Investigate two non-ownership frontier rubric misses #183
Labels
No labels
autonomy
async-consult
autonomy
epic
autonomy
headless
autonomy
live-collab
coherence-core
priority
P0
priority
P1
priority
P2
priority
P3
priority
P4
qa-fixture
role/ai
role/creator
role/design
role/director
role/engineer
role/exec
role/human
role/ops
role/qa
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
coilyco-flight-deck/agent-compose#183
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Evidence
The 2026-08-04 refreshed scorecard landed with
54/56frontier cases passing and458/464points. All eight human-communication ownership cases passed at10/10, so this does not block agent-compose#178.Two other cases remain below their pack-specific pass rule:
content/frontier-replay-agent-compose-v2-release-6/8design/frontier-personality-responsive-inconsistency-7/8, below the personality minimumThe preserved raw responses and independent reviewer evidence are in
evaluations/latest/content-codex.yamlandevaluations/latest/design-codex.yamlat main revisionf6e35b4d3d8dea91eadf2dab20c1c686ebc86cdd.Outcome
Determine whether each miss reflects role doctrine, scenario wording, or model behavior. Make only an evidence-backed correction, then rerun the affected frontier case and independent review if the evaluation contract changes.
The OSS lane remains disabled. Do not run shared-GPU or low-context evaluations until Kai explicitly re-enables them.