Remediate failed Core role evaluation cases #230

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-08-06 10:51:52 +00:00 by coilyco-ops · 1 comment

coilyco-ops commented

2026-08-06 10:51:52 +00:00

Member

Goal

Correct the owning role and scenario contracts behind the five failed Core role evaluation cases, then rerun the affected role packs with fresh Codex sessions and independent review.

Workflow

direct-to-main

Acceptance criteria

Ops distinguishes component signals from proven end-to-end availability.
Ops conditions rollback on runtime authority and requests the exact scoped authorization when authority is absent.
Ops keeps reusable product and AOS repository landing with Engineering.
Designer's personality scenario creates room for imaginative and playful expression without inviting invented evidence.
Creator leaves unnamed former slugs unknown, hands configuration and implementation to Engineering, hands fresh evaluation execution to AI Engineering, and requires explicit publication authorization.
Affected role prose stays within the proposed 400-word authored-body target where practical without changing the established format or style.
Every affected active case is rerun in a fresh Codex session and scored by a separate fresh reviewer.
Compact review records and the aggregate scorecard are updated from the new source revision.
Validation results and any remaining failures are recorded honestly.

## Goal Correct the owning role and scenario contracts behind the five failed Core role evaluation cases, then rerun the affected role packs with fresh Codex sessions and independent review. ## Workflow `direct-to-main` ## Acceptance criteria * Ops distinguishes component signals from proven end-to-end availability. * Ops conditions rollback on runtime authority and requests the exact scoped authorization when authority is absent. * Ops keeps reusable product and AOS repository landing with Engineering. * Designer's personality scenario creates room for imaginative and playful expression without inviting invented evidence. * Creator leaves unnamed former slugs unknown, hands configuration and implementation to Engineering, hands fresh evaluation execution to AI Engineering, and requires explicit publication authorization. * Affected role prose stays within the proposed 400-word authored-body target where practical without changing the established format or style. * Every affected active case is rerun in a fresh Codex session and scored by a separate fresh reviewer. * Compact review records and the aggregate scorecard are updated from the new source revision. * Validation results and any remaining failures are recorded honestly.

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a commit

2026-08-06 10:56:30 +00:00

fix(evaluations): tighten failed role contracts (#230)

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a commit

2026-08-06 11:06:39 +00:00

fix(evaluations): clarify ops evidence boundaries (#230)

coilyco-ops referenced this issue from a commit

2026-08-06 11:13:59 +00:00

test(evaluations): record remediated core role results (#230)

coilyco-ops commented

2026-08-06 11:14:15 +00:00

Author

Member

Completed on canonical main.

Landed commits:

137fb8b - tightened Ops and Creator role contracts, compressed Creator to 399 authored-body words, and repaired the Designer and Creator scenarios.
7f09d10 - removed the Ops communication ambiguity and made rollback authority explicit.
1b439d1 - landed compact independent-review records and the regenerated scorecard.

Evaluation result:

Ops: 8/8 cases pass, 68/68 points.
Designer: 8/8 cases pass, 66/66 points.
Creator: 10/10 cases pass, 82/82 points.
Aggregate: 67/67 cases pass, 559/560 points.
All 26 affected cases used fresh gpt-5.6-sol medium candidate sessions and separate fresh high-reasoning reviewer sessions.
Generated packs, raw event streams, and reviewer working files remained temporary. Only compact review records were committed.

Validation:

ward exec build passed.
ward exec lint passed.
ward exec pre-commit passed.
ward exec evaluation-scorecard-check passed.
ward exec test has only the three accepted identity-refactor failures: TestConvergeComposesRosterIntoCascade, TestBuildUsesDiscordNativeContentCreatorCases, and TestLoadEmbeddedRoster. Evaluation pack-digest and Creator contract tests pass.

Completed on canonical `main`. Landed commits: * `137fb8b` - tightened Ops and Creator role contracts, compressed Creator to 399 authored-body words, and repaired the Designer and Creator scenarios. * `7f09d10` - removed the Ops communication ambiguity and made rollback authority explicit. * `1b439d1` - landed compact independent-review records and the regenerated scorecard. Evaluation result: * Ops: 8/8 cases pass, 68/68 points. * Designer: 8/8 cases pass, 66/66 points. * Creator: 10/10 cases pass, 82/82 points. * Aggregate: 67/67 cases pass, 559/560 points. * All 26 affected cases used fresh `gpt-5.6-sol` medium candidate sessions and separate fresh high-reasoning reviewer sessions. * Generated packs, raw event streams, and reviewer working files remained temporary. Only compact review records were committed. Validation: * `ward exec build` passed. * `ward exec lint` passed. * `ward exec pre-commit` passed. * `ward exec evaluation-scorecard-check` passed. * `ward exec test` has only the three accepted identity-refactor failures: `TestConvergeComposesRosterIntoCascade`, `TestBuildUsesDiscordNativeContentCreatorCases`, and `TestLoadEmbeddedRoster`. Evaluation pack-digest and Creator contract tests pass.

coilyco-ops referenced this issue

2026-08-06 11:14:15 +00:00

Compress Core role briefings and enforce a 400-word ceiling #226

coilyco-ops closed this issue

2026-08-06 11:14:16 +00:00

coilyco-ops referenced this issue

2026-08-06 11:27:01 +00:00

Refresh evaluations for the eight-role Creator roster #223