add a ward repo docker image build that can run simple demos and mounts a workspace + substrate combo of some popular OSS repo + org #1140

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-13 02:28:00 +00:00 by coilysiren · 2 comments

coilysiren commented

2026-07-13 02:28:00 +00:00

Owner

The problem

and make sure it doesn't include any of my personal stuff, at all

Proposed change

Alternatives considered

No response

Before filing

I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
This stays within ward's scope (the dev-verb gate / agent driver), not a personal-infra or downstream-repo verb.

### The problem and make sure it doesn't include any of my personal stuff, at all ### Proposed change // ### Alternatives considered _No response_ ### Before filing - [x] I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] This stays within ward's scope (the dev-verb gate / agent driver), not a personal-infra or downstream-repo verb.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-13 03:17:47 +00:00

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-1140 on host KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-13T03:17:44Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1140 · branch issue-1140 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1140 · ward v0.633.0 · dispatched 2026-07-13T03:17:44Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.633.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-1140` on host `KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-13T03:17:44Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1140` · branch `issue-1140` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1140` · ward `v0.633.0` · dispatched `2026-07-13T03:17:44Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.633.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-13 03:31:08 +00:00

add a ward repo docker image build that can run simple demos and mounts a workspace + substrate combo of some popular OSS repo + org #1152

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-07-13 03:32:23 +00:00

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-13 03:32:49 +00:00

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: submitted

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped review gate intentionally skipped because the temporary ward default is pending brokered QA. felt: straightforward wiring, with the only real friction in the repo-wide hook baseline. confidence: medium-high surprises: Forgejo PR checks ran on a merge commit, and the local Docker daemon was unavailable here. follow-ups: merge PR #1152 when the director lane is ready.

WARD-OUTCOME: submitted <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped review gate intentionally skipped because the temporary ward default is pending brokered QA. felt: straightforward wiring, with the only real friction in the repo-wide hook baseline. confidence: medium-high surprises: Forgejo PR checks ran on a merge commit, and the local Docker daemon was unavailable here. follow-ups: merge PR #1152 when the director lane is ready. </details>