-861 · harness codex · workflow pull-requests-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-861 · ward v0.605.0 · dispatched 2026-07-11T00:43:09Z
Comment thread: 3 included in the pre-flight read, 3 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:52:35Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:19:42Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:30:57Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T19:06:22Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:25:56Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:08:56Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.605.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-861` on host `KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-11T00:43:09Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861` · branch `issue-861` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-requests-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-861` · ward `v0.605.0` · dispatched `2026-07-11T00:43:09Z` - **Comment thread:** 3 included in the pre-flight read, 3 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:52:35Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:19:42Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:30:57Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T19:06:22Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:25:56Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:08:56Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.605.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-11 00:56:30 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped because review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default
felt: the feature slice is merged and green locally, but the repo gate is blocked by a pre-existing cmd/ward configsource cache-path permission failure in full test runs
confidence: high
surprise: ward exec test still reproduces TestBuildForgejoOpsWithRealLookingConfigRef failing at cmd/ward/configsource_test.go:346 with /gitcache/config-bundle/... permission denied
follow-ups: fix the configsource cache-path permission issue, then rerun the PR checks

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-OUTCOME: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped because review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default felt: the feature slice is merged and green locally, but the repo gate is blocked by a pre-existing `cmd/ward` configsource cache-path permission failure in full test runs confidence: high surprise: `ward exec test` still reproduces `TestBuildForgejoOpsWithRealLookingConfigRef` failing at `cmd/ward/configsource_test.go:346` with `/gitcache/config-bundle/...` permission denied follow-ups: fix the configsource cache-path permission issue, then rerun the PR checks </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-11 01:01:19 +00:00

Author

Member

Single-thread repair context from director surface on 2026-07-11:

PR #1065 was repaired once from this issue branch and now points at 9a9a68c2f013. It is mergeable, but the pull-request test check failed on Actions run #1795 / internal run 6997 / job 11424.

The Forgejo Actions log bridge resolved the job ids but the log endpoint returned 404, and the job HTML payload only exposed test as failed without step detail. Please resume from the existing issue-861 branch, inspect the failure locally against current main, fix the branch, run the repo gates, push the PR head, and do not start unrelated ward work.

Single-thread repair context from director surface on 2026-07-11: PR `#1065` was repaired once from this issue branch and now points at `9a9a68c2f013`. It is mergeable, but the pull-request `test` check failed on Actions run `#1795` / internal run `6997` / job `11424`. The Forgejo Actions log bridge resolved the job ids but the log endpoint returned 404, and the job HTML payload only exposed `test` as failed without step detail. Please resume from the existing `issue-861` branch, inspect the failure locally against current `main`, fix the branch, run the repo gates, push the PR head, and do not start unrelated ward work.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-11 01:01:43 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-DISPATCH: failed ❌

failure details

This forwarded dispatch failed after the issue was already reserved.

Attempted harness: codex
Attempted run: ward agent engineer coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 --harness codex --ward-version v0.605.0
Container: engineer-codex-ward-861
Container created: no running engineer was observed.
Host log: C:\Users\firem\.ward\agent-logs\dispatch\20260711T010132Z-director-codex-yq57-coilyco-flight-deck-ward-861.log
Failure: ward agent engineer --harness codex: issue coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 is already reserved remotely (by @coilyco-ops at 2026-07-11T00:43:08Z); wait for it to finish or pass --force to override

Retry: choose another harness if the first one is down, or rerun with --force if the reservation is stale.

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-DISPATCH: failed ❌ <details><summary>failure details</summary> This forwarded dispatch failed after the issue was already reserved. Attempted harness: `codex` Attempted run: `ward agent engineer coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 --harness codex --ward-version v0.605.0` Container: `engineer-codex-ward-861` Container created: no running engineer was observed. Host log: `C:\Users\firem\.ward\agent-logs\dispatch\20260711T010132Z-director-codex-yq57-coilyco-flight-deck-ward-861.log` Failure: `ward agent engineer --harness codex: issue coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 is already reserved remotely (by @coilyco-ops at 2026-07-11T00:43:08Z); wait for it to finish or pass --force to override` Retry: choose another harness if the first one is down, or rerun with `--force` if the reservation is stale. </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-11 01:12:21 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-861 on host KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-11T01:12:22Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861 · branch issue-861 · harness codex · workflow pull-requests-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-861 · ward v0.605.0 · dispatched 2026-07-11T01:12:22Z
Comment thread: 6 included in the pre-flight read, 4 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:52:35Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:19:42Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:30:57Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-11T00:56:30Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-11T01:01:19Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-11T01:01:43Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T19:06:22Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:25:56Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:08:56Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-11T00:43:08Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.605.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-861` on host `KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-11T01:12:22Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL). `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#861` · branch `issue-861` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-requests-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-861` · ward `v0.605.0` · dispatched `2026-07-11T01:12:22Z` - **Comment thread:** 6 included in the pre-flight read, 4 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:52:35Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:19:42Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:30:57Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-11T00:56:30Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-11T01:01:19Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-11T01:01:43Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-09T19:06:22Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T17:25:56Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-10T23:08:56Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-11T00:43:08Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.605.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-11 01:18:25 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-11 01:18:47 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: submitted

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped because review gate intentionally skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default pending brokered QA
felt: mostly plumbing, with one stale workflow-env assertion
confidence: high
surprise: the branch was already green once the stale direct-main expectation was corrected
follow-ups: let PR #1065 merge through the director sweep

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-OUTCOME: submitted <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped because review gate intentionally skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default pending brokered QA felt: mostly plumbing, with one stale workflow-env assertion confidence: high surprise: the branch was already green once the stale direct-main expectation was corrected follow-ups: let PR #1065 merge through the director sweep  — Codex, via `ward agent` </details>

coilysiren referenced this issue

2026-07-14 15:27:09 +00:00

director should emit colorized, space buffered, visually distinct messages about the categories of actions its performing on startup #1283

Rows
Columns

Route warded local engineers through agent-proxy with correlation metadata #861

Goal

Requirements

Proposed correlation fields

Transport

Acceptance