"blind" openclaw / opencode agent pressure testing #201

Closed
opened 2026-06-19 03:40:13 +00:00 by coilysiren · 4 comments
Owner
No description provided.
Member

Re-triage (goose-triage method, claude-macos-kais-macbook-pro-2 as the judgment engine, 2026-06-24)

  • P4 - Blind openclaw/opencode pressure testing, speculative test idea, icebox.
  • consult - Needs a human to design the bench.
<!-- goose-triage --> **Re-triage** (goose-triage method, claude-macos-kais-macbook-pro-2 as the judgment engine, 2026-06-24) - **P4** - Blind openclaw/opencode pressure testing, speculative test idea, icebox. - **consult** - Needs a human to design the bench.
Member

Re-triage (goose-triage method, claude-macos-kais-macbook-pro-2 as the judgment engine, 2026-06-24)

  • P4 - Blind openclaw/opencode pressure testing, speculative test idea, icebox.
  • consult - Needs a human to design the bench.
<!-- goose-triage --> **Re-triage** (goose-triage method, claude-macos-kais-macbook-pro-2 as the judgment engine, 2026-06-24) - **P4** - Blind openclaw/opencode pressure testing, speculative test idea, icebox. - **consult** - Needs a human to design the bench.
Member

The release pressure-test prompt (Kai's static sweep doc) now defines a first-run behavioral angle anchored to this issue — the cold-RUN complement to the cold-read sweep: with Kai's in-session okay, actually execute the documented happy path on a fresh-ish host (brew tap/install, ward version, ward doctor, ward lint / ward exec build in a scratch toy repo, warded --print dry-run) and file every divergence between documented and observed behavior. Explicitly out of scope: real agent dispatch, containers, remote writes — that's integration testing, not a stranger sweep.

Rationale: all ten existing angles are static; a docs-perfect release with a binary that misbehaves on a clean host passes every one of them. This session's sweep brushed the gap three times (formula comment describing a nonexistent 'ward drive' mechanism, SECURITY.md contradicting the release page ward#430, ward#441's compiled-in coupling).

Filed by Claude Code while extending the 2026-07-01 pressure-test sweep methodology.

The release pressure-test prompt (Kai's static sweep doc) now defines a `first-run` behavioral angle anchored to this issue — the cold-RUN complement to the cold-read sweep: with Kai's in-session okay, actually execute the documented happy path on a fresh-ish host (brew tap/install, ward version, ward doctor, ward lint / ward exec build in a scratch toy repo, warded --print dry-run) and file every divergence between documented and observed behavior. Explicitly out of scope: real agent dispatch, containers, remote writes — that's integration testing, not a stranger sweep. Rationale: all ten existing angles are static; a docs-perfect release with a binary that misbehaves on a clean host passes every one of them. This session's sweep brushed the gap three times (formula comment describing a nonexistent 'ward drive' mechanism, SECURITY.md contradicting the release page ward#430, ward#441's compiled-in coupling). Filed by Claude Code while extending the 2026-07-01 pressure-test sweep methodology.
Member

Flipped headless with post-sweep scope: behavioral pressure-testing of the OSS harnesses (opencode/goose) in-container; findings file into the #457/#458 buckets. The docs-side cold reads are done (#428). Recorded by Claude Code (Fable) during the 2026-07-01 ward launch triage session with Kai.

Flipped headless with post-sweep scope: behavioral pressure-testing of the OSS harnesses (opencode/goose) in-container; findings file into the #457/#458 buckets. The docs-side cold reads are done (#428). Recorded by Claude Code (Fable) during the 2026-07-01 ward launch triage session with Kai.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/ward#201
No description provided.