Fix Telegram CI alert action refs and reroll affected workflows #521
Labels
No labels
burndown-2026-06
coherence-core
consult
headless
interactive
P0
P1
P2
P3
P4
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#521
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Current Forgejo CI is red across many repos because the Telegram alert rollout inserted a remote action ref that Forgejo runner resolves through GitHub incorrectly.
Evidence from the director scan on 2026-07-10:
coilyco-flight-deck,coilyco-bridge,coilyco-gaming, andcoilysiren.failed to read action 'Alert Telegram on main failure', no files found after reading paths: action.yml, action.yaml, Dockerfilehttps://github.com/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-osfor the reusable action. The GitHub mirror documented inagentic-os/docs/mirror-to-github.mdiscoilysiren/agentic-os, souses: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os/actions/telegram-alert@mainis the wrong remote ref for consumer repos.Likely fix:
scripts/telegram-ci-alert-rollout.py, changeACTION_REF_REMOTEfromcoilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os/actions/telegram-alert@mainto the GitHub mirror ref that actually resolves,coilysiren/agentic-os/actions/telegram-alert@main.scripts/test_telegram_ci_alert_rollout.pyanddocs/telegram-ci-alerts.mdto match.Alert Telegram on main failureis present, so it may also need to replace stale alert blocks rather than treating them as idempotently correct.uses:line after rollout.Acceptance:
uses: coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os/actions/telegram-alert@main.uses: coilysiren/agentic-os/actions/telegram-alert@main, exceptcoilyco-flight-deck/agentic-ositself, which should continue using the local./actions/telegram-alertpath.WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒
reservation details
Holder: container
engineer-codex-infrastructure-521on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Reserved by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-10T08:45:25Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL).--forceoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#521· branchissue-521· harnesscodex· workflowdirect-mainengineer-codex-infrastructure-521· wardv0.569.0· dispatched2026-07-10T08:45:25ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.569.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-OUTCOME: done
details
review summary: skipped.
workflow: direct-to-main; review summary: skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default.
felt: straightforward, with one merge from origin/main after the rollout push.
confidence: high.
surprises: the rollout commit landed first, then main advanced and needed a merge.
follow-ups: none.