Temporarily disable in-container review gate by default in code #797

Closed
opened 2026-07-09 09:23:57 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 2 comments
Member

Problem

The host-local ~/.ward/config.yaml kill switch now disables the in-container review gate for new dispatches on this host:

agent:
  review:
    skip:
      - role:engineer

That is useful immediately, but it is host-local. While brokered QA is being designed and review launch regressions are being repaired, ward should also carry a short-lived hardcoded emergency flip so newly launched engineers do not depend on in-container review by default across surfaces/hosts.

Do

  • Add a temporary hardcoded default that disables the in-container review gate for engineer dispatches.
  • Keep explicit skip wording clear in the seed and final outcome. It should say review was disabled by the temporary ward default, not imply CI or QA passed.
  • Preserve the ability to run ward agent review manually for diagnostics.
  • Prefer a small named function/constant with a TODO/reference to the brokered QA follow-up rather than scattering conditionals.
  • Add or update tests proving default engineer seeds omit the in-container review clause while explicit/manual review command behavior remains available.
  • Update docs/features only if the user-visible default changes enough to need it. This likely does need a short note in docs/dispatch-review.md and docs/FEATURES.md saying the in-container gate is temporarily disabled by default pending brokered QA.

Acceptance

  • A normal warded engineer owner/repo#N seed does not require ward agent review before landing.
  • The final outcome review summary records an intentional temporary skip.
  • Existing --skip-review / config skip behavior still works.
  • ward agent review remains callable directly.
  • ward exec test passes.

Context

Related issues:

  • ward#790 - no-reviewer block wording still said advisory-only.
  • ward#791 - Codex reviewer launch probe failed before same-family review could run.
  • ward#792 - design brokered QA roles to replace/deprecate in-container review.
  • ward#795 - advisor/ref dispatch hang from a read-only surface.

Dispatch note

Dispatch with --skip-review; this issue is about disabling the review gate and must not be blocked by it.

## Problem The host-local `~/.ward/config.yaml` kill switch now disables the in-container review gate for new dispatches on this host: ```yaml agent: review: skip: - role:engineer ``` That is useful immediately, but it is host-local. While brokered QA is being designed and review launch regressions are being repaired, ward should also carry a short-lived hardcoded emergency flip so newly launched engineers do not depend on in-container review by default across surfaces/hosts. ## Do * Add a temporary hardcoded default that disables the in-container review gate for engineer dispatches. * Keep explicit skip wording clear in the seed and final outcome. It should say review was disabled by the temporary ward default, not imply CI or QA passed. * Preserve the ability to run `ward agent review` manually for diagnostics. * Prefer a small named function/constant with a TODO/reference to the brokered QA follow-up rather than scattering conditionals. * Add or update tests proving default engineer seeds omit the in-container review clause while explicit/manual review command behavior remains available. * Update docs/features only if the user-visible default changes enough to need it. This likely does need a short note in `docs/dispatch-review.md` and `docs/FEATURES.md` saying the in-container gate is temporarily disabled by default pending brokered QA. ## Acceptance * A normal `warded engineer owner/repo#N` seed does not require `ward agent review` before landing. * The final outcome review summary records an intentional temporary skip. * Existing `--skip-review` / config skip behavior still works. * `ward agent review` remains callable directly. * `ward exec test` passes. ## Context Related issues: * ward#790 - no-reviewer block wording still said advisory-only. * ward#791 - Codex reviewer launch probe failed before same-family review could run. * ward#792 - design brokered QA roles to replace/deprecate in-container review. * ward#795 - advisor/ref dispatch hang from a read-only surface. ## Dispatch note Dispatch with `--skip-review`; this issue is about disabling the review gate and must not be blocked by it.
Author
Member

🔒 Reserved by ward agent --harness codex — container engineer-codex-ward-797 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T09:24:03Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#797 · branch issue-797 · harness codex · workflow pr
  • Run: engineer-codex-ward-797 · ward v0.488.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T09:24:03Z
  • Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.488.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> 🔒 Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` — container `engineer-codex-ward-797` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local` is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T09:24:03Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh** — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#797` · branch `issue-797` · harness `codex` · workflow `pr` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-797` · ward `v0.488.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T09:24:03Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.488.0). </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
Author
Member

WARD-OUTCOME: done - disabled engineer review gate by temporary ward default
workflow: pull-request; review summary: skipped: the temporary ward default pending brokered QA; dispatched with --skip-review

The work was straightforward once the doc split was done, though golangci-lint surfaced a couple of unrelated workflow-helper warnings that needed cleanup before the PR could go green. Confidence is high. The only rough edge is that the temporary default is still a stopgap, so brokered QA should own removing it later.

WARD-OUTCOME: done - disabled engineer review gate by temporary ward default workflow: pull-request; review summary: skipped: the temporary ward default pending brokered QA; dispatched with --skip-review The work was straightforward once the doc split was done, though golangci-lint surfaced a couple of unrelated workflow-helper warnings that needed cleanup before the PR could go green. Confidence is high. The only rough edge is that the temporary default is still a stopgap, so brokered QA should own removing it later.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/ward#797
No description provided.