Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-14T06:37:01Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1201 · branch issue-1201 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1201 · ward v0.667.0 · dispatched 2026-07-14T06:36:53Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.667.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1201` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-14T06:37:01Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1201` · branch `issue-1201` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1201` · ward `v0.667.0` · dispatched `2026-07-14T06:36:53Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.667.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-14 06:41:34 +00:00

docs: add workflow comment helper summaries #1229

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 06:42:54 +00:00

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1229

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default
felt: straightforward, narrow, and low risk.
confidence: high
surprises: none
follow-ups: none

WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1229 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default felt: straightforward, narrow, and low risk. confidence: high surprises: none follow-ups: none  </details>

coilyco-ops added the

headless

labels

2026-07-14 06:50:01 +00:00

coilysiren commented

2026-07-14 06:59:27 +00:00

Author

Owner

I actually meant inline comments on the wardedWorkflowCommentVariants array

I actually meant inline comments on the `wardedWorkflowCommentVariants` array

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 07:42:41 +00:00

Member

Director burn-down note: PR #1229 was closed unmerged after Kai clarified the requested scope: the issue asks for inline comments on the wardedWorkflowCommentVariants array, not helper doc comments elsewhere. This issue remains open and needs a fresh narrow implementation once dispatch is available.

Director burn-down note: PR #1229 was closed unmerged after Kai clarified the requested scope: the issue asks for inline comments on the `wardedWorkflowCommentVariants` array, not helper doc comments elsewhere. This issue remains open and needs a fresh narrow implementation once dispatch is available.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 09:40:01 +00:00

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1201 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-14T09:40:00Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1201 · branch issue-1201 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1201 · ward v0.672.0 · dispatched 2026-07-14T09:39:53Z
Comment thread: 3 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments).
- included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T06:42:54Z), @coilysiren (2026-07-14T06:59:27Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T07:42:41Z)
- stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T06:37:02Z)

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.672.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1201` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-14T09:40:00Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1201` · branch `issue-1201` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1201` · ward `v0.672.0` · dispatched `2026-07-14T09:39:53Z` - **Comment thread:** 3 included in the pre-flight read, 1 stripped (ward's own automated comments). - included: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T06:42:54Z), @coilysiren (2026-07-14T06:59:27Z), @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T07:42:41Z) - stripped: @coilyco-ops (2026-07-14T06:37:02Z) Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.672.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-14 09:43:20 +00:00

add 1 sentence humanized descriptions to the ward comments go code #1260

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-14 09:47:32 +00:00

Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default
felt: the implementation itself was straightforward, but Forgejo Actions stayed stuck in waiting, so the merge path is blocked on the platform, not the diff.
confidence: medium
surprises: run #2002 never left waiting after repeated polls.
follow-ups: wait for the runner queue to clear, then rerun the workflow and finish the merge.

WARDED_WORKFLOW: blocked 🛑 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default felt: the implementation itself was straightforward, but Forgejo Actions stayed stuck in waiting, so the merge path is blocked on the platform, not the diff. confidence: medium surprises: run #2002 never left waiting after repeated polls. follow-ups: wait for the runner queue to clear, then rerun the workflow and finish the merge. </details>

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-14 09:51:13 +00:00