Apply Forgejo runner registration token TTL to build and tap-writer runners #511
Labels
No labels
burndown-2026-06
coherence-core
consult
headless
interactive
P0
P1
P2
P3
P4
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#511
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Problem
The deploy runner auto-rotation follow-up is tracked in infrastructure#510, but the same persistent
.runnerpattern exists on the other Forgejo runner StatefulSets:deploy/forgejo-runner.yml- build runners, 4 replicas,/data/.runneron a PVC.deploy/forgejo-runner-tap-writer.yml- tap writer, 1 replica,/data/.runneron a PVC.Each init container skips registration whenever
.runnerexists, so runner auth tokens can live indefinitely until a manual PVC/config cleanup.Desired behavior
Apply the same bounded
.runnerTTL policy to all Forgejo runner StatefulSets, not justforgejo-runner-deploy:/data/.runneris older than the chosen TTL, remove it before registration.Notes
This should coordinate with infrastructure#510. If #510 lands a shared shell snippet or doc pattern, reuse it rather than inventing a second implementation.
WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒
reservation details
Holder: container
engineer-codex-infrastructure-511on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Reserved by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-09T22:02:34Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL).--forceoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#511· branchissue-511· harnesscodex· workflowdirect-to-mainengineer-codex-infrastructure-511· wardv0.493.0· dispatched2026-07-09T22:02:34ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.493.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-OUTCOME: done ✅
details
workflow: direct-to-main; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default
retrospective: the change felt routine once I dropped the stale local snippet and kept the remote deploy-runner TTL work as the source of truth.
confidence: high
surprises: origin/main advanced mid-run, so I had to merge the sibling TTL landing and preserve the unrelated staged tree already in the repo.
follow-ups: none