Restore agentic-os-full latest image for warded engineer launches #532
Labels
No labels
burndown-2026-06
coherence-core
consult
headless
interactive
P0
P1
P2
P3
P4
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#532
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Problem
During the 2026-07-14 director burndown, dispatching
coilyco-flight-deck/ward#1281reached reservation and sibling container creation, then failed before the engineer could launch because the host could not pull or find the dev-base image:ward agent dispatch-healththen reportedstale-prelaunch=1for ward#1281. This blocks new headless engineers even when issue dispatch and reservation succeed.Impact
The director cannot continue the requested headless burndown reliably because new sibling engineer containers cannot start without an available
agentic-os-full:latestimage or an updated launch image reference.Do
agentic-os-full:latesttag, changing Ward launch configuration to an existing release tag, or restoring the expected moving alias.Acceptance
warded <headless issue> --harness codexcan create the sibling container instead of failing withmanifest unknownforagentic-os-full:latest.WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held
reservation details
Holder: launch intent for container
engineer-codex-agentic-os-532on host2954e4865732.Accepted by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-14T12:03:56Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL).--override-reservationoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#532· branchissue-532· harnesscodex· workflowpull-request-and-mergeengineer-codex-agentic-os-532· wardv0.679.0· dispatched2026-07-14T12:03:54ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.679.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentDirector follow-up from 2026-07-14: dispatch was attempted immediately after filing this issue. It reached reservation and sibling container creation for
engineer-codex-agentic-os-532, then failed with the same blocker: pull offorgejo.coilysiren.me/coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os-full:latestfailed, no local image existed, Docker returnedmanifest unknown, and ward ended withward container: create sibling: exit status 1. This issue cannot currently be fixed by a fresh headless engineer because the missing image prevents the engineer container from starting.WARDED_WORKFLOW: reservation-held
reservation details
Holder: launch intent for container
engineer-codex-agentic-os-532on hostkais-macbook-pro-2.local.Accepted by
ward agent --harness codex(reserved 2026-07-14T15:24:17Z). Concurrentward agentruns are blocked until this intent becomes visible or the intent is released. The stale-intent fallback is still TTL-bounded (3h TTL).--override-reservationoverrides.Do not comment on or edit this issue to steer the run while it is reserved. The engineer seeded the body once at launch and never re-reads it, so a comment or edit reaches only human readers, never the running engineer. A correction goes to a new issue, dispatched fresh. That is the only channel that reaches a run in flight. Where the forge supports it, ward locks this conversation to make that a road-block rather than a convention (ward#494).
run seed context — what this run is carrying (ward#609)
coilyco-flight-deck/agentic-os#532· branchissue-532· harnesscodex· workflowpull-request-and-mergeengineer-codex-agentic-os-532· wardv0.686.0· dispatched2026-07-14T15:24:09ZStatic container doctrine and seed boilerplate are identical every run and omitted here (they ride ward v0.686.0).
— Codex, via
ward agentWARDED_WORKFLOW: #533
details
workflow: pull-request-and-merge; review summary: skipped intentionally because the temporary ward default is pending brokered QA retrospective: the fix felt small once the publish path was traced, but the release alias split needed careful wording confidence: high surprise: the doc cap forced a second trim pass follow-ups: none