just smoke fails on two stale assertions, and has been red on main since before the reflow #319
Labels
No labels
autonomy
async-consult
autonomy
epic
autonomy
headless
autonomy
live-collab
coherence-core
priority
P0
priority
P1
priority
P2
priority
P3
priority
P4
qa-fixture
role/ai
role/creator
role/design
role/director
role/engineer
role/exec
role/human
role/ops
role/qa
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/agent-compose#319
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Found while updating
scripts/smoke.shfor the seven-seat reflow. This is not caused by the reflow. I reproduced it on a detached worktree atde934cc, the tip before any of my commits, on a clean checkout.just smokeis not part ofjust test, which is why it went unnoticed:scripts/test.shruns the Go suite, the palette test, and the pre-commit sweep, and never calls the smoke.Failure one
scripts/smoke.sh:184assertsopal engineerappears in the composed output. No fixture in the smoke tree writes that name, andgrep -r opalacross the repo finds it only indocs/person-contract.mdanddocs/statusline.mdas documentation examples, plus two test fixtures that build their own person. The composed file carries**Agent // Angie (she)**and the other shipped seat names instead.So the assertion appears to be a leftover from an identity-override era rather than a real regression. It should either assert a seat the smoke actually produces, or the smoke should install an identity override that produces the seat it asserts. I did not guess which, so it is untouched apart from the rename.
Failure two
With the first assertion stubbed out to keep going:
This is the bare-Codex introduction launch, which shells a stub
fake codexfrom$smoke_root/bin. It reaches the assertion, so the launch itself runs. Whether the prompt text moved or the stub is not being reached the way the assertion expects, I did not chase.Reproduction
What did change here
12c7198renamed the slugs the smoke drives: the composed-skill role binding, the launched role, the projectedrole-*andpersonality-*skill paths, and the assertion strings that name them. Those edits are mechanical and do not touch either failing assertion.