Name the coily wrapper in the deny message for pass-through tools #47
Labels
No labels
burndown-2026-06
sunday-sprint
coherence-core
consult
headless
interactive
P0
P1
P2
P3
P4
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard#47
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Friction
An agent that reaches for a bare tool coily wraps (
kubectl,aws,gh,flyctl,gcloud,mcporter) hits the cli-guard deny and often gives up, never learning the allowed path exists. Concrete case today: an agent needed cluster access, ran barekubectl, got denied, and concluded kai-server was unreachable - whencoily ops kubectlwas available the whole time and resolved it instantly.Options considered
coily ops kubectl". Highest signal (the denial is the teachable moment), lowest maintenance, zero context cost until needed. Covers exactly the pass-through set coily already wraps.Proposed
Add the bare-tool ->
coily ops <tool>redirect map to the cli-guard pre-tool-use deny message for the pass-through set (aws, gh, kubectl, flyctl, gcloud, mcporter). Ships from coily/cli-guard.Backlog burndown 2026-06-17: closing low-priority (P3/P4) to bring the open count to a manageable level. Nothing lost — reopen if this resurfaces. Batch tag:
burndown-2026-06.