Retrigger PR #1365 after checkout setup timeout #1368

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-15 09:29:39 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 3 comments

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 09:29:39 +00:00

Member

Problem

PR #1365 for issue #1175 is otherwise mergeable, but its pull-request CI run failed before repository code ran:

run 8407 (#2167) failure test.yml pull_request #1365 "Single-source fleet tunable test fixtures"
could not fetch remote 'origin': fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/actions/checkout/': Connection timed out after 300000 milliseconds

ward agent pr recover coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1365 reports the next safe action is to merge once required checks are green. Forgejo's rerun API is unavailable in this environment, so this needs the supported push-based retrigger path.

Acceptance

Re-fire PR #1365's test.yml check with a minimal branch update or other supported push-based rerun mechanism.
If the retry is green, leave #1365 ready for merge.
If the retry reaches repository tests and fails for a real reason, repair the focused failure or leave exact evidence on this issue.

Related: #1175, #1365, run 8407.

## Problem PR #1365 for issue #1175 is otherwise mergeable, but its pull-request CI run failed before repository code ran: ```text run 8407 (#2167) failure test.yml pull_request #1365 "Single-source fleet tunable test fixtures" could not fetch remote 'origin': fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/actions/checkout/': Connection timed out after 300000 milliseconds ``` `ward agent pr recover coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1365` reports the next safe action is to merge once required checks are green. Forgejo's rerun API is unavailable in this environment, so this needs the supported push-based retrigger path. ## Acceptance - Re-fire PR #1365's `test.yml` check with a minimal branch update or other supported push-based rerun mechanism. - If the retry is green, leave #1365 ready for merge. - If the retry reaches repository tests and fails for a real reason, repair the focused failure or leave exact evidence on this issue. Related: #1175, #1365, run 8407.

coilyco-ops added the

coherence-core

headless

labels

2026-07-15 09:29:39 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 09:29:58 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1368 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-15T09:29:57Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1368 · branch issue-1368 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1368 · ward v0.710.0 · dispatched 2026-07-15T09:29:52Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1368` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-15T09:29:57Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1368` · branch `issue-1368` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1368` · ward `v0.710.0` · dispatched `2026-07-15T09:29:52Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.710.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue

2026-07-15 09:30:23 +00:00

Repair failed promote run after PR #1362 #1364

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 09:33:51 +00:00

Author

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1365

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped: in-container review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA
ci: PR #1365 retrigger run 8415 succeeded; test / test (pull_request) is green.
retrospective: pure push-based retrigger; no code changes.
confidence: high
surprises: the branch already had the retrigger commit in place.
follow-ups: merge PR #1365 when the director lane is ready.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1365 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped: in-container review gate intentionally skipped because temporary ward default pending brokered QA ci: PR #1365 retrigger run 8415 succeeded; test / test (pull_request) is green. retrospective: pure push-based retrigger; no code changes. confidence: high surprises: the branch already had the retrigger commit in place. follow-ups: merge PR #1365 when the director lane is ready. </details>

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-15 09:35:24 +00:00

Author

Member

Acceptance completed: retry run 8415 / repository run #2172 passed on PR #1365, the PR merged, and main promote run 8417 / #2174 succeeded. Release run 8418 / #2175 is active. Closing this checkout-timeout retrigger issue; any release failure should be captured separately with its own run evidence.