emit more ward configs in the pre launch method #1137

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-13 01:22:47 +00:00 by coilysiren · 2 comments

coilysiren commented

2026-07-13 01:22:47 +00:00

Owner

The problem

Proposed change

the critical omission is the route to the ward config

put I also want see everything input via CLI, even including the things that have default values

poll-interval
max-cycles
engineer harness

the pre launch method should have this stuff added programmatically

Alternatives considered

No response

Before filing

I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate.
This stays within ward's scope (the dev-verb gate / agent driver), not a personal-infra or downstream-repo verb.

### The problem // ### Proposed change the critical omission is the route to the ward config put I also want see everything input via CLI, even including the things that have default values - poll-interval - max-cycles - engineer harness the pre launch method should have this stuff added programmatically ### Alternatives considered _No response_ ### Before filing - [x] I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] This stays within ward's scope (the dev-verb gate / agent driver), not a personal-infra or downstream-repo verb.

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-13 03:40:06 +00:00

Member

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒

reservation details

Holder: container engineer-codex-ward-1137 on host KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER.

Reserved by ward agent --harness codex (reserved 2026-07-13T03:40:02Z). Concurrent ward agent runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (3h TTL). --override-reservation overrides.

Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).

run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)

Resolved: coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1137 · branch issue-1137 · harness codex · workflow pull-request-and-merge
Run: engineer-codex-ward-1137 · ward v0.633.0 · dispatched 2026-07-13T03:40:02Z
Comment thread: 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments).

Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.633.0).

— Codex, via ward agent

WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒 <details><summary>reservation details</summary> Holder: container `engineer-codex-ward-1137` on host `KAI-DESKTOP-TOWER`. Reserved by `ward agent --harness codex` (reserved 2026-07-13T03:40:02Z). Concurrent `ward agent` runs are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (3h TTL). `--override-reservation` overrides. **Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved.** The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a **new issue, dispatched fresh**. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494). <details><summary>run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)</summary> - **Resolved:** `coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1137` · branch `issue-1137` · harness `codex` · workflow `pull-request-and-merge` - **Run:** `engineer-codex-ward-1137` · ward `v0.633.0` · dispatched `2026-07-13T03:40:02Z` - **Comment thread:** 0 included in the pre-flight read, 0 stripped (ward's own automated comments). Static container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.633.0). </details> </details>  — Codex, via `ward agent`

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-07-13 03:55:46 +00:00

fix: surface director launch config in print plan #1161

coilyco-ops commented

2026-07-13 03:57:00 +00:00

Member

WARD-OUTCOME: submitted

details

workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because the temporary ward default is pending brokered QA.

felt: the change stayed localized to the director print path and the test was easy to pin down.

confidence: high

surprises: the repo hook also required tightening an existing broker comment block, so I fixed that to land cleanly.

follow-ups: merge PR #1161 after approval.

WARD-OUTCOME: submitted <details><summary>details</summary> workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate intentionally skipped because the temporary ward default is pending brokered QA. felt: the change stayed localized to the director print path and the test was easy to pin down. confidence: high surprises: the repo hook also required tightening an existing broker comment block, so I fixed that to land cleanly. follow-ups: merge PR #1161 after approval. </details>

coilysiren referenced this issue from a commit

2026-07-13 06:44:44 +00:00

Merge ward PR #1161: fix: surface director launch config in print plan

coilysiren closed this issue

2026-07-13 06:44:44 +00:00