explicitly bless `ward agent` doing "triage" style exits (eg. post a comment, or break into sub issues, or fan out into milestone) #144

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-06-18 03:11:33 +00:00 by coilysiren · 4 comments

coilysiren commented

2026-06-18 03:11:33 +00:00

Owner

No description provided.

coilysiren commented

2026-06-18 03:38:34 +00:00

Author

Owner

claude response

This issue is a design/policy call with no description: "bless ward agent doing triage-style exits" leaves the core acceptance criteria undefined - what "bless" concretely means (a doc blessing? a code path that permits these exit modes? a new exit contract?), which of the three example exits (comment / sub-issue split / milestone fan-out) are in scope, and what the current ward agent exit behavior even is. Without a description there's no verifiable done-condition, and the wrong interpretation here (e.g. building exit machinery when Kai only wanted a one-line policy blessing) is exactly the kind of costly-to-undo fork that warrants a human. I could scope it by reading the ward agent code, but the intent gap is a judgment Kai needs to close, not something I can safely default unattended.

NO-GO: empty issue body, "bless" is undefined, and the three example exit modes span a one-line doc change to a substantial feature - acceptance criteria need a human before a detached run.

claude response --- This issue is a design/policy call with no description: "bless `ward agent` doing triage-style exits" leaves the core acceptance criteria undefined - what "bless" concretely means (a doc blessing? a code path that permits these exit modes? a new exit contract?), which of the three example exits (comment / sub-issue split / milestone fan-out) are in scope, and what the current `ward agent` exit behavior even is. Without a description there's no verifiable done-condition, and the wrong interpretation here (e.g. building exit machinery when Kai only wanted a one-line policy blessing) is exactly the kind of costly-to-undo fork that warrants a human. I could scope it by reading the `ward agent` code, but the intent gap is a judgment Kai needs to close, not something I can safely default unattended. NO-GO: empty issue body, "bless" is undefined, and the three example exit modes span a one-line doc change to a substantial feature - acceptance criteria need a human before a detached run.

coilysiren added the

consult

labels

2026-06-18 06:20:56 +00:00

coilyco-ops added

and removed

labels

2026-06-24 04:11:57 +00:00

coilyco-ops added

and removed

labels

2026-06-24 17:19:50 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-06-24 17:26:19 +00:00

Member

Re-triage (goose-triage method, claude-macos-kais-macbook-pro-2 as the judgment engine, 2026-06-24)

P4 - Bless ward agent triage-style exits, feature wish, empty body, icebox.
consult - Needs a human to define the blessed exits.

**Re-triage** (goose-triage method, claude-macos-kais-macbook-pro-2 as the judgment engine, 2026-06-24) - **P4** - Bless ward agent triage-style exits, feature wish, empty body, icebox. - **consult** - Needs a human to define the blessed exits.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-06-24 17:28:36 +00:00

Member

Re-triage (goose-triage method, claude-macos-kais-macbook-pro-2 as the judgment engine, 2026-06-24)

P4 - Bless ward agent triage-style exits, feature wish, empty body, icebox.
consult - Needs a human to define the blessed exits.

coilyco-ops referenced this issue

2026-07-02 00:17:07 +00:00

warded director: consult-to-headless conversion flow (decision interview that upgrades tickets to dispatchable) #493

coilyco-ops added

headless

and removed

consult

labels

2026-07-02 00:19:30 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-02 00:21:47 +00:00

Member

Flipped headless with scope: bless triage-style exits in doctrine + the WARD-OUTCOME enum (comment / split into sub-issues / fan into milestone). Interacts with #485's machine-readable outcome contract; the interview flavor lives in #493. Recorded by Claude Code (Fable) during the 2026-07-01 ward launch triage session with Kai.

coilysiren closed this issue

2026-07-04 10:36:44 +00:00