Apply automation-mode labels fleet-wide + gaming tier/mode org-labels (mode-axis companion to #471) #472
Labels
No labels
burndown-2026-06
coherence-core
consult
headless
interactive
P0
P1
P2
P3
P4
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#472
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Companion to #471 (that sweep did the tier axis for flight-deck+bridge; it deliberately left the automation-mode axis unlabeled). Filed from a
warded directorread-only surface session (2026-07-04), continuing the triage across all three orgs (flight-deck, bridge, gaming).What this covers
headless/interactive/consult) for the 187 open issues that carried no mode label, across flight-deck + bridge + gaming. Applied thetooling-issue-prioritizationautomation-mode method: per-issue judgment, fail-closed toconsulton anything needing a decision / design / access / credential / destructive-prod step. Result: 146 consult, 21 headless, 20 interactive.headless/interactive/consultare created first (colors/descriptions match flight-deck).Why it's a block, not applied directly
ward ops forgejo issue-label add/org-label createare out of the director surface write tier (refused - the broker serves the write tier only: create/edit/comment/close/reopen), same wall #471 hit. Apply the block below from a host whoseward ops forgejocarries the label-write tier.Headless promotions (21) - the autonomous-eligible set
coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#10coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#11coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#12coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#13coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#14coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#15coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#16coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#18coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-kai#703coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-kai#708coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-kai#711coilyco-bridge/atlas#12coilyco-bridge/lore#3coilyco-flight-deck/backend#35coilyco-flight-deck/galaxy-gen#31coilyco-flight-deck/galaxy-gen#32coilyco-flight-deck/homebrew-tap#1coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#291coilyco-flight-deck/lunch-money-k8s#21coilyco-gaming/eco-app#36coilyco-gaming/eco-app#46Interactive (20) - agent can work it, parks at a human checkpoint
coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#19coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#24coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-hardware#6coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-kai#707coilyco-bridge/deploy#42coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard#182coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard#183coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard#184coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard#185coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard#188coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard#189coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#174coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#210coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#211coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#212coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#452coilyco-flight-deck/repo-recall#114coilyco-gaming/eco-app#35coilyco-gaming/eco-ops#32coilyco-gaming/eco-ops#35Everything else in the 187 landed
consult(fail-closed default).Headless burn dispatched tonight
Because ward#607 (the mode-ceiling in ward's real dispatch path) has not landed yet,
warded engineerdoes not gate on the mode label, so a burn could start before this block is applied. I dispatched a conservative, one-per-repo (no same-repo main-merge races), autonomous-merge-safe wave of 9warded engineerruns:coilyco-bridge/atlas#12,coilyco-bridge/lore#3,coilyco-flight-deck/backend#35,coilyco-flight-deck/galaxy-gen#31,coilyco-flight-deck/homebrew-tap#1,coilyco-flight-deck/lunch-money-k8s#21,coilyco-gaming/eco-app#36,coilyco-bridge/agentic-os-kai#703,coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#291Held for a wave 2 (same-repo follow-ons, to serialize the merge):
galaxy-gen#32,eco-app#46,agentic-os-kai#708,agentic-os-kai#711. The 8 agentic-os-hardware headless items (test-case + cleanup work in a Kai-curated bench repo) are labeled headless but were not auto-fired.Apply block
WARD-RESERVATION: held 🔒
reservation details
Holder: container
engineer-codex-infrastructure-472on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Reserved by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-10T11:51:27Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until it finishes or the reservation goes stale (1h TTL).--forceoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilyco-flight-deck/infrastructure#472· branchissue-472· harnesscodex· workflowdirect-mainengineer-codex-infrastructure-472· wardv0.580.0· dispatched2026-07-10T11:51:27ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.580.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentWARD-OUTCOME: done
details
workflow: direct-to-main; review summary: skipped (review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default)
retrospective: the sweep was mostly mechanical API plumbing. One stale staged blob and one remote-main race were the only friction.
confidence: high
surprises: the gaming consult org-label description already carried a stray leading quote, and the latest push also tripped the mirror-sync workflow.
follow-ups: if exact org-label text parity matters, the gaming consult label still needs an admin-scoped PATCH.