No LICENSE file blocks adoption #76

Closed
opened 2026-08-16 00:26:39 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 1 comment
Member

Problem

This repo ships no license. GitHub reports license: NONE.

Under default copyright, no license means all rights reserved. Nobody may legally use, copy, modify, or distribute the code, whatever the README invites them to do. Practical consequences for a repo being actively promoted:

  • A meaningful share of engineers will not adopt, fork, or even star an unlicensed repo.
  • Corporate dependency scanners and license-policy gates reject unlicensed sources outright.
  • It reads as unfinished, which is the opposite of the "audit one small file, know the blast radius" pitch the README makes well.

Sibling repos in the same org already carry MIT: ward, umbra, agent-compose, agentic-os.

Proposed change

Add MIT, matching the rest of the portfolio and the estate default, unless there is a reason this one differs.

agent-proxy has the same gap and has its own issue.

Scope

Engineer. A license file is a legal and repository change rather than human-facing copy, so it sits outside the content boundary even though it is a small diff.

## Problem This repo ships no license. GitHub reports `license: NONE`. Under default copyright, no license means all rights reserved. Nobody may legally use, copy, modify, or distribute the code, whatever the README invites them to do. Practical consequences for a repo being actively promoted: * A meaningful share of engineers will not adopt, fork, or even star an unlicensed repo. * Corporate dependency scanners and license-policy gates reject unlicensed sources outright. * It reads as unfinished, which is the opposite of the "audit one small file, know the blast radius" pitch the README makes well. Sibling repos in the same org already carry MIT: ward, umbra, agent-compose, agentic-os. ## Proposed change Add MIT, matching the rest of the portfolio and the estate default, unless there is a reason this one differs. `agent-proxy` has the same gap and has its own issue. ## Scope Engineer. A license file is a legal and repository change rather than human-facing copy, so it sits outside the content boundary even though it is a small diff.
Author
Member

Fixed on main in 95311d5. MIT, byte-identical to umbra's, plus a ## License section in the README.

No reason this one differs from the portfolio default, so it took the default.

Fixed on `main` in `95311d5`. MIT, byte-identical to umbra's, plus a `## License` section in the README. No reason this one differs from the portfolio default, so it took the default.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/mcp-beaver#76
No description provided.