Recovery verification canary for existing branch resume #782

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-09 07:58:59 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 4 comments

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 07:58:59 +00:00

Member

Goal

Canary for ward#779 existing-branch resume verification. Do not modify runtime code or docs. Inspect the starting git state and post a concise issue comment with:

WARD-RECOVERY-VERIFY-0483: branch resume canary
current branch name
git rev-parse HEAD
git rev-parse origin/issue-735
whether HEAD started from the remote origin/issue-735 branch content

Constraints

Do not commit, push, or open a PR.
If the workflow requires a terminal outcome, use the comment as the artifact and leave the tree unchanged.

Codex, via ward agent

## Goal Canary for ward#779 existing-branch resume verification. Do not modify runtime code or docs. Inspect the starting git state and post a concise issue comment with: * `WARD-RECOVERY-VERIFY-0483: branch resume canary` * current branch name * `git rev-parse HEAD` * `git rev-parse origin/issue-735` * whether HEAD started from the remote `origin/issue-735` branch content ## Constraints * Do not commit, push, or open a PR. * If the workflow requires a terminal outcome, use the comment as the artifact and leave the tree unchanged.  Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 07:59:08 +00:00

Author

Member

🔒 Reserved by ward agent --harness codex — container engineer-codex-ward-782 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T07:59:05Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); --force overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#782 · branch issue-735 · harness codex · workflow patch-only
Run: engineer-codex-ward-782 · ward v0.483.0 · dispatched 2026-07-09T07:59:05Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.483.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

🔒 Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` — container `engineer-codex-ward-782` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local` is carrying this issue (reserved 2026-07-09T07:59:05Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL); `--force` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh** — that is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#782` · branch `issue-735` · harness `codex` · workflow `patch-only` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-782` · ward `v0.483.0` · dispatched `2026-07-09T07:59:05Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.483.0). </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue

2026-07-09 07:59:52 +00:00

Verify ward 0.483 director recovery behavior #779

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 08:00:18 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-RECOVERY-VERIFY-0483: branch resume canary
branch: issue-735
HEAD: 68e468764c
origin/issue-735: 426f031055
started from origin/issue-735 content: no. HEAD is the parent of origin/issue-735, so this checkout did not start at the remote branch tip.

WARD-RECOVERY-VERIFY-0483: branch resume canary branch: issue-735 HEAD: 68e468764c03c309dae71d8c104f73dc5846484e origin/issue-735: 426f0310559ccada81fc11d98c896d95e11ae50b started from origin/issue-735 content: no. HEAD is the parent of origin/issue-735, so this checkout did not start at the remote branch tip.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 08:00:24 +00:00

Author

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: done - posted the recovery snapshot with branch and git ancestry facts
workflow: patch-only; review summary: review gate skipped in-container

This was straightforward. The only surprise was that the local HEAD sits behind origin/issue-735, so the canary reads as a stale-base resume rather than a tip-level resume. Confidence is high, and I do not see a code follow-up from this check alone.

WARD-OUTCOME: done - posted the recovery snapshot with branch and git ancestry facts workflow: patch-only; review summary: review gate skipped in-container This was straightforward. The only surprise was that the local `HEAD` sits behind `origin/issue-735`, so the canary reads as a stale-base resume rather than a tip-level resume. Confidence is high, and I do not see a code follow-up from this check alone.

coilyco-ops added the

headless

labels

2026-07-09 18:09:22 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-09 18:16:33 +00:00

Author

Member

Validation pass: this was a one-shot canary, and it produced its required artifact. The issue thread contains the WARD-RECOVERY-VERIFY-0483: branch resume canary comment with branch, HEAD, origin/issue-735, and the conclusion that HEAD did not start from the remote branch tip. The follow-up implementation is tracked on ward#778, so this canary ticket is no longer active work.

— Codex, via director surface

Validation pass: this was a one-shot canary, and it produced its required artifact. The issue thread contains the `WARD-RECOVERY-VERIFY-0483: branch resume canary` comment with branch, HEAD, origin/issue-735, and the conclusion that HEAD did not start from the remote branch tip. The follow-up implementation is tracked on ward#778, so this canary ticket is no longer active work.  — Codex, via director surface

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-09 18:16:33 +00:00