--no-triage should skip the interactive session prompt #1179

Closed
opened 2026-07-13 17:33:26 +00:00 by coilysiren · 2 comments
Owner
No description provided.
Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held

reservation details

Holder: launch intent for container engineer-codex-ward-1179 on host kais-macbook-pro-2.local.

Accepted by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-14T09:09:00Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
  • Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1179 · branch issue-1179 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
  • Run: engineer-codex-ward-1179 · ward v0.672.0 · dispatched 2026-07-14T09:08:58Z
  • Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.672.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

<!-- ward-agent-reservation --> WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: launch intent for container `engineer-codex-ward-1179` on host `kais-macbook-pro-2.local`. Accepted by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-14T09:09:00Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1179` · branch `issue-1179` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1179` · ward `v0.672.0` · dispatched `2026-07-14T09:08:58Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.672.0). </details> </details> <!-- ward-agent-signature --> — Codex, via `ward agent`
Member

WARDED_WORKFLOW: #1258

details workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default) felt: small and direct, one loop seam plus fixture updates confidence: high surprises: full ward exec test hit the repo scratch-space capacity guard in this container follow-ups: none
WARDED_WORKFLOW: https://forgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/ward/pulls/1258 <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default) felt: small and direct, one loop seam plus fixture updates confidence: high surprises: full ward exec test hit the repo scratch-space capacity guard in this container follow-ups: none </details>
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1179
No description provided.