MCP KDL: add upstream MCP proxy grants for guarded passthroughs #214
Labels
No labels
burndown-2026-06
sunday-sprint
coherence-core
consult
headless
interactive
P0
P1
P2
P3
P4
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard#214
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Context
Kai wants a Grubhub MCP that is a guarded passthrough to a private Playwright MCP: sticky personal Grubhub auth, Grubhub-only browsing, read-only by policy, and no semantic Grubhub API layer.
The deploy/service shape should be authored in coilyco-bridge/deploy and the runtime proxy behavior should live in ward-mcp, but the core KDL/specgen belongs in cli-guard so ward-mcp stays a consumer.
Desired cli-guard work
Non-goals for v1
Acceptance sketch
A ward-mcp consumer can write a .mcp.kdl surface that exposes a small allowlisted subset of Playwright MCP tools, with generated schemas preserved and unknown upstream tools omitted from the served MCP surface.
WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held
reservation details
Holder: launch intent for container
engineer-codex-cli-guard-214on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Accepted by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-14T08:56:27Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL).--override-reservationoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilyco-flight-deck/cli-guard#214· branchissue-214· harnesscodex· workflowpull-request-and-mergeengineer-codex-cli-guard-214· wardv0.672.0· dispatched2026-07-14T08:56:25ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.672.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentWARDED_WORKFLOW: #228
details
workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: review gate skipped by ~/.ward/config.yaml default
felt: the parser change was direct, and the only friction was repo-local cache pressure during validation.
confidence: high
surprises: the full repo test suite hit unrelated environment-sensitive failures, but the touched package and pre-commit gate passed.
follow-ups: none